From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
To: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: WARNING: kmemcheck: Caught 32-bit read from uninitialized memory (f6f6e1a4), by kmemleak's scan_block()
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 12:11:47 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1251191507.26351.0.camel@penberg-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <19f34abd0908250203h52257f52v306545a3d8890577@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 11:03 +0200, Vegard Nossum wrote:
> I don't know so much about the kmemleak internals, but this I can say
> about the kmemcheck part: According to your definition, an object is
> initialized if all the bytes of an object are initialized.
>
> Is it possible that because of this, if we have a partially
> uninitialized object, kmemleak will not record the pointers found in
> that object? If so, it might skip valid pointers, and deem an object
> unreferenced. Which could make kmemleak give false-positives.
>
> I think it would be better to ask kmemcheck on a per-pointer basis
> (i.e. for each pointer-sized word in the object), whether it is
> initialized or not.
Yeah, makes sense.
Pekka
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/kmemcheck/kmemcheck.c b/arch/x86/mm/kmemcheck/kmemcheck.c
index 2c55ed0..528bf95 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/kmemcheck/kmemcheck.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/kmemcheck/kmemcheck.c
@@ -331,6 +331,20 @@ static void kmemcheck_read_strict(struct pt_regs *regs,
kmemcheck_shadow_set(shadow, size);
}
+bool kmemcheck_is_obj_initialized(unsigned long addr, size_t size)
+{
+ enum kmemcheck_shadow status;
+ void *shadow;
+
+ shadow = kmemcheck_shadow_lookup(addr);
+ if (!shadow)
+ return true;
+
+ status = kmemcheck_shadow_test(shadow, size);
+
+ return status == KMEMCHECK_SHADOW_INITIALIZED;
+}
+
/* Access may cross page boundary */
static void kmemcheck_read(struct pt_regs *regs,
unsigned long addr, unsigned int size)
diff --git a/include/linux/kmemcheck.h b/include/linux/kmemcheck.h
index 47b39b7..dc2fd54 100644
--- a/include/linux/kmemcheck.h
+++ b/include/linux/kmemcheck.h
@@ -34,6 +34,8 @@ void kmemcheck_mark_initialized_pages(struct page *p, unsigned int n);
int kmemcheck_show_addr(unsigned long address);
int kmemcheck_hide_addr(unsigned long address);
+bool kmemcheck_is_obj_initialized(unsigned long addr, size_t size);
+
#else
#define kmemcheck_enabled 0
@@ -99,6 +101,11 @@ static inline void kmemcheck_mark_initialized_pages(struct page *p,
{
}
+static inline bool kmemcheck_is_obj_initialized(unsigned long addr, size_t size)
+{
+ return true;
+}
+
#endif /* CONFIG_KMEMCHECK */
/*
diff --git a/mm/kmemleak.c b/mm/kmemleak.c
index 6debe0d..b075bf0 100644
--- a/mm/kmemleak.c
+++ b/mm/kmemleak.c
@@ -97,6 +97,7 @@
#include <asm/processor.h>
#include <asm/atomic.h>
+#include <linux/kmemcheck.h>
#include <linux/kmemleak.h>
/*
@@ -885,7 +886,8 @@ static void scan_block(void *_start, void *_end,
for (ptr = start; ptr < end; ptr++) {
unsigned long flags;
- unsigned long pointer = *ptr;
+ unsigned long pointer;
+
struct kmemleak_object *object;
if (allow_resched)
@@ -893,6 +895,13 @@ static void scan_block(void *_start, void *_end,
if (scan_should_stop())
break;
+ /* Don't scan uninitialized memory. */
+ if (!kmemcheck_is_obj_initialized((unsigned long) ptr,
+ sizeof(unsigned long)))
+ continue;
+
+ pointer = *ptr;
+
object = find_and_get_object(pointer, 1);
if (!object)
continue;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-25 9:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-25 7:19 Ingo Molnar
2009-08-25 8:04 ` Vegard Nossum
2009-08-25 8:08 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-08-25 8:27 ` Catalin Marinas
2009-08-25 8:31 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-08-25 8:40 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-25 8:48 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-08-25 8:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-25 8:45 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-08-25 8:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-25 8:54 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-08-25 9:03 ` Vegard Nossum
2009-08-25 9:11 ` Catalin Marinas
2009-08-25 9:15 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-08-25 9:25 ` Catalin Marinas
2009-08-25 9:11 ` Pekka Enberg [this message]
2009-08-25 9:21 ` Catalin Marinas
2009-08-25 9:26 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-08-25 9:28 ` Catalin Marinas
2009-08-25 9:31 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-08-25 9:34 ` Catalin Marinas
2009-08-25 9:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-25 10:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-25 13:57 ` Catalin Marinas
2009-08-26 10:48 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-08-26 11:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-25 9:25 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1251191507.26351.0.camel@penberg-laptop \
--to=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=vegard.nossum@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®