From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: axboe@kernel.dk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 01/14] block: merge blk_invoke_request_fn() into __blk_run_queue()
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 14:02:45 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1236920578-2179-2-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1236920578-2179-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
Impact: merge two subtly different internal functions
__blk_run_queue wraps blk_invoke_request_fn() such that it
additionally removes plug and bails out early if the queue is empty.
Both extra operations have their own pending mechanisms and don't
cause any harm correctness-wise when they are done superflously.
The only user of blk_invoke_request_fn() being blk_start_queue(),
there isn't much reason to keep both functions around. Merge
blk_invoke_request_fn() into __blk_run_queue() and make
blk_start_queue() use __blk_run_queue() instead.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
---
block/blk-core.c | 35 ++++++++++++++---------------------
1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
index 7b63c9b..95dc76f 100644
--- a/block/blk-core.c
+++ b/block/blk-core.c
@@ -333,24 +333,6 @@ void blk_unplug(struct request_queue *q)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_unplug);
-static void blk_invoke_request_fn(struct request_queue *q)
-{
- if (unlikely(blk_queue_stopped(q)))
- return;
-
- /*
- * one level of recursion is ok and is much faster than kicking
- * the unplug handling
- */
- if (!queue_flag_test_and_set(QUEUE_FLAG_REENTER, q)) {
- q->request_fn(q);
- queue_flag_clear(QUEUE_FLAG_REENTER, q);
- } else {
- queue_flag_set(QUEUE_FLAG_PLUGGED, q);
- kblockd_schedule_work(q, &q->unplug_work);
- }
-}
-
/**
* blk_start_queue - restart a previously stopped queue
* @q: The &struct request_queue in question
@@ -365,7 +347,7 @@ void blk_start_queue(struct request_queue *q)
WARN_ON(!irqs_disabled());
queue_flag_clear(QUEUE_FLAG_STOPPED, q);
- blk_invoke_request_fn(q);
+ __blk_run_queue(q);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_start_queue);
@@ -425,12 +407,23 @@ void __blk_run_queue(struct request_queue *q)
{
blk_remove_plug(q);
+ if (unlikely(blk_queue_stopped(q)))
+ return;
+
+ if (elv_queue_empty(q))
+ return;
+
/*
* Only recurse once to avoid overrunning the stack, let the unplug
* handling reinvoke the handler shortly if we already got there.
*/
- if (!elv_queue_empty(q))
- blk_invoke_request_fn(q);
+ if (!queue_flag_test_and_set(QUEUE_FLAG_REENTER, q)) {
+ q->request_fn(q);
+ queue_flag_clear(QUEUE_FLAG_REENTER, q);
+ } else {
+ queue_flag_set(QUEUE_FLAG_PLUGGED, q);
+ kblockd_schedule_work(q, &q->unplug_work);
+ }
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__blk_run_queue);
--
1.6.0.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-13 5:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-13 5:02 [GIT PATCH] block: cleanup patches Tejun Heo
2009-03-13 5:02 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2009-03-13 5:02 ` [PATCH 02/14] block: kill blk_start_queueing() Tejun Heo
2009-03-13 5:02 ` [PATCH 03/14] block: don't set REQ_NOMERGE unnecessarily Tejun Heo
2009-03-13 5:02 ` [PATCH 04/14] block: cleanup REQ_SOFTBARRIER usages Tejun Heo
2009-03-13 5:02 ` [PATCH 05/14] block: clean up misc stuff after block layer timeout conversion Tejun Heo
2009-03-13 5:02 ` [PATCH 06/14] block: reorder request completion functions Tejun Heo
2009-03-13 5:02 ` [PATCH 07/14] block: reorganize request fetching functions Tejun Heo
2009-03-13 5:02 ` [PATCH 08/14] block: kill blk_end_request_callback() Tejun Heo
2009-03-13 5:02 ` [PATCH 09/14] block: clean up request completion API Tejun Heo
2009-03-16 9:12 ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-03-16 9:45 ` Tejun Heo
2009-03-13 5:02 ` [PATCH 10/14] block: move rq->start_time initialization to blk_rq_init() Tejun Heo
2009-03-13 5:02 ` [PATCH 11/14] block: implement and use [__]blk_end_request_all() Tejun Heo
2009-03-13 19:21 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-03-14 1:56 ` Tejun Heo
2009-03-14 2:10 ` Tejun Heo
2009-03-14 19:23 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-03-14 19:56 ` James Bottomley
2009-03-14 20:19 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-03-15 16:48 ` Jens Axboe
2009-03-15 17:40 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-03-15 18:39 ` Jens Axboe
2009-03-15 20:34 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-03-15 20:48 ` Jens Axboe
2009-03-15 21:34 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-03-16 1:39 ` Tejun Heo
2009-03-13 5:02 ` [PATCH 12/14] block: kill end_request() Tejun Heo
2009-03-13 5:02 ` [PATCH 13/14] ubd: simplify block request completion Tejun Heo
2009-03-13 5:02 ` [PATCH 14/14] block: clean up unnecessary stuff from block drivers Tejun Heo
2009-03-14 2:00 ` [GIT PATCH] block: cleanup patches Tejun Heo
2009-03-15 16:45 ` Jens Axboe
2009-03-16 1:15 ` Tejun Heo
2009-03-16 7:22 ` Jens Axboe
2009-03-16 7:53 ` Tejun Heo
2009-03-16 7:57 ` Jens Axboe
2009-04-21 16:37 [GIT PATCH linux-2.6-block] block: cleanup patches, take#3 Tejun Heo
2009-04-21 16:37 ` [PATCH 01/14] block: merge blk_invoke_request_fn() into __blk_run_queue() Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1236920578-2179-2-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome