mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: WARNING: kmemcheck: Caught 32-bit read from uninitialized memory  (f6f6e1a4), by kmemleak's scan_block()
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 10:04:29 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <19f34abd0908250104y6e877545y485a2104c2b97cfd@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090825071959.GA25877@elte.hu>

2009/8/25 Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>:
>
> FYI, -tip testing triggered the following kmemcheck warning in
> kmemleak:
>
> PM: Adding info for No Bus:vcsa7
> WARNING: kmemcheck: Caught 32-bit read from uninitialized memory (f6f6e1a4)
> d873f9f600000000c42ae4c1005c87f70000000070665f666978656400000000
>  i i i i u u u u i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i u u u
>         ^
>
> Pid: 3091, comm: kmemleak Not tainted (2.6.31-rc7-tip #1303) P4DC6
> EIP: 0060:[<c110301f>] EFLAGS: 00010006 CPU: 0
> EIP is at scan_block+0x3f/0xe0
> EAX: f40bd700 EBX: f40bd780 ECX: f16b46c0 EDX: 00000001
> ESI: f6f6e1a4 EDI: 00000000 EBP: f10f3f4c ESP: c2605fcc
>  DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 00e0 SS: 0068
> CR0: 8005003b CR2: e89a4844 CR3: 30ff1000 CR4: 000006f0
> DR0: 00000000 DR1: 00000000 DR2: 00000000 DR3: 00000000
> DR6: ffff4ff0 DR7: 00000400
>  [<c110313c>] scan_object+0x7c/0xf0
>  [<c1103389>] kmemleak_scan+0x1d9/0x400
>  [<c1103a3c>] kmemleak_scan_thread+0x4c/0xb0
>  [<c10819d4>] kthread+0x74/0x80
>  [<c10257db>] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x3c
>  [<ffffffff>] 0xffffffff
> kmemleak: 515 new suspected memory leaks (see /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak)
> kmemleak: 42 new suspected memory leaks (see /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak)
>
> config attached. (And this is the first documented case of a kmem
> civil war i guess ;-)

Already the patch to make kmemcheck and kmemleak mutually exclusive is
underway. It is not surprising that kmemleak is scanning uninitialized
memory. But if you say that you have tried it before, it is strange
that it didn't appear until now.

In any case, I don't think it is very productive to run them both at
the same time, simply because kmemcheck slows every memory access down
so much and scanning memory doesn't exactly help that. It _could_ be
useful to have them compiled into the same kernel, though, e.g. a
distro "-debug" kernel.

Maybe you can just add the "depends on !KMEMLEAK" to CONFIG_KMEMCHECK
in tip/out-of-tree for now?


Vegard

  reply	other threads:[~2009-08-25  8:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-08-25  7:19 Ingo Molnar
2009-08-25  8:04 ` Vegard Nossum [this message]
2009-08-25  8:08   ` Pekka Enberg
2009-08-25  8:27     ` Catalin Marinas
2009-08-25  8:31       ` Pekka Enberg
2009-08-25  8:40         ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-25  8:48           ` Pekka Enberg
2009-08-25  8:32   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-25  8:45     ` Pekka Enberg
2009-08-25  8:48       ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-25  8:54         ` Pekka Enberg
2009-08-25  9:03           ` Vegard Nossum
2009-08-25  9:11             ` Catalin Marinas
2009-08-25  9:15               ` Pekka Enberg
2009-08-25  9:25                 ` Catalin Marinas
2009-08-25  9:11             ` Pekka Enberg
2009-08-25  9:21               ` Catalin Marinas
2009-08-25  9:26                 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-08-25  9:28                   ` Catalin Marinas
2009-08-25  9:31                     ` Pekka Enberg
2009-08-25  9:34                       ` Catalin Marinas
2009-08-25  9:34                       ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-25 10:43                         ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-25 13:57                           ` Catalin Marinas
2009-08-26 10:48                         ` Pekka Enberg
2009-08-26 11:17                           ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-25  9:25               ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=19f34abd0908250104y6e877545y485a2104c2b97cfd@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=vegard.nossum@gmail.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®