From: Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@nebula.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, jwboyer@redhat.com,
keescook@chromium.org,
Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@nebula.com>
Subject: [PATCH 10/10] Add option to automatically enforce module signatures when in Secure Boot mode
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 12:10:19 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1376928619-3775-10-git-send-email-matthew.garrett@nebula.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1376928619-3775-1-git-send-email-matthew.garrett@nebula.com>
UEFI Secure Boot provides a mechanism for ensuring that the firmware will
only load signed bootloaders and kernels. Certain use cases may also
require that all kernel modules also be signed. Add a configuration option
that enforces this automatically when enabled.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@nebula.com>
---
Documentation/x86/zero-page.txt | 2 ++
arch/x86/Kconfig | 10 ++++++++++
arch/x86/boot/compressed/eboot.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/bootparam.h | 3 ++-
arch/x86/kernel/setup.c | 6 ++++++
include/linux/module.h | 6 ++++++
kernel/module.c | 7 +++++++
7 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/x86/zero-page.txt b/Documentation/x86/zero-page.txt
index 199f453..ec38acf 100644
--- a/Documentation/x86/zero-page.txt
+++ b/Documentation/x86/zero-page.txt
@@ -30,6 +30,8 @@ Offset Proto Name Meaning
1E9/001 ALL eddbuf_entries Number of entries in eddbuf (below)
1EA/001 ALL edd_mbr_sig_buf_entries Number of entries in edd_mbr_sig_buffer
(below)
+1EB/001 ALL kbd_status Numlock is enabled
+1EC/001 ALL secure_boot Secure boot is enabled in the firmware
1EF/001 ALL sentinel Used to detect broken bootloaders
290/040 ALL edd_mbr_sig_buffer EDD MBR signatures
2D0/A00 ALL e820_map E820 memory map table
diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
index b32ebf9..6a6c19b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
@@ -1581,6 +1581,16 @@ config EFI_STUB
See Documentation/x86/efi-stub.txt for more information.
+config EFI_SECURE_BOOT_SIG_ENFORCE
+ def_bool n
+ prompt "Force module signing when UEFI Secure Boot is enabled"
+ ---help---
+ UEFI Secure Boot provides a mechanism for ensuring that the
+ firmware will only load signed bootloaders and kernels. Certain
+ use cases may also require that all kernel modules also be signed.
+ Say Y here to automatically enable module signature enforcement
+ when a system boots with UEFI Secure Boot enabled.
+
config SECCOMP
def_bool y
prompt "Enable seccomp to safely compute untrusted bytecode"
diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/eboot.c b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/eboot.c
index b7388a4..145294d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/eboot.c
+++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/eboot.c
@@ -861,6 +861,37 @@ fail:
return status;
}
+static int get_secure_boot(efi_system_table_t *_table)
+{
+ u8 sb, setup;
+ unsigned long datasize = sizeof(sb);
+ efi_guid_t var_guid = EFI_GLOBAL_VARIABLE_GUID;
+ efi_status_t status;
+
+ status = efi_call_phys5(sys_table->runtime->get_variable,
+ L"SecureBoot", &var_guid, NULL, &datasize, &sb);
+
+ if (status != EFI_SUCCESS)
+ return 0;
+
+ if (sb == 0)
+ return 0;
+
+
+ status = efi_call_phys5(sys_table->runtime->get_variable,
+ L"SetupMode", &var_guid, NULL, &datasize,
+ &setup);
+
+ if (status != EFI_SUCCESS)
+ return 0;
+
+ if (setup == 1)
+ return 0;
+
+ return 1;
+}
+
+
/*
* Because the x86 boot code expects to be passed a boot_params we
* need to create one ourselves (usually the bootloader would create
@@ -1169,6 +1200,8 @@ struct boot_params *efi_main(void *handle, efi_system_table_t *_table,
if (sys_table->hdr.signature != EFI_SYSTEM_TABLE_SIGNATURE)
goto fail;
+ boot_params->secure_boot = get_secure_boot(sys_table);
+
setup_graphics(boot_params);
setup_efi_pci(boot_params);
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/bootparam.h b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/bootparam.h
index c15ddaf..d35da96 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/bootparam.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/bootparam.h
@@ -131,7 +131,8 @@ struct boot_params {
__u8 eddbuf_entries; /* 0x1e9 */
__u8 edd_mbr_sig_buf_entries; /* 0x1ea */
__u8 kbd_status; /* 0x1eb */
- __u8 _pad5[3]; /* 0x1ec */
+ __u8 secure_boot; /* 0x1ec */
+ __u8 _pad5[2]; /* 0x1ec */
/*
* The sentinel is set to a nonzero value (0xff) in header.S.
