From: "Chen, Yu C" <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
To: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Cc: <x86@kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<tglx@kernel.org>, <bp@alien8.de>, <mingo@redhat.com>,
<dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, <hpa@zytor.com>,
<dave.martin@arm.com>, <james.morse@arm.com>,
<fenghuay@nvidia.com>, <babu.moger@amd.com>,
<anil.keshavamurthy@broadcom.com>, <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/6] x86/resctrl: Add support for L3 occupancy monitoring via RMID MMIO read
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2026 22:09:48 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <04f67dbd-43ed-4863-a51f-cf75e9a02e55@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ec8650d4-71fb-468c-8adb-f1fe94eda813@intel.com>
Hi Reinette,
On 6/19/2026 7:40 AM, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> Hi Chenyu,
>
> On 6/13/26 12:57 AM, Chen Yu wrote:
>> The CMRC (Cache Monitoring Registers for CPU Agents Description)
>> ACPI sub-table provides the MMIO address used to read the LLC
>> occupancy counter for each RMID. When ERDT is enabled on the
>> platform, use this MMIO interface instead of the legacy MSR read
>> to obtain the L3 occupancy value.
>>
>> Introduce erdt_mon_read(), a helper that retrieves monitoring
>> data for a given RMID and event ID from an ERDT domain. Initial
>> support is added for the L3 occupancy monitoring event
>> (QOS_L3_OCCUP_EVENT_ID).
>>
>> If the platform supports ERDT, CMRC-based MMIO access is used by
>> default. If ERDT is unavailable, the implementation is to use
>> MSR-based operations.
>
> (nit: please write in imperative tone and use entire line length available)
>
> ...
>
OK, will do in next version.
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/resctrl.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/resctrl.h
>> index 97c2f6bc7a5f..9b3b03279dd8 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/resctrl.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/resctrl.h
>> @@ -41,6 +41,8 @@ struct resctrl_pqr_state {
>> };
>>
>> bool erdt_enabled(void);
>> +struct rdt_domain_hdr;
>> +int erdt_mon_read(struct rdt_domain_hdr *hdr, int ev_id, int rmid, u64 *val);
>>
>> DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct resctrl_pqr_state, pqr_state);
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c
>> index 90730f0851fa..fe812f7190fc 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c
>> @@ -965,7 +965,7 @@ static __init bool get_rdt_mon_resources(void)
>> bool ret = false;
>>
>> if (rdt_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_CQM_OCCUP_LLC)) {
>> - resctrl_enable_mon_event(QOS_L3_OCCUP_EVENT_ID, false, 0, NULL);
>> + resctrl_enable_mon_event(QOS_L3_OCCUP_EVENT_ID, erdt_enabled(), 0, NULL);
>> ret = true;
>> }
>> if (rdt_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_CQM_MBM_TOTAL)) {
>
> As mentioned in patch #1, when erdt_enabled() is true the enumeration still proceeds to
> enumerate the monitoring properties via CPUID to discover the number of RMIDs that the
> *MSR* supports and use it as the maximum RMID (and thus the maximum number of registers)
> that MMIO supports?
>
OK, will switch to the maximum RMID exposed by ACPI table, if
erdt_enabled() is true.
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
>> index 9209927f88a2..1491f96b57c3 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
>> @@ -278,6 +278,13 @@ int resctrl_arch_rmid_read(struct rdt_resource *r, struct rdt_domain_hdr *hdr,
>>
>> switch (r->rid) {
>> case RDT_RESOURCE_L3:
>> + /*
>> + * No SNC for mmio based L3 occupancy, so there is no need
>
> "No SNC for mmio based L3 occupancy" is too significant to be buried like this. Could you
> please elaborate on this claim and enforce it with the implementation? For example,
> could rdt_get_l3_mon_config() WARN and *not* set r->mon_capable if erdt_enable() and
> snc_nodes_per_l3_cache > 1?
>
IIUC, SNC happens to be unsupported on platforms that currently support
MMIO-based
access. I’m not sure if there will be a platform that enables both MMIO
access and
SNC. I’ll add a WARN here as suggested (and handle the case if such
platform is
introduced later).
thanks,
Chenyu
>> + * to convert logical RMID to a physical RMID via
>> + * logical_rmid_to_physical_rmid().
>> + */
>> + if (erdt_enabled() && eventid == QOS_L3_OCCUP_EVENT_ID)
>> + return erdt_mon_read(hdr, eventid, rmid, val);
>> return arch_l3_read_event(hdr, rmid, eventid, val, r);
>> case RDT_RESOURCE_PERF_PKG:
>> return intel_aet_read_event(hdr->id, rmid, arch_priv, val);
>
> Reinette
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-22 14:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-13 7:56 [PATCH v4 0/6] Introduce MMIO-based CMT access for Enhanced RDT Chen Yu
2026-06-13 7:56 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] x86/resctrl: Parse ACPI ERDT table and map RMDD domains by L3 cache ID Chen Yu
2026-06-18 23:37 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-06-22 9:07 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-06-22 21:28 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-06-23 6:29 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-06-23 11:43 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-06-23 16:46 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-06-24 4:05 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-06-24 6:04 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-06-24 23:44 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-06-24 23:58 ` Luck, Tony
2026-06-25 0:24 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-06-25 14:59 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-06-25 14:33 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-06-25 15:54 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-06-13 7:57 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] x86/resctrl: Parse ACPI CMRC table Chen Yu
2026-06-13 7:57 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] x86/resctrl: Rename prev_msr to prev_mon_val Chen Yu
2026-06-18 23:39 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-06-22 12:42 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-06-22 21:29 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-06-23 7:48 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-06-23 16:47 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-06-24 6:16 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-06-13 7:57 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] x86/resctrl: Refactor the monitor read function Chen Yu
2026-06-13 7:57 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] fs/resctrl: Do not invoke smp_processor_id() in preemptible context Chen Yu
2026-06-13 7:57 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] x86/resctrl: Add support for L3 occupancy monitoring via RMID MMIO read Chen Yu
2026-06-18 23:40 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-06-22 14:09 ` Chen, Yu C [this message]
2026-06-22 21:30 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-06-23 5:00 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-06-23 16:48 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-06-24 9:00 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-06-24 23:44 ` Reinette Chatre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=04f67dbd-43ed-4863-a51f-cf75e9a02e55@intel.com \
--to=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
--cc=anil.keshavamurthy@broadcom.com \
--cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dave.martin@arm.com \
--cc=fenghuay@nvidia.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox