From: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com>
Subject: [PATCH 07/12] kvm/svm: move nested svm state into seperate struct
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 14:56:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1248872192-30881-8-git-send-email-joerg.roedel@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1248872192-30881-1-git-send-email-joerg.roedel@amd.com>
This makes it more clear for which purpose these members in the vcpu_svm
exist.
Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/svm.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
1 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
index 1756a4c..31467b1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
@@ -76,6 +76,18 @@ static const u32 host_save_user_msrs[] = {
struct kvm_vcpu;
+struct nested_state {
+ struct vmcb *hsave;
+ u64 hsave_msr;
+ u64 vmcb;
+
+ /* These are the merged vectors */
+ u32 *msrpm;
+
+ /* gpa pointers to the real vectors */
+ u64 vmcb_msrpm;
+};
+
struct vcpu_svm {
struct kvm_vcpu vcpu;
struct vmcb *vmcb;
@@ -92,16 +104,8 @@ struct vcpu_svm {
u64 host_gs_base;
u32 *msrpm;
- struct vmcb *hsave;
- u64 hsave_msr;
-
- u64 nested_vmcb;
- /* These are the merged vectors */
- u32 *nested_msrpm;
-
- /* gpa pointers to the real vectors */
- u64 nested_vmcb_msrpm;
+ struct nested_state nested;
};
/* enable NPT for AMD64 and X86 with PAE */
@@ -134,7 +138,7 @@ static inline struct vcpu_svm *to_svm(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
static inline bool is_nested(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
{
- return svm->nested_vmcb;
+ return svm->nested.vmcb;
}
static inline void enable_gif(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
@@ -645,7 +649,7 @@ static void init_vmcb(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
}
force_new_asid(&svm->vcpu);
- svm->nested_vmcb = 0;
+ svm->nested.vmcb = 0;
enable_gif(svm);
}
@@ -706,9 +710,9 @@ static struct kvm_vcpu *svm_create_vcpu(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned int id)
hsave_page = alloc_page(GFP_KERNEL);
if (!hsave_page)
goto uninit;
- svm->hsave = page_address(hsave_page);
+ svm->nested.hsave = page_address(hsave_page);
- svm->nested_msrpm = page_address(nested_msrpm_pages);
+ svm->nested.msrpm = page_address(nested_msrpm_pages);
svm->vmcb = page_address(page);
clear_page(svm->vmcb);
@@ -738,8 +742,8 @@ static void svm_free_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
__free_page(pfn_to_page(svm->vmcb_pa >> PAGE_SHIFT));
__free_pages(virt_to_page(svm->msrpm), MSRPM_ALLOC_ORDER);
- __free_page(virt_to_page(svm->hsave));
- __free_pages(virt_to_page(svm->nested_msrpm), MSRPM_ALLOC_ORDER);
+ __free_page(virt_to_page(svm->nested.hsave));
+ __free_pages(virt_to_page(svm->nested.msrpm), MSRPM_ALLOC_ORDER);
kvm_vcpu_uninit(vcpu);
kmem_cache_free(kvm_vcpu_cache, svm);
}
@@ -1565,13 +1569,13 @@ static int nested_svm_exit_handled(struct vcpu_svm *svm, bool kvm_override)
switch (svm->vmcb->control.exit_code) {
case SVM_EXIT_MSR:
