From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, yinghai@kernel.org,
brgerst@gmail.com, gorcunov@gmail.com, shaohui.zheng@intel.com,
rientjes@google.com, mingo@elte.hu, hpa@linux.intel.com
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 12/26] x86-64, NUMA: Kill {acpi|amd}_get_nodes()
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 18:10:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1297530663-26234-13-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1297530663-26234-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
With common numa_nodes[], common code in numa_64.c can access it
directly. Copy directly and kill {acpi|amd}_get_nodes().
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
Cc: Shaohui Zheng <shaohui.zheng@intel.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h | 2 --
arch/x86/include/asm/amd_nb.h | 1 -
arch/x86/mm/amdtopology_64.c | 10 ----------
arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c | 23 ++++++++++-------------
arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c | 13 -------------
5 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h
index 06fb786..446a5b9 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h
@@ -185,8 +185,6 @@ struct bootnode;
#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA
extern int acpi_numa;
-extern void acpi_get_nodes(struct bootnode *physnodes, unsigned long start,
- unsigned long end);
extern int x86_acpi_numa_init(void);
extern int acpi_scan_nodes(void);
#define NR_NODE_MEMBLKS (MAX_NUMNODES*2)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/amd_nb.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/amd_nb.h
index 72abf65..765966f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/amd_nb.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/amd_nb.h
@@ -21,7 +21,6 @@ extern int amd_scan_nodes(void);
#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_EMU
extern void amd_fake_nodes(const struct bootnode *nodes, int nr_nodes);
-extern void amd_get_nodes(struct bootnode *nodes);
#endif
struct amd_northbridge {
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/amdtopology_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/amdtopology_64.c
index 06698b1..fe93e23 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/amdtopology_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/amdtopology_64.c
@@ -204,16 +204,6 @@ static s16 fake_apicid_to_node[MAX_LOCAL_APIC] __initdata = {
[0 ... MAX_LOCAL_APIC-1] = NUMA_NO_NODE
};
-void __init amd_get_nodes(struct bootnode *physnodes)
-{
- int i;
-
- for_each_node_mask(i, mem_nodes_parsed) {
- physnodes[i].start = numa_nodes[i].start;
- physnodes[i].end = numa_nodes[i].end;
- }
-}
-
static int __init find_node_by_addr(unsigned long addr)
{
int ret = NUMA_NO_NODE;
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
index a0bceaa..2d3ee2f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
@@ -257,21 +257,18 @@ void __init numa_emu_cmdline(char *str)
cmdline = str;
}
-static int __init setup_physnodes(unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
- int acpi, int amd)
+static int __init setup_physnodes(unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
{
int ret = 0;
int i;
memset(physnodes, 0, sizeof(physnodes));
-#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA
- if (acpi)
- acpi_get_nodes(physnodes, start, end);
-#endif
-#ifdef CONFIG_AMD_NUMA
- if (amd)
- amd_get_nodes(physnodes);
-#endif
+
+ for_each_node_mask(i, mem_nodes_parsed) {
+ physnodes[i].start = numa_nodes[i].start;
+ physnodes[i].end = numa_nodes[i].end;
+ }
+
/*
* Basic sanity checking on the physical node map: there may be errors
* if the SRAT or AMD code incorrectly reported the topology or the mem=
@@ -593,7 +590,7 @@ static int __init numa_emulation(unsigned long start_pfn,
nodes[i].end >> PAGE_SHIFT);
setup_node_bootmem(i, nodes[i].start, nodes[i].end);
}
- setup_physnodes(addr, max_addr, acpi, amd);
+ setup_physnodes(addr, max_addr);
fake_physnodes(acpi, amd, num_nodes);
numa_init_array();
return 0;
@@ -664,10 +661,10 @@ void __init initmem_init(void)
cutoff_node(j, 0, max_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT);
#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_EMU
- setup_physnodes(0, max_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT, i == 0, i == 1);
+ setup_physnodes(0, max_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT);
if (cmdline && !numa_emulation(0, max_pfn, i == 0, i == 1))
return;
- setup_physnodes(0, max_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT, i == 0, i == 1);
+ setup_physnodes(0, max_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT);
nodes_clear(node_possible_map);
nodes_clear(node_online_map);
#endif
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c
index abb17d6..d84c983 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c
@@ -323,19 +323,6 @@ static int __init nodes_cover_memory(const struct bootnode *nodes)
void __init acpi_numa_arch_fixup(void) {}
-#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_EMU
-void __init acpi_get_nodes(struct bootnode *physnodes, unsigned long start,
- unsigned long end)
-{
- int i;
-
- for_each_node_mask(i, mem_nodes_parsed) {
- physnodes[i].start = numa_nodes[i].start;
- physnodes[i].end = numa_nodes[i].end;
- }
-}
-#endif /* CONFIG_NUMA_EMU */
-
int __init x86_acpi_numa_init(void)
{
int ret;
--
1.7.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-12 17:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 77+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-12 17:10 [PATCHSET x86/numa] x86-64, NUMA: bring sanity to NUMA configuration Tejun Heo
2011-02-12 17:10 ` [PATCH 01/26] x86-64, NUMA: Make dummy node initialization path similar to non-dummy ones Tejun Heo
