From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>,
Simon Arlott <simon@fire.lp0.eu>,
"Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@mindspring.com>,
Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely module?
Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 19:46:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070514194614.4f00655d@the-village.bc.nu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0705141928230.9570@yvahk01.tjqt.qr>
On Mon, 14 May 2007 19:29:12 +0200 (MEST)
Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de> wrote:
>
> On May 13 2007 12:48, James Bottomley wrote:
> >
> >> Why does ATA select SCSI anyway? Surely PATA doesn't require it?
> >
> >That's a bit offtopic and to the wrong list.
> >
> >libata-pata does require SCSI ...
>
> And in the long run, that SCSI parts which are actually used by ATA
> should be factored out so that SCSI really is SCSI again, and not
> "Common layer for SCSI, SATA and PATA" or so.
The common layer for the queueing is one thing, but the ATAPI devices
(CD-ROM etc) are SCSI commands over an ATA bus. A subset of SCSI commands
badly over an ATA bus but SCSI commands nevertheless - so they have the
same basic dependancies as USB storage does.
Alan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-14 18:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-13 15:22 Robert P. J. Day
2007-05-13 15:58 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-13 16:06 ` Dave Jones
2007-05-13 16:10 ` James Bottomley
2007-05-13 16:18 ` James Bottomley
2007-05-13 16:30 ` Dave Jones
2007-05-14 9:35 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-14 9:45 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-14 12:00 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-14 12:23 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-14 14:31 ` James Bottomley
2007-05-15 0:41 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-15 11:26 ` Simon Arlott
2007-05-15 12:02 ` Asynchronous scsi scanning Matthew Wilcox
2007-05-15 16:30 ` Simon Arlott
2007-05-15 17:29 ` Matthew Wilcox
2007-05-15 21:56 ` [PATCH] SCSI: Let users disable SCSI_WAIT_SCAN to be built Stefan Richter
2007-05-16 14:43 ` Stefan Richter
2007-05-17 14:00 ` James Bottomley
2007-05-17 17:02 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-15 23:27 ` Asynchronous scsi scanning Satyam Sharma
2007-05-15 23:28 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-05-15 23:49 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-16 2:51 ` Matthew Wilcox
2007-05-16 2:59 ` Roland Dreier
2007-05-17 17:13 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-17 17:20 ` Matthew Wilcox
2007-05-17 17:41 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-17 18:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-05-17 18:47 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-17 18:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-05-17 19:04 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-17 19:39 ` Matthew Wilcox
2007-05-17 19:43 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2007-05-17 21:30 ` Matthew Wilcox
2007-05-17 21:42 ` Dave Jones
2007-05-17 22:00 ` Peter Jones
2007-05-18 14:00 ` Stefan Richter
2007-05-18 5:28 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-18 11:24 ` Matthew Wilcox
2007-05-18 13:14 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-18 3:41 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-18 11:19 ` Matthew Wilcox
2007-05-18 13:06 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-17 17:32 ` sysfs makes scaling suck " Benjamin LaHaise
2007-05-17 17:45 ` James Bottomley
2007-05-17 17:49 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2007-05-19 16:30 ` Greg KH
2007-05-17 22:24 ` Peter Jones
2007-05-13 16:20 ` why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely module? Robert P. J. Day
2007-05-13 16:27 ` James Bottomley
2007-05-13 16:37 ` Robert P. J. Day
2007-05-13 17:42 ` Simon Arlott
2007-05-13 17:48 ` James Bottomley
2007-05-13 18:26 ` Simon Arlott
2007-05-13 18:45 ` Dave Jones
2007-05-13 18:45 ` James Bottomley
2007-05-14 17:29 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-14 18:46 ` Alan Cox [this message]
2007-05-14 20:06 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-13 16:28 ` Dave Jones
2007-05-13 20:38 ` Simon Arlott
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070514194614.4f00655d@the-village.bc.nu \
--to=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rpjday@mindspring.com \
--cc=simon@fire.lp0.eu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®