- return nested_svm_do(svm, svm->nested_vmcb,
- svm->nested_vmcb_msrpm, NULL,
+ return nested_svm_do(svm, svm->nested.vmcb,
+ svm->nested.vmcb_msrpm, NULL,
nested_svm_exit_handled_msr);
default: break;
}
- return nested_svm_do(svm, svm->nested_vmcb, 0, &k,
+ return nested_svm_do(svm, svm->nested.vmcb, 0, &k,
nested_svm_exit_handled_real);
}
@@ -1611,7 +1615,7 @@ static int nested_svm_vmexit_real(struct vcpu_svm *svm, void *arg1,
void *arg2, void *opaque)
{
struct vmcb *nested_vmcb = (struct vmcb *)arg1;
- struct vmcb *hsave = svm->hsave;
+ struct vmcb *hsave = svm->nested.hsave;
struct vmcb *vmcb = svm->vmcb;
/* Give the current vmcb to the guest */
@@ -1686,7 +1690,7 @@ static int nested_svm_vmexit_real(struct vcpu_svm *svm, void *arg1,
svm->vmcb->control.exit_int_info = 0;
/* Exit nested SVM mode */
- svm->nested_vmcb = 0;
+ svm->nested.vmcb = 0;
return 0;
}
@@ -1694,7 +1698,7 @@ static int nested_svm_vmexit_real(struct vcpu_svm *svm, void *arg1,
static int nested_svm_vmexit(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
{
nsvm_printk("VMexit\n");
- if (nested_svm_do(svm, svm->nested_vmcb, 0,
+ if (nested_svm_do(svm, svm->nested.vmcb, 0,
NULL, nested_svm_vmexit_real))
return 1;
@@ -1710,8 +1714,8 @@ static int nested_svm_vmrun_msrpm(struct vcpu_svm *svm, void *arg1,
int i;
u32 *nested_msrpm = (u32*)arg1;
for (i=0; i< PAGE_SIZE * (1 << MSRPM_ALLOC_ORDER) / 4; i++)
- svm->nested_msrpm[i] = svm->msrpm[i] | nested_msrpm[i];
- svm->vmcb->control.msrpm_base_pa = __pa(svm->nested_msrpm);
+ svm->nested.msrpm[i] = svm->msrpm[i] | nested_msrpm[i];
+ svm->vmcb->control.msrpm_base_pa = __pa(svm->nested.msrpm);
return 0;
}
@@ -1720,11 +1724,11 @@ static int nested_svm_vmrun(struct vcpu_svm *svm, void *arg1,
void *arg2, void *opaque)
{
struct vmcb *nested_vmcb = (struct vmcb *)arg1;
- struct vmcb *hsave = svm->hsave;
+ struct vmcb *hsave = svm->nested.hsave;
struct vmcb *vmcb = svm->vmcb;
/* nested_vmcb is our indicator if nested SVM is activated */
- svm->nested_vmcb = svm->vmcb->save.rax;
+ svm->nested.vmcb = svm->vmcb->save.rax;
/* Clear internal status */
kvm_clear_exception_queue(&svm->vcpu);
@@ -1802,7 +1806,7 @@ static int nested_svm_vmrun(struct vcpu_svm *svm, void *arg1,
svm->vmcb->control.intercept |= nested_vmcb->control.intercept;
- svm->nested_vmcb_msrpm = nested_vmcb->control.msrpm_base_pa;
+ svm->nested.vmcb_msrpm = nested_vmcb->control.msrpm_base_pa;
force_new_asid(&svm->vcpu);
svm->vmcb->control.exit_int_info = nested_vmcb->control.exit_int_info;
@@ -1904,7 +1908,7 @@ static int vmrun_interception(struct vcpu_svm *svm, struct kvm_run *kvm_run)
NULL, nested_svm_vmrun))
return 1;
- if (nested_svm_do(svm, svm->nested_vmcb_msrpm, 0,
+ if (nested_svm_do(svm, svm->nested.vmcb_msrpm, 0,
NULL, nested_svm_vmrun_msrpm))
return 1;
@@ -2114,7 +2118,7 @@ static int svm_get_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned ecx, u64 *data)
*data = svm->vmcb->save.last_excp_to;
break;
case MSR_VM_HSAVE_PA:
- *data = svm->hsave_msr;
+ *data = svm->nested.hsave_msr;
