From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Olaf Weber <olaf@sgi.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, npiggin@suse.de
Subject: Re: Spinlocks waiting with interrupts disabled / preempt disabled.
Date: Fri, 9 May 2008 11:00:22 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0805091059050.19252@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1210355814.13978.255.camel@twins>
On Fri, 9 May 2008, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > A third solution would be to look at this problem on a case-by-case
> > basis. In the case under discussion, there may be other kernel bugs
> > that aggravate the problem (it is an old kernel after all) and maybe
> > this just means the address_space.tree_lock ought to be replaced with
> > something else (though I wouldn't claim to know what).
>
> That has been done by Nick Piggin, the lockless pagecache work removes
> the read side of the tree_lock.
When is that going to get merged? find_get_page is still:
struct page * find_get_page(struct address_space *mapping, pgoff_t offset)
{
struct page *page;
read_lock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock);
page = radix_tree_lookup(&mapping->page_tree, offset);
if (page)
page_cache_get(page);
read_unlock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock);
return page;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(find_get_page);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-09 18:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-06 19:26 Christoph Lameter
2008-05-07 7:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-05-07 17:04 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-05-07 17:24 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-05-07 18:49 ` Spinlocks: Factor our GENERIC_LOCKBREAK in order to avoid spin with irqs disable Christoph Lameter
2008-05-09 10:26 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-05-09 16:28 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-06-23 17:19 ` Petr Tesarik
2008-06-23 17:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-23 18:20 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-06-23 20:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-23 20:45 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-06-23 20:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-26 2:51 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-06-26 6:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-26 15:49 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-06-26 9:17 ` Petr Tesarik
2008-06-26 17:02 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-06-26 17:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-07 11:50 ` Nick Piggin
2008-07-07 11:52 ` Nick Piggin
2008-07-07 15:56 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-07-08 2:08 ` Nick Piggin
2008-07-07 15:53 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-07-07 19:46 ` Rik van Riel
2008-07-07 20:14 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-07-08 2:07 ` Nick Piggin
2008-07-08 5:57 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-07-08 8:41 ` Nick Piggin
2008-07-08 15:58 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-09 16:35 ` Spinlocks waiting with interrupts disabled / preempt disabled Olaf Weber
2008-05-09 17:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-05-09 18:00 ` Christoph Lameter [this message]
2008-05-09 18:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-05-09 20:01 ` Olaf Weber
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0805091059050.19252@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com \
--to=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=olaf@sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®