From: Peter Samuelson <peter@cadcamlab.org>
To: Vladislav Malyshkin <mal@gromco.com>
Cc: R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl, torvalds@transmeta.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: test10-pre7
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 10:45:41 -0600 (CST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <14846.63285.212616.574188@wire.cadcamlab.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <39FEF039.69FAFDB2@gromco.com>
[Vladislav Malyshkin <mal@gromco.com>]
> You can easily remove duplicates in object files without sorting.
> You can just use a shell written function.
This is true. That was something I forgot to mention. I have looked
at that as well, and it strikes me as even more of a hack than the
solutions I mentioned: it is yet another external shell process for
each invocation of Rules.make (ie each directory). As I said before,
though, one man's hack is another man's clean design, so whatever.
Your function is rather long; try this one instead (untested):
remove_duplicates () {
str='';
for i; do
case "$str " in *" $i "*) ;; *) str="$str $i" ;; esac
done
echo "$str"
}
I still think anything outside the makefiles that's needed to organize
the build process is a hack. That includes scripts/pathdown.sh (yes, I
do have a scheme to get rid of it) and 2.2.18 scripts/kwhich (yes, I
did propose a working alternative). It doesn't include scripts/mkdep.c
(which must do a lot of work as efficiently as possible),
scripts/Configure et al (which are really standalone programs), or
scripts/split-include.c (which is really a continuation of Configure).
Peter
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-10-31 16:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-10-31 16:15 test10-pre7 Vladislav Malyshkin
2000-10-31 16:45 ` Peter Samuelson [this message]
2000-10-31 18:07 ` test10-pre7 Vladislav Malyshkin
2000-10-31 18:38 ` test10-pre7 Linus Torvalds
2000-10-31 19:16 ` test10-pre7 H. Peter Anvin
2000-11-01 3:15 ` test10-pre7 Peter Samuelson
2000-11-01 6:11 ` test10-pre7 H. Peter Anvin
2000-11-01 6:19 ` Linus's poll variation Lyle Coder
2000-11-01 6:31 ` test10-pre7 Peter Samuelson
2000-11-01 7:42 ` test10-pre7 Peter Samuelson
2000-11-03 16:26 ` test10-pre7 Vladislav Malyshkin
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2000-10-31 0:52 test10-pre7 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2000-10-31 1:05 ` test10-pre7 Christoph Hellwig
2000-10-30 19:32 test10-pre7 Linus Torvalds
2000-10-30 21:37 ` test10-pre7 Keith Owens
2000-10-30 22:01 ` test10-pre7 Jeff Garzik
2000-10-30 22:06 ` test10-pre7 Keith Owens
2000-10-30 22:13 ` test10-pre7 Jeff Garzik
2000-10-30 22:24 ` test10-pre7 Linus Torvalds
2000-10-30 22:41 ` test10-pre7 Keith Owens
2000-10-30 22:51 ` test10-pre7 Linus Torvalds
2000-10-30 23:02 ` test10-pre7 Jeff Garzik
2000-10-30 23:04 ` test10-pre7 Keith Owens
2000-10-30 23:08 ` test10-pre7 Linus Torvalds
2000-10-30 23:03 ` test10-pre7 Keith Owens
2000-10-30 23:15 ` test10-pre7 Linus Torvalds
2000-10-30 23:32 ` test10-pre7 Christoph Hellwig
2000-10-30 23:40 ` test10-pre7 Linus Torvalds
2000-10-30 23:45 ` test10-pre7 Christoph Hellwig
2000-10-30 23:51 ` test10-pre7 Linus Torvalds
2000-10-30 23:57 ` test10-pre7 Christoph Hellwig
2000-10-31 0:47 ` test10-pre7 Linus Torvalds
2000-10-31 1:01 ` test10-pre7 Christoph Hellwig
2000-10-31 2:54 ` test10-pre7 Linus Torvalds
2000-10-31 1:49 ` test10-pre7 Keith Owens
2000-10-31 2:07 ` test10-pre7 Keith Owens
2000-10-31 2:58 ` test10-pre7 Linus Torvalds
2000-10-31 13:55 ` test10-pre7 Peter Samuelson
2000-10-31 17:29 ` test10-pre7 Linus Torvalds
2000-10-31 17:38 ` test10-pre7 H. Peter Anvin
2000-10-31 19:51 ` test10-pre7 Horst von Brand
2000-11-01 2:32 ` test10-pre7 Peter Samuelson
2000-10-31 4:57 ` test10-pre7 Rusty Russell
2000-10-31 6:10 ` test10-pre7 Linus Torvalds
2000-10-30 23:38 ` test10-pre7 Keith Owens
2000-10-30 23:47 ` test10-pre7 Linus Torvalds
2000-10-31 0:03 ` test10-pre7 Keith Owens
2000-10-31 9:37 ` test10-pre7 Russell King
2000-10-31 14:02 ` test10-pre7 Keith Owens
2000-10-31 14:16 ` test10-pre7 Peter Samuelson
2000-10-31 17:31 ` test10-pre7 Linus Torvalds
2000-10-31 19:28 ` test10-pre7 Russell King
2000-10-31 20:59 ` test10-pre7 Linus Torvalds
2000-11-01 3:06 ` test10-pre7 Peter Samuelson
2000-11-01 2:35 ` test10-pre7 Keith Owens
2000-11-01 12:46 ` test10-pre7 Alan Cox
2000-10-31 11:59 ` test10-pre7 Peter Samuelson
2000-10-31 21:01 ` test10-pre7 John Alvord
2000-11-01 3:30 ` test10-pre7 Peter Samuelson
2000-10-31 8:18 ` test10-pre7 Rogier Wolff
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=14846.63285.212616.574188@wire.cadcamlab.org \
--to=peter@cadcamlab.org \
--cc=R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mal@gromco.com \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®