break;
case MSR_VM_CR:
*data = 0;
@@ -2200,7 +2204,7 @@ static int svm_set_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned ecx, u64 data)
svm_disable_lbrv(svm);
break;
case MSR_VM_HSAVE_PA:
- svm->hsave_msr = data;
+ svm->nested.hsave_msr = data;
break;
case MSR_VM_CR:
case MSR_VM_IGNNE:
--
1.6.3.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-29 12:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-29 12:56 [PATCH 0/12] Nested SVM cleanups Joerg Roedel
2009-07-29 12:56 ` [PATCH 01/12] kvm/svm: make nested svm debugging runtime configurable Joerg Roedel
2009-07-29 13:22 ` Alexander Graf
2009-07-29 12:56 ` [PATCH 02/12] kvm/svm: add helper functions for global interrupt flag Joerg Roedel
2009-07-29 13:15 ` Alexander Graf
2009-07-29 13:44 ` Joerg Roedel
2009-07-29 12:56 ` [PATCH 03/12] kvm/svm: optimize nested #vmexit Joerg Roedel
2009-07-29 13:23 ` Alexander Graf
2009-07-29 12:56 ` [PATCH 04/12] kvm/svm: optimize nested vmrun Joerg Roedel
2009-07-29 13:27 ` Alexander Graf
2009-07-29 12:56 ` [PATCH 05/12] kvm/svm: copy only necessary parts of the control area on vmrun/vmexit Joerg Roedel
2009-07-29 13:30 ` Alexander Graf
2009-07-29 13:47 ` Joerg Roedel
2009-07-29 13:48 ` Alexander Graf
2009-07-29 12:56 ` [PATCH 06/12] kvm/svm: complete interrupts after handling nested exits Joerg Roedel
2009-07-29 13:46 ` Alexander Graf
2009-07-29 12:56 ` Joerg Roedel [this message]
2009-07-29 13:49 ` [PATCH 07/12] kvm/svm: move nested svm state into seperate struct Alexander Graf
2009-07-29 12:56 ` [PATCH 08/12] kvm/svm: cache nested intercepts Joerg Roedel
2009-07-29 13:13 ` Avi Kivity
2009-07-29 13:13 ` Joerg Roedel
2009-07-29 13:26 ` Avi Kivity
2009-07-29 13:47 ` Joerg Roedel
2009-07-29 13:50 ` Alexander Graf
2009-07-29 13:52 ` Joerg Roedel
2009-07-29 12:56 ` [PATCH 09/12] kvm/svm: consolidate nested_svm_exit_handled Joerg Roedel
2009-07-29 13:56 ` Alexander Graf
2009-07-29 12:56 ` [PATCH 10/12] kvm/svm: do nested vmexit in nested_svm_exit_handled Joerg Roedel
2009-07-29 14:15 ` Alexander Graf
2009-07-29 12:56 ` [PATCH 11/12] kvm/svm: handle #pf intercepts in nested_svm_exit_handled directly Joerg Roedel
2009-07-29 14:20 ` Alexander Graf
2009-07-29 14:44 ` Avi Kivity
2009-07-29 14:41 ` Alexander Graf
2009-07-29 14:49 ` Avi Kivity
2009-07-29 14:46 ` Alexander Graf
2009-07-29 12:56 ` [PATCH 12/12] kvm/svm: simplify nested_svm_check_exception Joerg Roedel
2009-07-29 14:21 ` Alexander Graf
2009-07-29 13:05 ` [PATCH 0/12] Nested SVM cleanups Avi Kivity
2009-07-29 13:09 ` Joerg Roedel
2009-07-29 13:31 ` Avi Kivity
2009-07-29 13:32 ` Avi Kivity
2009-07-29 13:29 ` Alexander Graf
2009-07-29 13:38 ` Joerg Roedel
2009-07-29 13:48 ` Avi Kivity
2009-07-29 13:48 ` Joerg Roedel
2009-07-29 13:59 ` Avi Kivity
2009-07-29 13:58 ` Joerg Roedel
2009-07-29 14:07 ` Avi Kivity
2009-07-29 13:06 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1248872192-30881-8-git-send-email-joerg.roedel@amd.com \
--to=joerg.roedel@amd.com \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®