*
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
index f8ec578..deeb7bc 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
@@ -1129,6 +1129,12 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
io_delay_init();
+#ifdef CONFIG_EFI_SECURE_BOOT_SIG_ENFORCE
+ if (boot_params.secure_boot) {
+ enforce_signed_modules();
+ }
+#endif
+
/*
* Parse the ACPI tables for possible boot-time SMP configuration.
*/
diff --git a/include/linux/module.h b/include/linux/module.h
index 0c266b2..5a6374a 100644
--- a/include/linux/module.h
+++ b/include/linux/module.h
@@ -184,6 +184,12 @@ const struct exception_table_entry *search_exception_tables(unsigned long add);
struct notifier_block;
+#ifdef CONFIG_MODULE_SIG
+extern void enforce_signed_modules(void);
+#else
+static inline void enforce_signed_modules(void) {};
+#endif
+
#ifdef CONFIG_MODULES
extern int modules_disabled; /* for sysctl */
diff --git a/kernel/module.c b/kernel/module.c
index 801021e..0ec29c0 100644
--- a/kernel/module.c
+++ b/kernel/module.c
@@ -3853,6 +3853,13 @@ void module_layout(struct module *mod,
EXPORT_SYMBOL(module_layout);
#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_MODULE_SIG
+void enforce_signed_modules(void)
+{
+ sig_enforce = true;
+}
+#endif
+
bool secure_modules(void)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_MODULE_SIG
--
1.8.3.1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-19 16:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-19 16:10 [PATCH 01/10] Add secure_modules() call Matthew Garrett
2013-08-19 16:10 ` [PATCH 02/10] PCI: Lock down BAR access when module security is enabled Matthew Garrett
2013-08-19 16:10 ` [PATCH 03/10] x86: Lock down IO port " Matthew Garrett
2013-08-19 16:10 ` [PATCH 04/10] ACPI: Limit access to custom_method Matthew Garrett
2013-08-29 17:58 ` Lenny Szubowicz
2013-08-19 16:10 ` [PATCH 05/10] asus-wmi: Restrict debugfs interface when module loading is restricted Matthew Garrett
2013-08-19 16:20 ` Kees Cook
2013-08-19 17:15 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-08-29 18:22 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-08-29 18:35 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-08-29 18:46 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-08-29 18:49 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-08-29 19:05 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-08-29 19:07 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-08-29 19:28 ` Josh Boyer
2013-08-19 16:10 ` [PATCH 06/10] Restrict /dev/mem and /dev/kmem " Matthew Garrett
2013-08-19 16:10 ` [PATCH 07/10] acpi: Ignore acpi_rsdp kernel parameter " Matthew Garrett
2013-08-19 16:10 ` [PATCH 08/10] kexec: Disable at runtime if the kernel enforces module loading restrictions Matthew Garrett
2013-09-01 8:52 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-08-19 16:10 ` [PATCH 09/10] x86: Restrict MSR access when module loading is restricted Matthew Garrett
2013-08-19 16:10 ` Matthew Garrett [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1376928619-3775-10-git-send-email-matthew.garrett@nebula.com \
--to=matthew.garrett@nebula.com \
--cc=jwboyer@redhat.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®