* [GIT PULL] ARM: CPUFreq updates for 3.11
@ 2013-06-24 5:50 Viresh Kumar
2013-06-24 10:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2013-06-24 5:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: cpufreq, Linux Kernel Mailing List, linux-arm-kernel, linux-pm,
Lists linaro-kernel
Hi Rafael,
This is part of my patchset "CPUFreq: Fix {PRE|POST}CHANGE notification
sequence". It contains changes specific to cpufreq core and ARM drivers.
I have left changes to non-ARM cpufreq drivers from this pull request. See if
you can take them for 3.11.
The following changes since commit 9e895ace5d82df8929b16f58e9f515f6d54ab82d:
Linux 3.10-rc7 (2013-06-22 09:47:31 -1000)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.linaro.org/people/vireshk/linux.git cpufreq-fix-notification-arm
for you to fetch changes up to f2d65dd0d573e6961165f0be35bac84997b9e707:
cpufreq: tegra: call CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE notfier in error cases
(2013-06-24 11:14:24 +0530)
----------------------------------------------------------------
Viresh Kumar (9):
cpufreq: make sure frequency transitions are serialized
cpufreq: arm-big-little: call CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE notfier in error cases
cpufreq: davinci: call CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE notfier in error cases
cpufreq: dbx500: call CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE notfier in error cases
cpufreq: exynos: call CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE notfier in error cases
cpufreq: imx6q: call CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE notfier in error cases
cpufreq: omap: call CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE notfier in error cases
cpufreq: s3c64xx: call CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE notfier in error cases
cpufreq: tegra: call CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE notfier in error cases
drivers/cpufreq/arm_big_little.c | 4 +---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 9 +++++++++
drivers/cpufreq/davinci-cpufreq.c | 3 +++
drivers/cpufreq/dbx500-cpufreq.c | 4 ++--
drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c | 10 ++++++++--
drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c | 17 +++++++++++------
drivers/cpufreq/omap-cpufreq.c | 6 +++---
drivers/cpufreq/s3c64xx-cpufreq.c | 8 ++++++--
drivers/cpufreq/tegra-cpufreq.c | 4 ++--
9 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [GIT PULL] ARM: CPUFreq updates for 3.11
2013-06-24 5:50 [GIT PULL] ARM: CPUFreq updates for 3.11 Viresh Kumar
@ 2013-06-24 10:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-24 10:42 ` Viresh Kumar
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2013-06-24 10:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Viresh Kumar
Cc: cpufreq, Linux Kernel Mailing List, linux-arm-kernel, linux-pm,
Lists linaro-kernel
On Monday, June 24, 2013 11:20:35 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
>
> This is part of my patchset "CPUFreq: Fix {PRE|POST}CHANGE notification
> sequence". It contains changes specific to cpufreq core and ARM drivers.
>
> I have left changes to non-ARM cpufreq drivers from this pull request. See if
> you can take them for 3.11.
>
> The following changes since commit 9e895ace5d82df8929b16f58e9f515f6d54ab82d:
>
> Linux 3.10-rc7 (2013-06-22 09:47:31 -1000)
>
> are available in the git repository at:
>
> git://git.linaro.org/people/vireshk/linux.git cpufreq-fix-notification-arm
>
> for you to fetch changes up to f2d65dd0d573e6961165f0be35bac84997b9e707:
Well, this contains changes that aren't specific to ARM as far as I can say.
Not pulled.
Thanks,
Rafael
> cpufreq: tegra: call CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE notfier in error cases
> (2013-06-24 11:14:24 +0530)
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Viresh Kumar (9):
> cpufreq: make sure frequency transitions are serialized
> cpufreq: arm-big-little: call CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE notfier in error cases
> cpufreq: davinci: call CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE notfier in error cases
> cpufreq: dbx500: call CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE notfier in error cases
> cpufreq: exynos: call CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE notfier in error cases
> cpufreq: imx6q: call CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE notfier in error cases
> cpufreq: omap: call CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE notfier in error cases
> cpufreq: s3c64xx: call CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE notfier in error cases
> cpufreq: tegra: call CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE notfier in error cases
>
> drivers/cpufreq/arm_big_little.c | 4 +---
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 9 +++++++++
> drivers/cpufreq/davinci-cpufreq.c | 3 +++
> drivers/cpufreq/dbx500-cpufreq.c | 4 ++--
> drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c | 10 ++++++++--
> drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c | 17 +++++++++++------
> drivers/cpufreq/omap-cpufreq.c | 6 +++---
> drivers/cpufreq/s3c64xx-cpufreq.c | 8 ++++++--
> drivers/cpufreq/tegra-cpufreq.c | 4 ++--
> 9 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [GIT PULL] ARM: CPUFreq updates for 3.11
2013-06-24 10:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2013-06-24 10:42 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-06-24 10:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2013-06-24 10:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: cpufreq, Linux Kernel Mailing List, linux-arm-kernel, linux-pm,
Lists linaro-kernel
On 24 June 2013 16:19, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> On Monday, June 24, 2013 11:20:35 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> Hi Rafael,
>>
>> This is part of my patchset "CPUFreq: Fix {PRE|POST}CHANGE notification
>> sequence". It contains changes specific to cpufreq core and ARM drivers.
