mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
To: Satyam Sharma <satyam.sharma@gmail.com>
Cc: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
	"Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@mindspring.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely module?
Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 09:31:36 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1179153096.3703.23.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a781481a0705140523y789e012bj2ec317565e34366f@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, 2007-05-14 at 17:53 +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote:
> > I guess this is probably the behaviour that James wanted originally?

No ... you're still not reading the explanation in the thread:

The wait scan module is designed to wait for scans of driver modules.
Whether SCSI=y or m has no effect on this ... you can still have modular
drivers with built in SCSI.

> > Anyway, attached patch (subsumes previous one) cleans up all this.
> > Now, scsi_wait_scan is the only guy who controls waiting upon async
> > scans to complete:
> >
> > If SCSI=n, SCSI_WAIT_SCAN=n, obviously.
> >
> > If SCSI=y, SCSI_WAIT_SCAN=y, so it gets built-in and is run at
> > late_initcall.
> >
> > If SCSI=m, SCSI_WAIT_SCAN=m too and would hopefully be run
> > by the initrd/initramfs scripts to wait for async SCSI bus scans to
> > finish before allowing the boot to proceed.
> >
> > [ Attached patch does _not_ expose SCSI_WAIT_SCAN to the
> > user at kernel configuration time, so if somebody wants it to be
> > built as a module even when SCSI=y (why would anybody
> > want that, doesn't make much sense to me to modprobe
> > scsi_wait_scan _after_ boot-up), it would not be possible to
> > do so. But if someone really wants that, let me know, we can
> > add a depends, tristate "..." and help in this Kconfig option to
> > accomplish that too. ]
> 
> This has sadly become a one-person thread, but Robert informs
> me in private mail that we can further clean/simplify the patch:
> 
> [subsumes both previous patches]
> 
> Signed-off-by: Satyam Sharma <satyam.sharma@gmail.com>
> 
> ---
> 
>  drivers/scsi/Kconfig     |    3 +--
>  drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c |    5 +----
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> ---
> 
> diff -ruNp a/drivers/scsi/Kconfig b/drivers/scsi/Kconfig
> --- a/drivers/scsi/Kconfig	2007-05-10 23:19:32.000000000 +0530
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/Kconfig	2007-05-14 17:59:51.000000000 +0530
> @@ -243,9 +243,8 @@ config SCSI_SCAN_ASYNC
> 
>  config SCSI_WAIT_SCAN
>  	tristate
> -	default m
>  	depends on SCSI
> -	depends on MODULES
> +	default SCSI
> 
>  menu "SCSI Transports"
>  	depends on SCSI
> diff -ruNp a/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c
> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c	2007-05-14 16:06:43.000000000 +0530
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c	2007-05-14 16:10:34.000000000 +0530
> @@ -184,14 +184,11 @@ int scsi_complete_async_scans(void)
>  /* Only exported for the benefit of scsi_wait_scan */
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(scsi_complete_async_scans);
> 
> -#ifndef MODULE
>  /*
>   * For async scanning we need to wait for all the scans to complete before
>   * trying to mount the root fs.  Otherwise non-modular drivers may not be ready
> - * yet.
> + * yet.  This is done by scsi_wait_scan.
>   */
> -late_initcall(scsi_complete_async_scans);
> -#endif

This is actually not in mainline.  It's an incorrect patch in -mm.  The
problem with late_initcall is that they queue in link order ... so any
SCSI module (and there a few) linked after this won't benefit from it.
The obvious hack is to have a separate file with this in the final link.
However, Matthew Wilcox thinks he can do better.

James



  reply	other threads:[~2007-05-14 14:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-05-13 15:22 Robert P. J. Day
2007-05-13 15:58 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-13 16:06 ` Dave Jones
2007-05-13 16:10   ` James Bottomley
2007-05-13 16:18     ` James Bottomley
2007-05-13 16:30       ` Dave Jones
2007-05-14  9:35       ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-14  9:45         ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-14 12:00           ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-14 12:23             ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-14 14:31               ` James Bottomley [this message]
2007-05-15  0:41                 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-15 11:26                   ` Simon Arlott
2007-05-15 12:02                     ` Asynchronous scsi scanning Matthew Wilcox
2007-05-15 16:30                       ` Simon Arlott
2007-05-15 17:29                         ` Matthew Wilcox
2007-05-15 21:56                           ` [PATCH] SCSI: Let users disable SCSI_WAIT_SCAN to be built Stefan Richter
2007-05-16 14:43                             ` Stefan Richter
2007-05-17 14:00                               ` James Bottomley
2007-05-17 17:02                                 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-15 23:27                           ` Asynchronous scsi scanning Satyam Sharma
2007-05-15 23:28                             ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-05-15 23:49                               ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-16  2:51                             ` Matthew Wilcox
2007-05-16  2:59                               ` Roland Dreier
2007-05-17 17:13                               ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-17 17:20                                 ` Matthew Wilcox
2007-05-17 17:41                                   ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-17 18:24                                     ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-05-17 18:47                                       ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-17 18:51                                         ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-05-17 19:04                                           ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-17 19:39                                             ` Matthew Wilcox
2007-05-17 19:43                                               ` Benjamin LaHaise
2007-05-17 21:30                                                 ` Matthew Wilcox
2007-05-17 21:42                                                   ` Dave Jones
2007-05-17 22:00                                                     ` Peter Jones
2007-05-18 14:00                                                       ` Stefan Richter
2007-05-18  5:28                                                   ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-18 11:24                                                     ` Matthew Wilcox
2007-05-18 13:14                                                       ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-18  3:41                                                 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-18 11:19                                                   ` Matthew Wilcox
2007-05-18 13:06                                                     ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-17 17:32                             ` sysfs makes scaling suck " Benjamin LaHaise
2007-05-17 17:45                               ` James Bottomley
2007-05-17 17:49                                 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2007-05-19 16:30                                   ` Greg KH
2007-05-17 22:24                       ` Peter Jones
2007-05-13 16:20     ` why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely module? Robert P. J. Day
2007-05-13 16:27       ` James Bottomley
2007-05-13 16:37         ` Robert P. J. Day
2007-05-13 17:42         ` Simon Arlott
2007-05-13 17:48           ` James Bottomley
2007-05-13 18:26             ` Simon Arlott
2007-05-13 18:45               ` Dave Jones
2007-05-13 18:45               ` James Bottomley
2007-05-14 17:29             ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-14 18:46               ` Alan Cox
2007-05-14 20:06                 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-13 16:28     ` Dave Jones
2007-05-13 20:38     ` Simon Arlott

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1179153096.3703.23.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com \
    --to=james.bottomley@steeleye.com \
    --cc=davej@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rpjday@mindspring.com \
    --cc=satyam.sharma@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®