mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Frank van Maarseveen <frankvm@frankvm.com>,
	Hua Zhong <hzhong@gmail.com>,
	"'Linux Kernel Mailing List'" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: recent nfs change causes autofs regression
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 01:04:18 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1188536658.6626.98.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.0.999.0708302157470.25853@woody.linux-foundation.org>

On Thu, 2007-08-30 at 21:59 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 31 Aug 2007, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> > 
> > It did not. The previous behaviour was to always silently override the
> > user mount options.
> 
> ..so it still worked for any sane setup, at least.
> 
> You broke that. Hua gave good reasons for why he cannot use the current 
> kernel. It's a regression.
> 
> In other words, the new behaviour is *worse* than the behaviour you 
> consider to be the incorrect one.

So you are saying that it is acceptable for the kernel to decide
unilaterally to override mount options? Why aren't we doing that for any
other filesystem than NFS?

Trond


  reply	other threads:[~2007-08-31  5:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-08-30 21:07 Hua Zhong
2007-08-30 22:37 ` Trond Myklebust
2007-08-30 22:47   ` Hua Zhong
2007-08-30 23:22     ` Trond Myklebust
2007-08-30 23:30       ` Hua Zhong
2007-08-30 23:37         ` Trond Myklebust
2007-08-30 23:44           ` Hua Zhong
2007-08-31  4:31             ` Trond Myklebust
2007-08-31  4:38               ` Linus Torvalds
2007-08-31  4:47                 ` Hua Zhong
2007-08-31  4:57                 ` Trond Myklebust
2007-08-31  5:09               ` Ian Kent
2007-08-31  7:50               ` Matthias Schniedermeyer
2007-08-31  1:24   ` Andrew Morton
2007-08-31  4:33     ` Trond Myklebust
2007-08-31  3:49   ` Linus Torvalds
2007-08-31  3:57     ` Hua Zhong
2007-08-31  4:44     ` Trond Myklebust
2007-08-31  4:59       ` Linus Torvalds
2007-08-31  5:04         ` Trond Myklebust [this message]
2007-08-31  5:16           ` Linus Torvalds
2007-08-31  7:40             ` Jakob Oestergaard
2007-08-31  8:07               ` Linus Torvalds
2007-08-31  8:51                 ` Jakob Oestergaard
2007-08-31 16:43                   ` Linus Torvalds
2007-09-03 13:20                     ` Jakob Oestergaard
2007-09-03 13:43                       ` Martin Knoblauch
2007-08-31 12:11                 ` Trond Myklebust
2007-08-31 13:12                   ` Frank van Maarseveen
2007-08-31 13:50                     ` Trond Myklebust
2007-08-31 14:42                       ` Frank van Maarseveen
2007-09-04  7:51                 ` David Howells
2007-08-31  8:28               ` Frank van Maarseveen
2007-08-31  5:24           ` Hua Zhong
2007-08-31  5:38         ` Ian Kent
2007-08-31  8:54           ` Martin Knoblauch
2007-08-31 16:21     ` Trond Myklebust
2007-08-31 17:01       ` Linus Torvalds
2007-08-31 19:03         ` Trond Myklebust
2007-08-31 18:47       ` Hua Zhong
2007-08-31 19:13         ` Trond Myklebust
2007-08-31 19:35           ` Hua Zhong
2007-08-31 19:41           ` Hua Zhong
2007-09-02  0:58       ` Bill Davidsen
2007-09-04  7:54       ` David Howells
2007-09-05 12:35         ` Bill Davidsen
2007-09-05 12:44         ` Ian Kent
2007-09-05 16:26           ` Trond Myklebust
2007-09-05 15:34         ` David Howells
2007-09-05 15:37         ` David Howells
2007-09-05 15:50           ` Trond Myklebust
2007-09-06  5:23             ` Ian Kent
2007-09-04  8:02       ` David Howells
2007-09-04  8:35       ` David Howells
2007-09-04  9:04         ` Linus Torvalds
2007-08-31  8:14 ` Frank van Maarseveen
2007-08-31  9:05   ` Ian Kent

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1188536658.6626.98.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org \
    --to=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=frankvm@frankvm.com \
    --cc=hzhong@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®