From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
To: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Cc: Dave Miller <davem@redhat.com>,
axboe@suse.de, bzolnier@gmail.com,
james.steward@dynamicratings.com, jgarzik@pobox.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mattjreimer@gmail.com,
rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET] block: fix PIO cache coherency bug
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 10:12:51 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1142871172.3283.17.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060222082732.GA24320@htj.dyndns.org>
On Wed, 2006-02-22 at 17:27 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> \This thread has been dead for quite some time mainly because I didn't
> know what to do. As it is a real outstanding bug bugging people and
> Matt Reimer thankfully reminded me[1], I'm giving another shot at
> resolving this.
>
> People seem to agree that it is the responsibility of the driver to
> make sure read data gets to the page cache page (or whatever kernel
> page). Only driver knows how and when.
>
> The objection raised by James Bottomley is that although syncing the
> kernel page is the responsbility of the driver, syncing user page is
> not; thus, use of flush_dcache_page() is excessive. James suggested
> use of flush_kernel_dcache_page().
>
> I also asked similar question[2] on lkml and Russell replied that
> depending on arch implementation it shouldn't be much of a problem[3].
> Another thing to consider is that all other drivers which currently
> manage cache coherency use flush_dcache_page().
>
> So, the questions are...
>
> q1. James, besides from the use of flush_dcache_page(), do you agree
> with the block layer kmap/kunmap API?
>
> 2. Is flush_kernel_dcache_page() the correct one?
>
> Whether or not flush_kernel_dcache_page() is the one or not, I think
> we should first go with flush_dcache_page() as that's what drivers
> have been doing upto this point. Switching from flush_dcache_page()
> to flush_kernel_dcache_page() is very easy and should be done in a
> separate patch anyway. No?
>
> Another thing mind is that this problem is not limited block drivers.
> All the codes that perform writes to kmap'ed pages take care of
> synchronization themselves and the popular choice seems to be
> flush_dcache_page().
>
> IMHO, kmap API should have a flag or something to tell it how the page
> is being used such that kmap API can take care of synchronization like
> dma mapping API does rather than scattering sync code all over the
> kernel. And if that's the right thing to do, some of blk kmap
> wrappers can/should be removed.
>
> What do you guys think?
Here's my proposal to break this logjam.
I'm proposing introducing a new memory coherency API:
flush_kernel_dcache_page()
Which would be tasked with bringing cache coherency back to the kernel's
image of a user page after the kernel has modified it. On parisc this
will be a simple flush through the kernel cache.
I think on arm this should be implemented as
__cpuc_flush_dcache_page(page_address(page))
but you can implement this as flush_dcache_page() if you wish (I warn
you now that you have the same flush_dcache_mmap_lock problem that we
have on parisc, so if you do this, you'll return from
flush_dcache_page() with interrupts enabled, but at least this will no
longer be a parisc problem).
If everyone's happy with this approach, I'll take it over to linux-arch.
James
diff --git a/Documentation/cachetlb.txt b/Documentation/cachetlb.txt
index 4ae4188..6232dd7 100644
--- a/Documentation/cachetlb.txt
+++ b/Documentation/cachetlb.txt
@@ -362,6 +362,15 @@ maps this page at its virtual address.
likely that you will need to flush the instruction cache
for copy_to_user_page().
+ void flush_kernel_dcache_page(struct page *page)
+ When the kernel needs to modify a user page is has obtained
+ with kmap, it calls this function after all modifications are
+ complete (but before kunmapping it) to bring the underlying
+ page up to date. It is assumed here that the user has no
+ incoherent cached copies (i.e. the original page was obtained
+ from a mechanism like get_user_pages())
+
+
void flush_icache_range(unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
When the kernel stores into addresses that it will execute
out of (eg when loading modules), this function is called.
diff --git a/include/linux/highmem.h b/include/linux/highmem.h
index 6bece92..157bd2f 100644
--- a/include/linux/highmem.h
+++ b/include/linux/highmem.h
@@ -7,6 +7,12 @@
#include <asm/cacheflush.h>
+#ifndef ARCH_HAS_FLUSH_KERNEL_DCACHE_PAGE
+static inline void flush_kernel_dcache_page(struct page *page)
+{
+}
+#endif
+
#ifdef CONFIG_HIGHMEM
#include <asm/highmem.h>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-20 16:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-13 15:24 Tejun Heo
2006-01-13 15:24 ` [PATCH 1/8] highmem: include asm/kmap_types.h in linux/highmem.h Tejun Heo
2006-01-13 15:24 ` [PATCH 3/8] block: convert bio kmap helpers to use blk_kmap helpers Tejun Heo
2006-01-13 15:24 ` [PATCH 2/8] block: implement blk kmap helpers Tejun Heo
2006-01-13 15:24 ` [PATCH 4/8] block: convert IDE to use blk_kmap helpers Tejun Heo
2006-02-14 19:07 ` Matt Reimer
2006-02-15 2:05 ` Tejun Heo
2006-02-16 18:01 ` Russell King
2006-02-16 18:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-02-16 19:02 ` Russell King
2006-01-13 15:24 ` [PATCH 5/8] block: convert libata " Tejun Heo
2006-01-13 15:24 ` [PATCH 7/8] block: convert block/rd.c " Tejun Heo
2006-01-13 15:24 ` [PATCH 6/8] block: convert scsi " Tejun Heo
2006-01-13 15:24 ` [PATCH 8/8] block: convert md " Tejun Heo
2006-01-13 15:37 ` [PATCHSET] block: fix PIO cache coherency bug Jens Axboe
2006-01-13 15:47 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2006-01-13 15:50 ` James Bottomley
2006-01-13 18:20 ` Russell King
2006-01-13 18:35 ` James Bottomley
2006-01-13 19:06 ` Russell King
2006-02-22 8:27 ` Tejun Heo
2006-03-02 18:46 ` James Bottomley
2006-03-02 20:30 ` Russell King
2006-03-02 20:43 ` James Bottomley
2006-03-02 20:57 ` Russell King
2006-03-02 20:44 ` Jens Axboe
2006-05-29 19:17 ` Nicolas Pitre
2006-05-30 11:19 ` Tejun Heo
2006-05-30 21:07 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2006-05-30 21:32 ` Nicolas Pitre
2006-05-31 0:57 ` David S. Miller
2006-03-02 20:40 ` Jens Axboe
2006-03-20 16:12 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2006-03-20 16:26 ` Tejun Heo
2006-03-20 16:33 ` James Bottomley
2006-03-20 16:40 ` Tejun Heo
2006-03-20 16:48 ` James Bottomley
2006-03-23 14:23 ` James Bottomley
2006-03-20 16:50 ` Randy.Dunlap
2006-03-20 16:52 ` James Bottomley
2006-01-13 22:02 ` Russell King
2006-01-13 22:38 ` James Bottomley
2006-01-13 22:43 ` David S. Miller
2006-01-14 4:58 ` James Bottomley
2006-01-17 15:00 ` Jeff Garzik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1142871172.3283.17.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com \
--to=james.bottomley@steeleye.com \
--cc=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=bzolnier@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=james.steward@dynamicratings.com \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mattjreimer@gmail.com \
--cc=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®