mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Yu Kuai <yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>
Cc: hch@infradead.org, axboe@kernel.dk, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yi.zhang@huawei.com,
	yangerkun@huawei.com, "yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next RFC 2/3] block: factor out the setting of GD_NEED_PART_SCAN
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2023 09:44:09 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0b7d6c92-e07f-c9c1-9afd-e5cea5e3aac0@huaweicloud.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230216131725.oddv27a7fhz6hx7x@quack3>

Hi, jan!

在 2023/02/16 21:17, Jan Kara 写道:
> On Sun 12-02-23 17:26:40, Yu Kuai wrote:
>> From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
>>
>> In order to prevent scan partition for a device that is opened
>> exclusively by someone else, new conditions will be added to
>> disk_scan_partitions() in the next patch. Hence if device is opened
>> exclusively between bdev_add() and disk_scan_partitions(), the first
>> partition scan will fail unexpected. This patch factor out the setting
>> of GD_NEED_PART_SCAN to prevent the problem.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
> 
> I'd rather leave the setting of GD_NEED_PART_SCAN in disk_scan_partitions()
> to keep it self-contained. On top of that we can set GD_NEED_PART_SCAN in
> device_add_disk() to ensure initial partition scan but we should probably
> also make sure flags like GD_SUPPRESS_PART_SCAN or GENHD_FL_NO_PART are not
> set to avoid unwanted partition scanning.

Thanks for the suggestion, I'll remove this patch and do that in patch 3
in the next version.

Thanks,
Kuai
> 
> 								Honza
> 
>> ---
>>   block/genhd.c | 2 +-
>>   block/ioctl.c | 1 +
>>   2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/block/genhd.c b/block/genhd.c
>> index 075d8da284f5..c0d1220bd798 100644
>> --- a/block/genhd.c
>> +++ b/block/genhd.c
>> @@ -367,7 +367,6 @@ int disk_scan_partitions(struct gendisk *disk, fmode_t mode)
>>   	if (disk->open_partitions)
>>   		return -EBUSY;
>>   
>> -	set_bit(GD_NEED_PART_SCAN, &disk->state);
>>   	bdev = blkdev_get_by_dev(disk_devt(disk), mode, NULL);
>>   	if (IS_ERR(bdev))
>>   		return PTR_ERR(bdev);
>> @@ -493,6 +492,7 @@ int __must_check device_add_disk(struct device *parent, struct gendisk *disk,
>>   		if (ret)
>>   			goto out_unregister_bdi;
>>   
>> +		set_bit(GD_NEED_PART_SCAN, &disk->state);
>>   		bdev_add(disk->part0, ddev->devt);
>>   		if (get_capacity(disk))
>>   			disk_scan_partitions(disk, FMODE_READ);
>> diff --git a/block/ioctl.c b/block/ioctl.c
>> index 6dd49d877584..0eefcdb936a0 100644
>> --- a/block/ioctl.c
>> +++ b/block/ioctl.c
>> @@ -528,6 +528,7 @@ static int blkdev_common_ioctl(struct block_device *bdev, fmode_t mode,
>>   			return -EACCES;
>>   		if (bdev_is_partition(bdev))
>>   			return -EINVAL;
>> +		set_bit(GD_NEED_PART_SCAN, &bdev->bd_disk->state);
>>   		return disk_scan_partitions(bdev->bd_disk, mode & ~FMODE_EXCL);
>>   	case BLKTRACESTART:
>>   	case BLKTRACESTOP:
>> -- 
>> 2.31.1
>>


  reply	other threads:[~2023-02-17  1:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-12  9:26 [PATCH -next RFC 0/3] block: fix scan partition for exclusively open device again Yu Kuai
2023-02-12  9:26 ` [PATCH -next RFC 1/3] block: Revert "block: Do not reread partition table on exclusively open device" Yu Kuai
2023-02-12  9:26 ` [PATCH -next RFC 2/3] block: factor out the setting of GD_NEED_PART_SCAN Yu Kuai
2023-02-12 11:36   ` Hannes Reinecke
2023-02-13  2:41     ` Yu Kuai
2023-02-16 13:17   ` Jan Kara
2023-02-17  1:44     ` Yu Kuai [this message]
2023-02-12  9:26 ` [PATCH -next RFC 3/3] block: fix scan partition for exclusively open device again Yu Kuai
2023-02-16 13:19   ` Jan Kara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0b7d6c92-e07f-c9c1-9afd-e5cea5e3aac0@huaweicloud.com \
    --to=yukuai1@huaweicloud.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yangerkun@huawei.com \
    --cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
    --cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®