From: "Satyam Sharma" <satyam.sharma@gmail.com>
To: "James Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@steeleye.com>
Cc: "Dave Jones" <davej@redhat.com>,
"Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@mindspring.com>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely module?
Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 15:05:16 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a781481a0705140235h6a96563cw63ed2c7a85a4f736@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1179073116.3723.45.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com>
Hi,
On 5/13/07, James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@steeleye.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-05-13 at 11:10 -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > - depends on SCSI
> > > + depends on SCSI_SCAN_ASYNC
This is incorrect, alright, but not because of any of the reasons James
mentions below.
The only reason why some module (or Kconfig option) should _depend_
on some other Kconfig option is if (*and only if*) it re-uses _code_
exported by said dependency.
In this particular case, SCSI_SCAN_ASYNC=y/n only controls the
default value of some variable somewhere in SCSI, so no other code
can meaningfully "depend" on it.
> > No. SCSI_SCAN_ASYNC is a bool ... if you depend on it, you'll force the
> > wait scan to be built in, which isn't the idea at all.
Umm, this isn't true, actually.
> Plus SCSI_SCAN_ASYNC only sets the *default* for async scanning. You
> can alter this at boot time, so you could need the wait scan module even
> with it set to N.
I think the _correct_ way to handle this situation (and which would make
everyone happy here; Robert can get his module-free builds with defconfig,
James gets his SCSI_WAIT_SCAN module even if nobody asked for it
explicitly) would be as follows:
---
Clean up Kconfig entry for CONFIG_SCSI_WAIT_SCAN.
Signed-off-by: Satyam Sharma <satyam.sharma@gmail.com>
---
drivers/scsi/Kconfig | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff -ruNp a/drivers/scsi/Kconfig b/drivers/scsi/Kconfig
--- a/drivers/scsi/Kconfig 2007-05-10 23:19:32.000000000 +0530
+++ b/drivers/scsi/Kconfig 2007-05-14 15:12:46.000000000 +0530
@@ -243,9 +243,8 @@ config SCSI_SCAN_ASYNC
config SCSI_WAIT_SCAN
tristate
- default m
- depends on SCSI
- depends on MODULES
+ default m if SCSI=m
+ default n
menu "SCSI Transports"
depends on SCSI
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-14 9:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-13 15:22 Robert P. J. Day
2007-05-13 15:58 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-13 16:06 ` Dave Jones
2007-05-13 16:10 ` James Bottomley
2007-05-13 16:18 ` James Bottomley
2007-05-13 16:30 ` Dave Jones
2007-05-14 9:35 ` Satyam Sharma [this message]
2007-05-14 9:45 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-14 12:00 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-14 12:23 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-14 14:31 ` James Bottomley
2007-05-15 0:41 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-15 11:26 ` Simon Arlott
2007-05-15 12:02 ` Asynchronous scsi scanning Matthew Wilcox
2007-05-15 16:30 ` Simon Arlott
2007-05-15 17:29 ` Matthew Wilcox
2007-05-15 21:56 ` [PATCH] SCSI: Let users disable SCSI_WAIT_SCAN to be built Stefan Richter
2007-05-16 14:43 ` Stefan Richter
2007-05-17 14:00 ` James Bottomley
2007-05-17 17:02 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-15 23:27 ` Asynchronous scsi scanning Satyam Sharma
2007-05-15 23:28 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-05-15 23:49 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-16 2:51 ` Matthew Wilcox
2007-05-16 2:59 ` Roland Dreier
2007-05-17 17:13 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-17 17:20 ` Matthew Wilcox
2007-05-17 17:41 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-17 18:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-05-17 18:47 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-17 18:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-05-17 19:04 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-17 19:39 ` Matthew Wilcox
2007-05-17 19:43 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2007-05-17 21:30 ` Matthew Wilcox
2007-05-17 21:42 ` Dave Jones
2007-05-17 22:00 ` Peter Jones
2007-05-18 14:00 ` Stefan Richter
2007-05-18 5:28 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-18 11:24 ` Matthew Wilcox
2007-05-18 13:14 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-18 3:41 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-18 11:19 ` Matthew Wilcox
2007-05-18 13:06 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-17 17:32 ` sysfs makes scaling suck " Benjamin LaHaise
2007-05-17 17:45 ` James Bottomley
2007-05-17 17:49 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2007-05-19 16:30 ` Greg KH
2007-05-17 22:24 ` Peter Jones
2007-05-13 16:20 ` why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely module? Robert P. J. Day
2007-05-13 16:27 ` James Bottomley
2007-05-13 16:37 ` Robert P. J. Day
2007-05-13 17:42 ` Simon Arlott
2007-05-13 17:48 ` James Bottomley
2007-05-13 18:26 ` Simon Arlott
2007-05-13 18:45 ` Dave Jones
2007-05-13 18:45 ` James Bottomley
2007-05-14 17:29 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-14 18:46 ` Alan Cox
2007-05-14 20:06 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-13 16:28 ` Dave Jones
2007-05-13 20:38 ` Simon Arlott
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a781481a0705140235h6a96563cw63ed2c7a85a4f736@mail.gmail.com \
--to=satyam.sharma@gmail.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@steeleye.com \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rpjday@mindspring.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®