>>
>> I have left changes to non-ARM cpufreq drivers from this pull request. See if
>> you can take them for 3.11.
>>
>> The following changes since commit 9e895ace5d82df8929b16f58e9f515f6d54ab82d:
>>
>> Linux 3.10-rc7 (2013-06-22 09:47:31 -1000)
>>
>> are available in the git repository at:
>>
>> git://git.linaro.org/people/vireshk/linux.git cpufreq-fix-notification-arm
>>
>> for you to fetch changes up to f2d65dd0d573e6961165f0be35bac84997b9e707:
>
> Well, this contains changes that aren't specific to ARM as far as I can say.
Yeah, the first patch touches core. How do you want to proceed with this one
then? You will apply them from mail? Or you will apply first patch (core cpufreq
one) and I should send pull request without it?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [GIT PULL] ARM: CPUFreq updates for 3.11
2013-06-24 10:42 ` Viresh Kumar
@ 2013-06-24 10:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-24 11:10 ` Viresh Kumar
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2013-06-24 10:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Viresh Kumar
Cc: cpufreq, Linux Kernel Mailing List, linux-arm-kernel, linux-pm,
Lists linaro-kernel
On Monday, June 24, 2013 04:12:29 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 24 June 2013 16:19, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> > On Monday, June 24, 2013 11:20:35 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> >> Hi Rafael,
> >>
> >> This is part of my patchset "CPUFreq: Fix {PRE|POST}CHANGE notification
> >> sequence". It contains changes specific to cpufreq core and ARM drivers.
> >>
> >> I have left changes to non-ARM cpufreq drivers from this pull request. See if
> >> you can take them for 3.11.
> >>
> >> The following changes since commit 9e895ace5d82df8929b16f58e9f515f6d54ab82d:
> >>
> >> Linux 3.10-rc7 (2013-06-22 09:47:31 -1000)
> >>
> >> are available in the git repository at:
> >>
> >> git://git.linaro.org/people/vireshk/linux.git cpufreq-fix-notification-arm
> >>
> >> for you to fetch changes up to f2d65dd0d573e6961165f0be35bac84997b9e707:
> >
> > Well, this contains changes that aren't specific to ARM as far as I can say.
>
> Yeah, the first patch touches core. How do you want to proceed with this one
> then? You will apply them from mail? Or you will apply first patch (core cpufreq
> one) and I should send pull request without it?
In your original series that patch was the last one. What made you change your
mind and put it in front?
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [GIT PULL] ARM: CPUFreq updates for 3.11
2013-06-24 10:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2013-06-24 11:10 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-06-24 11:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2013-06-24 11:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: cpufreq, Linux Kernel Mailing List, linux-arm-kernel, linux-pm,
Lists linaro-kernel
On 24 June 2013 16:29, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> In your original series that patch was the last one. What made you change your
> mind and put it in front?
I initially thought that this one would break git bisect (code would
compile, but would fail) for platforms whose code I have fixed in
this patchset.
But that is true only for failure cases, otherwise code would work as
normal.
And hence kept this at the top this time.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [GIT PULL] ARM: CPUFreq updates for 3.11
2013-06-24 11:10 ` Viresh Kumar
@ 2013-06-24 11:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-24 12:50 ` Viresh Kumar
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2013-06-24 11:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Viresh Kumar
Cc: cpufreq, Linux Kernel Mailing List, linux-arm-kernel, linux-pm,
Lists linaro-kernel
On Monday, June 24, 2013 04:40:27 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 24 June 2013 16:29, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
>
> > In your original series that patch was the last one. What made you change your
> > mind and put it in front?
>
> I initially thought that this one would break git bisect (code would
> compile, but would fail) for platforms whose code I have fixed in
> this patchset.
>
> But that is true only for failure cases, otherwise code would work as
> normal.
