mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com>
Subject: [PATCH 09/12] kvm/svm: consolidate nested_svm_exit_handled
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 14:56:29 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1248872192-30881-10-git-send-email-joerg.roedel@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1248872192-30881-1-git-send-email-joerg.roedel@amd.com>

When caching guest intercepts there is no need anymore for the
nested_svm_exit_handled_real function. So move its code into
nested_svm_exit_handled.

Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/svm.c |  108 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------
 1 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
index 9192c9a..263dfa4 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
@@ -1463,15 +1463,57 @@ static int nested_svm_do(struct vcpu_svm *svm,
 	return retval;
 }
 
-static int nested_svm_exit_handled_real(struct vcpu_svm *svm,
-					void *arg1,
-					void *arg2,
-					void *opaque)
+static int nested_svm_exit_handled_msr(struct vcpu_svm *svm,
+				       void *arg1, void *arg2,
+				       void *opaque)
+{
+	struct vmcb *nested_vmcb = (struct vmcb *)arg1;
+	u8 *msrpm = (u8 *)arg2;
+        u32 t0, t1;
+	u32 msr = svm->vcpu.arch.regs[VCPU_REGS_RCX];
+	u32 param = svm->vmcb->control.exit_info_1 & 1;
+
+	if (!(nested_vmcb->control.intercept & (1ULL << INTERCEPT_MSR_PROT)))
+		return 0;
+
+	switch(msr) {
+	case 0 ... 0x1fff:
+		t0 = (msr * 2) % 8;
+		t1 = msr / 8;
+		break;
+	case 0xc0000000 ... 0xc0001fff:
+		t0 = (8192 + msr - 0xc0000000) * 2;
+		t1 = (t0 / 8);
+		t0 %= 8;
+		break;
+	case 0xc0010000 ... 0xc0011fff:
+		t0 = (16384 + msr - 0xc0010000) * 2;
+		t1 = (t0 / 8);
+		t0 %= 8;
+		break;
+	default:
+		return 1;
+		break;
+	}
+	if (msrpm[t1] & ((1 << param) << t0))
+		return 1;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int nested_svm_exit_handled(struct vcpu_svm *svm, bool kvm_override)
 {
-	bool kvm_overrides = *(bool *)opaque;
 	u32 exit_code = svm->vmcb->control.exit_code;
 
-	if (kvm_overrides) {
+	switch (svm->vmcb->control.exit_code) {
+	case SVM_EXIT_MSR:
+		return nested_svm_do(svm, svm->nested.vmcb,
+				     svm->nested.vmcb_msrpm, NULL,
+				     nested_svm_exit_handled_msr);
+	default: break;
+	}
+
+	if (kvm_override) {
 		switch (exit_code) {
 		case SVM_EXIT_INTR:
 		case SVM_EXIT_NMI:
@@ -1533,60 +1575,6 @@ static int nested_svm_exit_handled_real(struct vcpu_svm *svm,
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static int nested_svm_exit_handled_msr(struct vcpu_svm *svm,
-				       void *arg1, void *arg2,
-				       void *opaque)
-{
-	struct vmcb *nested_vmcb = (struct vmcb *)arg1;
-	u8 *msrpm = (u8 *)arg2;
-        u32 t0, t1;
-	u32 msr = svm->vcpu.arch.regs[VCPU_REGS_RCX];
-	u32 param = svm->vmcb->control.exit_info_1 & 1;
-
-	if (!(nested_vmcb->control.intercept & (1ULL << INTERCEPT_MSR_PROT)))
-		return 0;
-
-	switch(msr) {
-	case 0 ... 0x1fff:
-		t0 = (msr * 2) % 8;
-		t1 = msr / 8;
-		break;
-	case 0xc0000000 ... 0xc0001fff:
-		t0 = (8192 + msr - 0xc0000000) * 2;
-		t1 = (t0 / 8);
-		t0 %= 8;
-		break;
-	case 0xc0010000 ... 0xc0011fff:
-		t0 = (16384 + msr - 0xc0010000) * 2;
-		t1 = (t0 / 8);
-		t0 %= 8;
-		break;
-	default:
-		return 1;
-		break;
-	}
-	if (msrpm[t1] & ((1 << param) << t0))
-		return 1;
-
-	return 0;
-}
-
-static int nested_svm_exit_handled(struct vcpu_svm *svm, bool kvm_override)
-{
-	bool k = kvm_override;
-
-	switch (svm->vmcb->control.exit_code) {
-	case SVM_EXIT_MSR:
-		return nested_svm_do(svm, svm->nested.vmcb,
-				     svm->nested.vmcb_msrpm, NULL,
-				     nested_svm_exit_handled_msr);
-	default: break;
-	}
-
-	return nested_svm_do(svm, svm->nested.vmcb, 0, &k,
-			     nested_svm_exit_handled_real);
-}
-
 static inline void copy_vmcb_control_area(struct vmcb *dst_vmcb, struct vmcb *from_vmcb)
 {
 	struct vmcb_control_area *dst  = &dst_vmcb->control;
-- 
1.6.3.3



