mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>,
	hch@infradead.org, jack@suse.cz, axboe@kernel.dk
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	yukuai3@huawei.com, yi.zhang@huawei.com, yangerkun@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next RFC 2/3] block: factor out the setting of GD_NEED_PART_SCAN
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2023 12:36:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9b0b9059-c0f6-df5b-863a-987970f3567d@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230212092641.2394146-3-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>

On 2/12/23 10:26, Yu Kuai wrote:
> From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
> 
> In order to prevent scan partition for a device that is opened
> exclusively by someone else, new conditions will be added to
> disk_scan_partitions() in the next patch. Hence if device is opened
> exclusively between bdev_add() and disk_scan_partitions(), the first
> partition scan will fail unexpected. This patch factor out the setting
> of GD_NEED_PART_SCAN to prevent the problem.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
> ---
>   block/genhd.c | 2 +-
>   block/ioctl.c | 1 +
>   2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/block/genhd.c b/block/genhd.c
> index 075d8da284f5..c0d1220bd798 100644
> --- a/block/genhd.c
> +++ b/block/genhd.c
> @@ -367,7 +367,6 @@ int disk_scan_partitions(struct gendisk *disk, fmode_t mode)
>   	if (disk->open_partitions)
>   		return -EBUSY;
>   
> -	set_bit(GD_NEED_PART_SCAN, &disk->state);
>   	bdev = blkdev_get_by_dev(disk_devt(disk), mode, NULL);
>   	if (IS_ERR(bdev))
>   		return PTR_ERR(bdev);
> @@ -493,6 +492,7 @@ int __must_check device_add_disk(struct device *parent, struct gendisk *disk,
>   		if (ret)
>   			goto out_unregister_bdi;
>   
> +		set_bit(GD_NEED_PART_SCAN, &disk->state);
>   		bdev_add(disk->part0, ddev->devt);
>   		if (get_capacity(disk))
>   			disk_scan_partitions(disk, FMODE_READ);
Usual caveat:
What happens if the flag is already set here?
Wouldn't that imply that another scan is underway?
And wouldn't it be better to use 'test_and_set()'?


> diff --git a/block/ioctl.c b/block/ioctl.c
> index 6dd49d877584..0eefcdb936a0 100644
> --- a/block/ioctl.c
> +++ b/block/ioctl.c
> @@ -528,6 +528,7 @@ static int blkdev_common_ioctl(struct block_device *bdev, fmode_t mode,
>   			return -EACCES;
>   		if (bdev_is_partition(bdev))
>   			return -EINVAL;
> +		set_bit(GD_NEED_PART_SCAN, &bdev->bd_disk->state);
>   		return disk_scan_partitions(bdev->bd_disk, mode & ~FMODE_EXCL);
>   	case BLKTRACESTART:
>   	case BLKTRACESTOP:
Similar here.

Cheers,

Hannes
-- 
Dr. Hannes Reinecke                Kernel Storage Architect
hare@suse.de                              +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), Geschäftsführer: Ivo Totev, Andrew
Myers, Andrew McDonald, Martje Boudien Moerman


  reply	other threads:[~2023-02-12 11:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-12  9:26 [PATCH -next RFC 0/3] block: fix scan partition for exclusively open device again Yu Kuai
2023-02-12  9:26 ` [PATCH -next RFC 1/3] block: Revert "block: Do not reread partition table on exclusively open device" Yu Kuai
2023-02-12  9:26 ` [PATCH -next RFC 2/3] block: factor out the setting of GD_NEED_PART_SCAN Yu Kuai
2023-02-12 11:36   ` Hannes Reinecke [this message]
2023-02-13  2:41     ` Yu Kuai
2023-02-16 13:17   ` Jan Kara
2023-02-17  1:44     ` Yu Kuai
2023-02-12  9:26 ` [PATCH -next RFC 3/3] block: fix scan partition for exclusively open device again Yu Kuai
2023-02-16 13:19   ` Jan Kara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9b0b9059-c0f6-df5b-863a-987970f3567d@suse.de \
    --to=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yangerkun@huawei.com \
    --cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
    --cc=yukuai1@huaweicloud.com \
    --cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®