>
> And hence kept this at the top this time.
Well, it should go last. Also I'd prefer to apply it directly.
Please check my comment in there too.
Thanks,
Rafael
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [GIT PULL] ARM: CPUFreq updates for 3.11
2013-06-24 11:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2013-06-24 12:50 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-06-24 13:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2013-06-24 12:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: cpufreq, Linux Kernel Mailing List, linux-arm-kernel, linux-pm,
Lists linaro-kernel
On 24 June 2013 17:15, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> Well, it should go last. Also I'd prefer to apply it directly.
Okay.. Below is pull request for ARM patches alone.
The following changes since commit 9e895ace5d82df8929b16f58e9f515f6d54ab82d:
Linux 3.10-rc7 (2013-06-22 09:47:31 -1000)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.linaro.org/people/vireshk/linux.git cpufreq-fix-notification-arm
for you to fetch changes up to f56cc99e3f189ce214408e9c0fdda9e664d83dc1:
cpufreq: tegra: call CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE notfier in error cases
(2013-06-24 18:19:01 +0530)
----------------------------------------------------------------
Viresh Kumar (8):
cpufreq: arm-big-little: call CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE notfier in error cases
cpufreq: davinci: call CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE notfier in error cases
cpufreq: dbx500: call CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE notfier in error cases
cpufreq: exynos: call CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE notfier in error cases
cpufreq: imx6q: call CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE notfier in error cases
cpufreq: omap: call CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE notfier in error cases
cpufreq: s3c64xx: call CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE notfier in error cases
cpufreq: tegra: call CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE notfier in error cases
drivers/cpufreq/arm_big_little.c | 4 +---
drivers/cpufreq/davinci-cpufreq.c | 3 +++
drivers/cpufreq/dbx500-cpufreq.c | 4 ++--
drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c | 10 ++++++++--
drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c | 17 +++++++++++------
drivers/cpufreq/omap-cpufreq.c | 6 +++---
drivers/cpufreq/s3c64xx-cpufreq.c | 8 ++++++--
drivers/cpufreq/tegra-cpufreq.c | 4 ++--
8 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [GIT PULL] ARM: CPUFreq updates for 3.11
2013-06-24 12:50 ` Viresh Kumar
@ 2013-06-24 13:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2013-06-24 13:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Viresh Kumar
Cc: cpufreq, Linux Kernel Mailing List, linux-arm-kernel, linux-pm,
Lists linaro-kernel
On Monday, June 24, 2013 06:20:35 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 24 June 2013 17:15, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> > Well, it should go last. Also I'd prefer to apply it directly.
>
> Okay.. Below is pull request for ARM patches alone.
Pulled, thanks!
> The following changes since commit 9e895ace5d82df8929b16f58e9f515f6d54ab82d:
>
> Linux 3.10-rc7 (2013-06-22 09:47:31 -1000)
>
> are available in the git repository at:
>
> git://git.linaro.org/people/vireshk/linux.git cpufreq-fix-notification-arm
>
> for you to fetch changes up to f56cc99e3f189ce214408e9c0fdda9e664d83dc1:
>
> cpufreq: tegra: call CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE notfier in error cases
> (2013-06-24 18:19:01 +0530)
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Viresh Kumar (8):
> cpufreq: arm-big-little: call CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE notfier in error cases
> cpufreq: davinci: call CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE notfier in error cases
> cpufreq: dbx500: call CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE notfier in error cases
> cpufreq: exynos: call CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE notfier in error cases
> cpufreq: imx6q: call CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE notfier in error cases
> cpufreq: omap: call CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE notfier in error cases
> cpufreq: s3c64xx: call CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE notfier in error cases
> cpufreq: tegra: call CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE notfier in error cases
>
> drivers/cpufreq/arm_big_little.c | 4 +---
> drivers/cpufreq/davinci-cpufreq.c | 3 +++
> drivers/cpufreq/dbx500-cpufreq.c | 4 ++--
> drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c | 10 ++++++++--
> drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c | 17 +++++++++++------
> drivers/cpufreq/omap-cpufreq.c | 6 +++---
> drivers/cpufreq/s3c64xx-cpufreq.c | 8 ++++++--
> drivers/cpufreq/tegra-cpufreq.c | 4 ++--
> 8 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-06-24 13:13 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-06-24 5:50 [GIT PULL] ARM: CPUFreq updates for 3.11 Viresh Kumar
2013-06-24 10:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-24 10:42 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-06-24 10:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-24 11:10 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-06-24 11:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-24 12:50 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-06-24 13:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®