mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@suse.cz>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: Re: Spinlocks: Factor our GENERIC_LOCKBREAK in order to avoid spin with irqs disable
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 19:19:21 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1214241561.19392.21.camel@elijah.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0805071148240.8441@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>

On Wed, 2008-05-07 at 11:49 -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> Subject: Spinlocks: Factor our GENERIC_LOCKBREAK in order to avoid spin with irqs disabled
> 
> The nice spinlock functions that enable interrupts while spinning are only
> usable if GENERIC_LOCKBREAK is set (and we do not debug locks but lock
> debugging would not be used for a production configuration).
> 
> Factor out the dependencies on the ->lock_break field from the nice functions
> into a set of BREAKLOCK macros (cannot be functions since the type of the lock
> variable varies).
> 
> The nice spinlock function can then also be used if !GENERIC_LOCKBREAK
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
> 
> ---
>  kernel/spinlock.c |   40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: linux-2.6/kernel/spinlock.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/spinlock.c	2008-05-07 11:19:31.000000000 -0700
> +++ linux-2.6/kernel/spinlock.c	2008-05-07 11:40:56.000000000 -0700
> @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(_write_trylock);
>   * even on CONFIG_PREEMPT, because lockdep assumes that interrupts are
>   * not re-enabled during lock-acquire (which the preempt-spin-ops do):
>   */
> -#if !defined(CONFIG_GENERIC_LOCKBREAK) || defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC)
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC

Maybe I'm just blind, but doesn't this change effectively disable any
arch-specific optimized code for _raw_*_lock?

If CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC is set, then CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK must also
be set, so in that case the debugging versions of _raw_*_lock are used.
But if CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC is _not_ set, then the locks are built
with _trylock and _can_lock primitives.

What am I missing here?

Petr Tesarik



  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-06-23 17:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-05-06 19:26 Spinlocks waiting with interrupts disabled / preempt disabled Christoph Lameter
2008-05-07  7:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-05-07 17:04   ` Christoph Lameter
2008-05-07 17:24     ` Christoph Lameter
2008-05-07 18:49       ` Spinlocks: Factor our GENERIC_LOCKBREAK in order to avoid spin with irqs disable Christoph Lameter
2008-05-09 10:26         ` Ingo Molnar
2008-05-09 16:28           ` Christoph Lameter
2008-06-23 17:19         ` Petr Tesarik [this message]
2008-06-23 17:54           ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-23 18:20           ` Christoph Lameter
2008-06-23 20:39             ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-23 20:45               ` Christoph Lameter
2008-06-23 20:58                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-26  2:51                   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-06-26  6:51                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-26 15:49                       ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-06-26  9:17                     ` Petr Tesarik
2008-06-26 17:02                       ` Christoph Lameter
2008-06-26 17:48                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-07 11:50                     ` Nick Piggin
2008-07-07 11:52                       ` Nick Piggin
2008-07-07 15:56                         ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-07-08  2:08                           ` Nick Piggin
2008-07-07 15:53                       ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-07-07 19:46                     ` Rik van Riel
2008-07-07 20:14                       ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-07-08  2:07                         ` Nick Piggin
2008-07-08  5:57                           ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-07-08  8:41                             ` Nick Piggin
2008-07-08 15:58                               ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-09 16:35   ` Spinlocks waiting with interrupts disabled / preempt disabled Olaf Weber
2008-05-09 17:56     ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-05-09 18:00       ` Christoph Lameter
2008-05-09 18:06         ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-05-09 20:01       ` Olaf Weber

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1214241561.19392.21.camel@elijah.suse.cz \
    --to=ptesarik@suse.cz \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=clameter@sgi.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®