mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: WARNING: kmemcheck: Caught 32-bit read from uninitialized memory (f6f6e1a4), by kmemleak's scan_block()
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 11:45:14 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1251189914.7261.11.camel@penberg-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090825083222.GC17692@elte.hu>

On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 10:32 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > In any case, I don't think it is very productive to run them both 
> > at the same time, simply because kmemcheck slows every memory 
> > access down so much and scanning memory doesn't exactly help that. 
> > It _could_ be useful to have them compiled into the same kernel, 
> > though, e.g. a distro "-debug" kernel.
> > 
> > Maybe you can just add the "depends on !KMEMLEAK" to 
> > CONFIG_KMEMCHECK in tip/out-of-tree for now?
> 
> i think it would be far more intelligent to annotate those accesses 
> by kmemleak as 'trust me, dont check'. Willing to test such a patch.

I guess something like this totally untested patch should do it. Vegard,
Catalin?

			Pekka

diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/kmemcheck/kmemcheck.c b/arch/x86/mm/kmemcheck/kmemcheck.c
index 2c55ed0..528bf95 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/kmemcheck/kmemcheck.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/kmemcheck/kmemcheck.c
@@ -331,6 +331,20 @@ static void kmemcheck_read_strict(struct pt_regs *regs,
 	kmemcheck_shadow_set(shadow, size);
 }
 
+bool kmemcheck_is_obj_initialized(unsigned long addr, size_t size)
+{
+	enum kmemcheck_shadow status;
+	void *shadow;
+
+	shadow = kmemcheck_shadow_lookup(addr);
+	if (!shadow)
+		return true;
+
+	status = kmemcheck_shadow_test(shadow, size);
+
+	return status == KMEMCHECK_SHADOW_INITIALIZED;
+}
+
 /* Access may cross page boundary */
 static void kmemcheck_read(struct pt_regs *regs,
 	unsigned long addr, unsigned int size)
diff --git a/include/linux/kmemcheck.h b/include/linux/kmemcheck.h
index 47b39b7..dc2fd54 100644
--- a/include/linux/kmemcheck.h
+++ b/include/linux/kmemcheck.h
@@ -34,6 +34,8 @@ void kmemcheck_mark_initialized_pages(struct page *p, unsigned int n);
 int kmemcheck_show_addr(unsigned long address);
 int kmemcheck_hide_addr(unsigned long address);
 
+bool kmemcheck_is_obj_initialized(unsigned long addr, size_t size);
+
 #else
 #define kmemcheck_enabled 0
 
@@ -99,6 +101,11 @@ static inline void kmemcheck_mark_initialized_pages(struct page *p,
 {
 }
 
+static inline bool kmemcheck_is_obj_initialized(unsigned long addr, size_t size)
+{
+	return true;
+}
+
 #endif /* CONFIG_KMEMCHECK */
 
 /*
diff --git a/mm/kmemleak.c b/mm/kmemleak.c
index 4872673..c14d6e4 100644
--- a/mm/kmemleak.c
+++ b/mm/kmemleak.c
@@ -97,6 +97,7 @@
 #include <asm/processor.h>
 #include <asm/atomic.h>
 
+#include <linux/kmemcheck.h>
 #include <linux/kmemleak.h>
 
 /*
@@ -949,6 +950,8 @@ static void scan_object(struct kmemleak_object *object)
 	if (!(object->flags & OBJECT_ALLOCATED))
 		/* already freed object */
 		goto out;
+	if (!kmemcheck_is_obj_initialized(object->pointer, object->size))
+		goto out;
 	if (hlist_empty(&object->area_list))
 		scan_block((void *)object->pointer,
 			   (void *)(object->pointer + object->size), object, 0);



  reply	other threads:[~2009-08-25  8:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-08-25  7:19 Ingo Molnar
2009-08-25  8:04 ` Vegard Nossum
2009-08-25  8:08   ` Pekka Enberg
2009-08-25  8:27     ` Catalin Marinas
2009-08-25  8:31       ` Pekka Enberg
2009-08-25  8:40         ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-25  8:48           ` Pekka Enberg
2009-08-25  8:32   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-25  8:45     ` Pekka Enberg [this message]
2009-08-25  8:48       ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-25  8:54         ` Pekka Enberg
2009-08-25  9:03           ` Vegard Nossum
2009-08-25  9:11             ` Catalin Marinas
2009-08-25  9:15               ` Pekka Enberg
2009-08-25  9:25                 ` Catalin Marinas
2009-08-25  9:11             ` Pekka Enberg
2009-08-25  9:21               ` Catalin Marinas
2009-08-25  9:26                 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-08-25  9:28                   ` Catalin Marinas
2009-08-25  9:31                     ` Pekka Enberg
2009-08-25  9:34                       ` Catalin Marinas
2009-08-25  9:34                       ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-25 10:43                         ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-25 13:57                           ` Catalin Marinas
2009-08-26 10:48                         ` Pekka Enberg
2009-08-26 11:17                           ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-25  9:25               ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1251189914.7261.11.camel@penberg-laptop \
    --to=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=vegard.nossum@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®