From: Peter Samuelson <peter@cadcamlab.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: test10-pre7
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 21:15:06 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20001031211506.E1041@wire.cadcamlab.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <39FF0A71.FE05FAEB@gromco.com> <Pine.LNX.4.10.10010311018180.7083-100000@penguin.transmeta.com> <8tn5q9$iu5$1@cesium.transmeta.com>
In-Reply-To: <8tn5q9$iu5$1@cesium.transmeta.com>; from hpa@zytor.com on Tue, Oct 31, 2000 at 11:16:25AM -0800
[hpa]
> I was going to ask to what extent we genuinely need sorting, and if
> we might be better off trying to eliminate that need as much as
> possible.
We don't need sorting. We need removing of duplicates. The GNU make
sort function removes duplicates as a side effect, which is why we want
to use it.
As has been discussed, there are lots of ways to remove duplicates.
You can spawn a shell script, you can keep track of each "common" file
with a tristate make variable, you can play with deeply nested if
statements, and rumor has it you may be able to write a custom GNU make
function (though I have doubts, as I have tried this before and
couldn't get anything to work).
To Keith, Michael and me, the cleanest way to remove duplicates is
$(sort). Since some object files must *not* be sorted, we came up with
a simple, readable way to declare that certain things had to come in a
certain order -- the idea being that most of the time it would not be
needed. Linus disagrees that our solution is simple, readable or
otherwise desirable. That's basically the whole issue in a nutshell.
Peter
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-11-01 3:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-10-31 16:15 test10-pre7 Vladislav Malyshkin
2000-10-31 16:45 ` test10-pre7 Peter Samuelson
2000-10-31 18:07 ` test10-pre7 Vladislav Malyshkin
2000-10-31 18:38 ` test10-pre7 Linus Torvalds
2000-10-31 19:16 ` test10-pre7 H. Peter Anvin
2000-11-01 3:15 ` Peter Samuelson [this message]
2000-11-01 6:11 ` test10-pre7 H. Peter Anvin
2000-11-01 6:19 ` Linus's poll variation Lyle Coder
2000-11-01 6:31 ` test10-pre7 Peter Samuelson
2000-11-01 7:42 ` test10-pre7 Peter Samuelson
2000-11-03 16:26 ` test10-pre7 Vladislav Malyshkin
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2000-10-31 0:52 test10-pre7 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2000-10-31 1:05 ` test10-pre7 Christoph Hellwig
2000-10-30 19:32 test10-pre7 Linus Torvalds
2000-10-30 21:37 ` test10-pre7 Keith Owens
2000-10-30 22:01 ` test10-pre7 Jeff Garzik
2000-10-30 22:06 ` test10-pre7 Keith Owens
2000-10-30 22:13 ` test10-pre7 Jeff Garzik
2000-10-30 22:24 ` test10-pre7 Linus Torvalds
2000-10-30 22:41 ` test10-pre7 Keith Owens
2000-10-30 22:51 ` test10-pre7 Linus Torvalds
2000-10-30 23:02 ` test10-pre7 Jeff Garzik
2000-10-30 23:04 ` test10-pre7 Keith Owens
2000-10-30 23:08 ` test10-pre7 Linus Torvalds
2000-10-30 23:03 ` test10-pre7 Keith Owens
2000-10-30 23:15 ` test10-pre7 Linus Torvalds
2000-10-30 23:32 ` test10-pre7 Christoph Hellwig
2000-10-30 23:40 ` test10-pre7 Linus Torvalds
2000-10-30 23:45 ` test10-pre7 Christoph Hellwig
2000-10-30 23:51 ` test10-pre7 Linus Torvalds
2000-10-30 23:57 ` test10-pre7 Christoph Hellwig
2000-10-31 0:47 ` test10-pre7 Linus Torvalds
2000-10-31 1:01 ` test10-pre7 Christoph Hellwig
2000-10-31 2:54 ` test10-pre7 Linus Torvalds
2000-10-31 1:49 ` test10-pre7 Keith Owens
2000-10-31 2:07 ` test10-pre7 Keith Owens
2000-10-31 2:58 ` test10-pre7 Linus Torvalds
2000-10-31 13:55 ` test10-pre7 Peter Samuelson
2000-10-31 17:29 ` test10-pre7 Linus Torvalds
2000-10-31 17:38 ` test10-pre7 H. Peter Anvin
2000-10-31 19:51 ` test10-pre7 Horst von Brand
2000-11-01 2:32 ` test10-pre7 Peter Samuelson
2000-10-31 4:57 ` test10-pre7 Rusty Russell
2000-10-31 6:10 ` test10-pre7 Linus Torvalds
2000-10-30 23:38 ` test10-pre7 Keith Owens
2000-10-30 23:47 ` test10-pre7 Linus Torvalds
2000-10-31 0:03 ` test10-pre7 Keith Owens
2000-10-31 9:37 ` test10-pre7 Russell King
2000-10-31 14:02 ` test10-pre7 Keith Owens
2000-10-31 14:16 ` test10-pre7 Peter Samuelson
2000-10-31 17:31 ` test10-pre7 Linus Torvalds
2000-10-31 19:28 ` test10-pre7 Russell King
2000-10-31 20:59 ` test10-pre7 Linus Torvalds
2000-11-01 3:06 ` test10-pre7 Peter Samuelson
2000-11-01 2:35 ` test10-pre7 Keith Owens
2000-11-01 12:46 ` test10-pre7 Alan Cox
2000-10-31 11:59 ` test10-pre7 Peter Samuelson
2000-10-31 21:01 ` test10-pre7 John Alvord
2000-11-01 3:30 ` test10-pre7 Peter Samuelson
2000-10-31 8:18 ` test10-pre7 Rogier Wolff
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20001031211506.E1041@wire.cadcamlab.org \
--to=peter@cadcamlab.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®