mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Satyam Sharma" <satyam.sharma@gmail.com>
To: "James Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@steeleye.com>
Cc: "Dave Jones" <davej@redhat.com>,
	"Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@mindspring.com>,
	"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely module?
Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 15:05:16 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a781481a0705140235h6a96563cw63ed2c7a85a4f736@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1179073116.3723.45.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com>

Hi,

On 5/13/07, James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@steeleye.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-05-13 at 11:10 -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > -   depends on SCSI
> > > +   depends on SCSI_SCAN_ASYNC

This is incorrect, alright, but not because of any of the reasons James
mentions below.

The only reason why some module (or Kconfig option) should _depend_
on some other Kconfig option is if (*and only if*) it re-uses _code_
exported by said dependency.

In this particular case, SCSI_SCAN_ASYNC=y/n only controls the
default value of some variable somewhere in SCSI, so no other code
can meaningfully "depend" on it.

> > No.  SCSI_SCAN_ASYNC is a bool ... if you depend on it, you'll force the
> > wait scan to be built in, which isn't the idea at all.

Umm, this isn't true, actually.

> Plus SCSI_SCAN_ASYNC only sets the *default* for async scanning.  You
> can alter this at boot time, so you could need the wait scan module even
> with it set to N.

I think the _correct_ way to handle this situation (and which would make
everyone happy here; Robert can get his module-free builds with defconfig,
James gets his SCSI_WAIT_SCAN module even if nobody asked for it
explicitly) would be as follows:

---

Clean up Kconfig entry for CONFIG_SCSI_WAIT_SCAN.

Signed-off-by: Satyam Sharma <satyam.sharma@gmail.com>

---

 drivers/scsi/Kconfig |    5 ++---
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

---

diff -ruNp a/drivers/scsi/Kconfig b/drivers/scsi/Kconfig
--- a/drivers/scsi/Kconfig	2007-05-10 23:19:32.000000000 +0530
+++ b/drivers/scsi/Kconfig	2007-05-14 15:12:46.000000000 +0530
@@ -243,9 +243,8 @@ config SCSI_SCAN_ASYNC

 config SCSI_WAIT_SCAN
 	tristate
-	default m
-	depends on SCSI
-	depends on MODULES
+	default m if SCSI=m
+	default n

 menu "SCSI Transports"
 	depends on SCSI

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-05-14  9:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-05-13 15:22 Robert P. J. Day
2007-05-13 15:58 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-13 16:06 ` Dave Jones
2007-05-13 16:10   ` James Bottomley
2007-05-13 16:18     ` James Bottomley
2007-05-13 16:30       ` Dave Jones
2007-05-14  9:35       ` Satyam Sharma [this message]
2007-05-14  9:45         ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-14 12:00           ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-14 12:23             ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-14 14:31               ` James Bottomley
2007-05-15  0:41                 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-15 11:26                   ` Simon Arlott
2007-05-15 12:02                     ` Asynchronous scsi scanning Matthew Wilcox
2007-05-15 16:30                       ` Simon Arlott
2007-05-15 17:29                         ` Matthew Wilcox
2007-05-15 21:56                           ` [PATCH] SCSI: Let users disable SCSI_WAIT_SCAN to be built Stefan Richter
2007-05-16 14:43                             ` Stefan Richter
2007-05-17 14:00                               ` James Bottomley
2007-05-17 17:02                                 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-15 23:27                           ` Asynchronous scsi scanning Satyam Sharma
2007-05-15 23:28                             ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-05-15 23:49                               ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-16  2:51                             ` Matthew Wilcox
2007-05-16  2:59                               ` Roland Dreier
2007-05-17 17:13                               ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-17 17:20                                 ` Matthew Wilcox
2007-05-17 17:41                                   ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-17 18:24                                     ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-05-17 18:47                                       ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-17 18:51                                         ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-05-17 19:04                                           ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-17 19:39                                             ` Matthew Wilcox
2007-05-17 19:43                                               ` Benjamin LaHaise
2007-05-17 21:30                                                 ` Matthew Wilcox
2007-05-17 21:42                                                   ` Dave Jones
2007-05-17 22:00                                                     ` Peter Jones
2007-05-18 14:00                                                       ` Stefan Richter
2007-05-18  5:28                                                   ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-18 11:24                                                     ` Matthew Wilcox
2007-05-18 13:14                                                       ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-18  3:41                                                 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-18 11:19                                                   ` Matthew Wilcox
2007-05-18 13:06                                                     ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-17 17:32                             ` sysfs makes scaling suck " Benjamin LaHaise
2007-05-17 17:45                               ` James Bottomley
2007-05-17 17:49                                 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2007-05-19 16:30                                   ` Greg KH
2007-05-17 22:24                       ` Peter Jones
2007-05-13 16:20     ` why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely module? Robert P. J. Day
2007-05-13 16:27       ` James Bottomley
2007-05-13 16:37         ` Robert P. J. Day
2007-05-13 17:42         ` Simon Arlott
2007-05-13 17:48           ` James Bottomley
2007-05-13 18:26             ` Simon Arlott
2007-05-13 18:45               ` Dave Jones
2007-05-13 18:45               ` James Bottomley
2007-05-14 17:29             ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-14 18:46               ` Alan Cox
2007-05-14 20:06                 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-13 16:28     ` Dave Jones
2007-05-13 20:38     ` Simon Arlott

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a781481a0705140235h6a96563cw63ed2c7a85a4f736@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=satyam.sharma@gmail.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@steeleye.com \
    --cc=davej@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rpjday@mindspring.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®