  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-07-29 12:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-07-29 12:56 [PATCH 0/12] Nested SVM cleanups Joerg Roedel
2009-07-29 12:56 ` [PATCH 01/12] kvm/svm: make nested svm debugging runtime configurable Joerg Roedel
2009-07-29 13:22   ` Alexander Graf
2009-07-29 12:56 ` [PATCH 02/12] kvm/svm: add helper functions for global interrupt flag Joerg Roedel
2009-07-29 13:15   ` Alexander Graf
2009-07-29 13:44     ` Joerg Roedel
2009-07-29 12:56 ` [PATCH 03/12] kvm/svm: optimize nested #vmexit Joerg Roedel
2009-07-29 13:23   ` Alexander Graf
2009-07-29 12:56 ` [PATCH 04/12] kvm/svm: optimize nested vmrun Joerg Roedel
2009-07-29 13:27   ` Alexander Graf
2009-07-29 12:56 ` [PATCH 05/12] kvm/svm: copy only necessary parts of the control area on vmrun/vmexit Joerg Roedel
2009-07-29 13:30   ` Alexander Graf
2009-07-29 13:47     ` Joerg Roedel
2009-07-29 13:48       ` Alexander Graf
2009-07-29 12:56 ` [PATCH 06/12] kvm/svm: complete interrupts after handling nested exits Joerg Roedel
2009-07-29 13:46   ` Alexander Graf
2009-07-29 12:56 ` [PATCH 07/12] kvm/svm: move nested svm state into seperate struct Joerg Roedel
2009-07-29 13:49   ` Alexander Graf
2009-07-29 12:56 ` [PATCH 08/12] kvm/svm: cache nested intercepts Joerg Roedel
2009-07-29 13:13   ` Avi Kivity
2009-07-29 13:13     ` Joerg Roedel
2009-07-29 13:26       ` Avi Kivity
2009-07-29 13:47         ` Joerg Roedel
2009-07-29 13:50   ` Alexander Graf
2009-07-29 13:52     ` Joerg Roedel
2009-07-29 12:56 ` Joerg Roedel [this message]
2009-07-29 13:56   ` [PATCH 09/12] kvm/svm: consolidate nested_svm_exit_handled Alexander Graf
2009-07-29 12:56 ` [PATCH 10/12] kvm/svm: do nested vmexit in nested_svm_exit_handled Joerg Roedel
2009-07-29 14:15   ` Alexander Graf
2009-07-29 12:56 ` [PATCH 11/12] kvm/svm: handle #pf intercepts in nested_svm_exit_handled directly Joerg Roedel
2009-07-29 14:20   ` Alexander Graf
2009-07-29 14:44     ` Avi Kivity
2009-07-29 14:41       ` Alexander Graf
2009-07-29 14:49         ` Avi Kivity
2009-07-29 14:46           ` Alexander Graf
2009-07-29 12:56 ` [PATCH 12/12] kvm/svm: simplify nested_svm_check_exception Joerg Roedel
2009-07-29 14:21   ` Alexander Graf
2009-07-29 13:05 ` [PATCH 0/12] Nested SVM cleanups Avi Kivity
2009-07-29 13:09   ` Joerg Roedel
2009-07-29 13:31     ` Avi Kivity
2009-07-29 13:32     ` Avi Kivity
2009-07-29 13:29       ` Alexander Graf
2009-07-29 13:38       ` Joerg Roedel
2009-07-29 13:48         ` Avi Kivity
2009-07-29 13:48           ` Joerg Roedel
2009-07-29 13:59             ` Avi Kivity
2009-07-29 13:58               ` Joerg Roedel
2009-07-29 14:07                 ` Avi Kivity
2009-07-29 13:06 ` Avi Kivity

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1248872192-30881-10-git-send-email-joerg.roedel@amd.com \
    --to=joerg.roedel@amd.com \
    --cc=agraf@suse.de \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®