mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Simon Arlott <simon@fire.lp0.eu>,
	James Bottomley <james.bottomley@steeleye.com>,
	Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	kernel-packagers@vger.kernel.org, Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SCSI: Let users disable SCSI_WAIT_SCAN to be built
Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 16:43:18 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <464B1886.1060502@s5r6.in-berlin.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <tkrat.99c0f1a1898aa67f@s5r6.in-berlin.de>

I wrote:
> --- linux-2.6.22-rc1.orig/drivers/scsi/Kconfig
> +++ linux-2.6.22-rc1/drivers/scsi/Kconfig
> @@ -241,11 +241,19 @@ config SCSI_SCAN_ASYNC
>  	  You can override this choice by specifying "scsi_mod.scan=sync"
>  	  or async on the kernel's command line.
>  
> -config SCSI_WAIT_SCAN
> +config SCSI_WAIT_SCAN_NO_Y
>  	tristate
>  	default m
> -	depends on SCSI
> -	depends on MODULES

SCSI_WAIT_SCAN_NO_Y is unnecessary, as Randy Dunlap pointed out in "Re:
How to force Kconfig tristate into range n..m?".
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/15/320

> +
> +config SCSI_WAIT_SCAN
> +	tristate "Pseudo driver which waits for SCSI scanning to finish"
> +	depends on MODULES && SCSI && SCSI_WAIT_SCAN_NO_Y

	depends on SCSI && m

> +	help
> +	  When loaded, this module will do nothing else than wait for
> +	  SCSI low-level drivers to finish asynchronous scanning.
> +	  The module will be called scsi_wait_scan.

There should be explained that it is the command "modprobe
scsi_wait_scan" which is doing the waiting, and that this is useful or
required in initrds.

> +	  Most people can say n here.

This sentence should probably be omitted, as it may be wrong in the
future and unsafe already now.

I will resend an updated patch.
-- 
Stefan Richter
-=====-=-=== -=-= =----
http://arcgraph.de/sr/

  reply	other threads:[~2007-05-16 14:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-05-13 15:22 why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely module? Robert P. J. Day
2007-05-13 15:58 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-13 16:06 ` Dave Jones
2007-05-13 16:10   ` James Bottomley
2007-05-13 16:18     ` James Bottomley
2007-05-13 16:30       ` Dave Jones
2007-05-14  9:35       ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-14  9:45         ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-14 12:00           ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-14 12:23             ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-14 14:31               ` James Bottomley
2007-05-15  0:41                 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-15 11:26                   ` Simon Arlott
2007-05-15 12:02                     ` Asynchronous scsi scanning Matthew Wilcox
2007-05-15 16:30                       ` Simon Arlott
2007-05-15 17:29                         ` Matthew Wilcox
2007-05-15 21:56                           ` [PATCH] SCSI: Let users disable SCSI_WAIT_SCAN to be built Stefan Richter
2007-05-16 14:43                             ` Stefan Richter [this message]
2007-05-17 14:00                               ` James Bottomley
2007-05-17 17:02                                 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-15 23:27                           ` Asynchronous scsi scanning Satyam Sharma
2007-05-15 23:28                             ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-05-15 23:49                               ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-16  2:51                             ` Matthew Wilcox
2007-05-16  2:59                               ` Roland Dreier
2007-05-17 17:13                               ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-17 17:20                                 ` Matthew Wilcox
2007-05-17 17:41                                   ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-17 18:24                                     ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-05-17 18:47                                       ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-17 18:51                                         ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-05-17 19:04                                           ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-17 19:39                                             ` Matthew Wilcox
2007-05-17 19:43                                               ` Benjamin LaHaise
2007-05-17 21:30                                                 ` Matthew Wilcox
2007-05-17 21:42                                                   ` Dave Jones
2007-05-17 22:00                                                     ` Peter Jones
2007-05-18 14:00                                                       ` Stefan Richter
2007-05-18  5:28                                                   ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-18 11:24                                                     ` Matthew Wilcox
2007-05-18 13:14                                                       ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-18  3:41                                                 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-18 11:19                                                   ` Matthew Wilcox
2007-05-18 13:06                                                     ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-17 17:32                             ` sysfs makes scaling suck " Benjamin LaHaise
2007-05-17 17:45                               ` James Bottomley
2007-05-17 17:49                                 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2007-05-19 16:30                                   ` Greg KH
2007-05-17 22:24                       ` Peter Jones
2007-05-13 16:20     ` why does x86 "make defconfig" build a single, lonely module? Robert P. J. Day
2007-05-13 16:27       ` James Bottomley
2007-05-13 16:37         ` Robert P. J. Day
2007-05-13 17:42         ` Simon Arlott
2007-05-13 17:48           ` James Bottomley
2007-05-13 18:26             ` Simon Arlott
2007-05-13 18:45               ` Dave Jones
2007-05-13 18:45               ` James Bottomley
2007-05-14 17:29             ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-14 18:46               ` Alan Cox
2007-05-14 20:06                 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-13 16:28     ` Dave Jones
2007-05-13 20:38     ` Simon Arlott

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=464B1886.1060502@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
    --to=stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
    --cc=davej@redhat.com \
    --cc=james.bottomley@steeleye.com \
    --cc=kernel-packagers@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthew@wil.cx \
    --cc=simon@fire.lp0.eu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®