2011-02-12 17:52 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-12 17:10 ` [PATCH 02/26] x86-64, NUMA: Simplify hotplug node handling in acpi_numa_memory_affinity_init() Tejun Heo
2011-02-12 17:47 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-12 17:56 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-12 18:04 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-12 18:06 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-12 18:13 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-14 11:25 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-14 16:12 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-12 17:10 ` [PATCH 03/26] x86-64, NUMA: Drop @start/last_pfn from initmem_init() Tejun Heo
2011-02-12 17:58 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-12 18:03 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-14 13:50 ` [PATCH UPDATED 03/26] x86, NUMA: Drop @start/last_pfn from initmem_init() initmem_init() Tejun Heo
2011-02-14 14:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-02-14 14:58 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-14 19:03 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-14 19:31 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-15 2:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-02-12 17:10 ` [PATCH 04/26] x86-64, NUMA: Unify {acpi|amd}_{numa_init|scan_nodes}() arguments and return values Tejun Heo
2011-02-12 18:39 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-14 11:29 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-14 16:14 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-14 16:18 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-14 18:00 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-12 17:10 ` [PATCH 05/26] x86-64, NUMA: Wrap acpi_numa_init() so that failure can be indicated by return value Tejun Heo
2011-02-12 17:10 ` [PATCH 06/26] x86-64, NUMA: Move *_numa_init() invocations into initmem_init() Tejun Heo
2011-02-14 6:10 ` Ankita Garg
2011-02-14 11:09 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-14 13:51 ` [PATCH UPDATED 06/26] x86, " Tejun Heo
2011-02-14 14:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-02-12 17:10 ` [PATCH 07/26] x86-64, NUMA: Restructure initmem_init() Tejun Heo
2011-02-12 17:10 ` [PATCH 08/26] x86-64, NUMA: Use common {cpu|mem}_nodes_parsed Tejun Heo
2011-02-12 17:10 ` [PATCH 09/26] x86-64, NUMA: Remove local variable found from amd_numa_init() Tejun Heo
2011-02-12 17:10 ` [PATCH 10/26] x86-64, NUMA: Move apicid to numa mapping initialization from amd_scan_nodes() to amd_numa_init() Tejun Heo
2011-02-14 22:59 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2011-02-15 9:36 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-15 17:31 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2011-02-15 17:54 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-15 18:01 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2011-02-15 18:27 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2011-02-15 19:41 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-12 17:10 ` [PATCH 11/26] x86-64, NUMA: Use common numa_nodes[] Tejun Heo
2011-02-12 17:10 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2011-02-12 17:10 ` [PATCH 13/26] x86-64, NUMA: Factor out memblk handling into numa_{add|register}_memblk() Tejun Heo
2011-02-12 17:10 ` [PATCH 14/26] x86-64, NUMA: Unify use of memblk in all init methods Tejun Heo
2011-02-12 17:10 ` [PATCH 15/26] x86-64, NUMA: Unify the rest of memblk registration Tejun Heo
2011-02-13 0:45 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-14 11:32 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-14 16:08 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-14 16:12 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-14 16:17 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-14 16:22 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-14 18:14 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-14 18:27 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-14 19:07 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-14 19:30 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-14 19:35 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-15 9:11 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-15 9:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-02-15 16:49 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 8:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-02-16 8:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-02-16 9:01 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 9:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-02-12 17:10 ` [PATCH 16/26] x86-64, NUMA: Kill {acpi|amd|dummy}_scan_nodes() Tejun Heo
2011-02-12 17:10 ` [PATCH 17/26] x86-64, NUMA: Remove %NULL @nodeids handling from compute_hash_shift() Tejun Heo
2011-02-12 17:10 ` [PATCH 18/26] x86-64, NUMA: Introduce struct numa_meminfo Tejun Heo
2011-02-12 17:10 ` [PATCH 19/26] x86-64, NUMA: Separate out numa_cleanup_meminfo() Tejun Heo
2011-02-12 17:10 ` [PATCH 20/26] x86-64, NUMA: make numa_cleanup_meminfo() prettier Tejun Heo
2011-02-12 17:10 ` [PATCH 21/26] x86-64, NUMA: consolidate and improve memblk sanity checks Tejun Heo
2011-02-12 17:10 ` [PATCH 22/26] x86-64, NUMA: Add common find_node_by_addr() Tejun Heo
2011-02-12 17:11 ` [PATCH 23/26] x86-64, NUMA: kill numa_nodes[] Tejun Heo
2011-02-12 17:11 ` [PATCH 24/26] x86-64, NUMA: Rename cpu_nodes_parsed to numa_nodes_parsed Tejun Heo
2011-02-12 17:11 ` [PATCH 25/26] x86-64, NUMA: Kill mem_nodes_parsed Tejun Heo
2011-02-12 17:11 ` [PATCH 26/26] x86-64, NUMA: Implement generic node distance handling Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1297530663-26234-13-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
--cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=shaohui.zheng@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome