mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner" <tip-bot2@linutronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Crystal Wood <swood@redhat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [tip: locking/core] locking/rtmutex: Add a lockdep assert to catch potential nested blocking
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2023 07:36:09 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <169519536955.27769.443350425283875935.tip-bot2@tip-bot2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230908162254.999499-7-bigeasy@linutronix.de>

The following commit has been merged into the locking/core branch of tip:

Commit-ID:     45f67f30a22f264bc7a0a61255c2ee1a838e9403
Gitweb:        https://git.kernel.org/tip/45f67f30a22f264bc7a0a61255c2ee1a838e9403
Author:        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
AuthorDate:    Fri, 08 Sep 2023 18:22:53 +02:00
Committer:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
CommitterDate: Wed, 20 Sep 2023 09:31:14 +02:00

locking/rtmutex: Add a lockdep assert to catch potential nested blocking

There used to be a BUG_ON(current->pi_blocked_on) in the lock acquisition
functions, but that vanished in one of the rtmutex overhauls.

Bring it back in form of a lockdep assert to catch code paths which take
rtmutex based locks with current::pi_blocked_on != NULL.

Reported-by: Crystal Wood <swood@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230908162254.999499-7-bigeasy@linutronix.de
---
 kernel/locking/rtmutex.c     | 2 ++
 kernel/locking/rwbase_rt.c   | 2 ++
 kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c | 2 ++
 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
index a3fe05d..4a10e8c 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
@@ -1784,6 +1784,8 @@ static int __sched rt_mutex_slowlock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock,
 static __always_inline int __rt_mutex_lock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock,
 					   unsigned int state)
 {
+	lockdep_assert(!current->pi_blocked_on);
+
 	if (likely(rt_mutex_try_acquire(lock)))
 		return 0;
 
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rwbase_rt.c b/kernel/locking/rwbase_rt.c
index c7258cb..34a5956 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rwbase_rt.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rwbase_rt.c
@@ -133,6 +133,8 @@ static int __sched __rwbase_read_lock(struct rwbase_rt *rwb,
 static __always_inline int rwbase_read_lock(struct rwbase_rt *rwb,
 					    unsigned int state)
 {
+	lockdep_assert(!current->pi_blocked_on);
+
 	if (rwbase_read_trylock(rwb))
 		return 0;
 
diff --git a/kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c b/kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c
index 842037b..38e2924 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c
@@ -37,6 +37,8 @@
 
 static __always_inline void rtlock_lock(struct rt_mutex_base *rtm)
 {
+	lockdep_assert(!current->pi_blocked_on);
+
 	if (unlikely(!rt_mutex_cmpxchg_acquire(rtm, NULL, current)))
 		rtlock_slowlock(rtm);
 }

  reply	other threads:[~2023-09-20  7:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-08 16:22 [PATCH v3 0/7] locking/rtmutex: Avoid PI state recursion through sched_submit_work() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2023-09-08 16:22 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] sched: Constrain locks in sched_submit_work() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2023-09-20  7:36   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2023-09-08 16:22 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] locking/rtmutex: Avoid unconditional slowpath for DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2023-09-20  7:36   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2023-09-08 16:22 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] sched: Extract __schedule_loop() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2023-09-20  7:36   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-09-08 16:22 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] sched: Provide rt_mutex specific scheduler helpers Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2023-09-20  7:36   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2023-09-08 16:22 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] locking/rtmutex: Use " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2023-09-20  7:36   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2023-09-08 16:22 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] locking/rtmutex: Add a lockdep assert to catch potential nested blocking Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2023-09-20  7:36   ` tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2023-09-08 16:22 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] locking/rtmutex: Acquire the hb lock via trylock after wait-proxylock Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2023-09-09 18:29   ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-09-11 14:11   ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-09-12 10:57     ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-09-12 11:26       ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2023-09-12 11:17     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2023-09-12 11:24       ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-09-12 11:25       ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2023-09-12 11:25       ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-09-12 11:28         ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2023-09-15 12:58     ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-09-15 13:15       ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2023-09-15 15:19       ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-09-15 18:59         ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-09-19 11:03         ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2023-09-20  7:36         ` [tip: locking/core] futex/pi: Fix recursive rt_mutex waiter state tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2024-01-15 11:40         ` [PATCH v3 7/7] locking/rtmutex: Acquire the hb lock via trylock after wait-proxylock Jiri Slaby
2024-01-15 11:52           ` Jiri Slaby
2024-01-15 12:16             ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-01-15 12:54             ` Jiri Slaby
2024-01-15 15:32               ` Yann Ylavic
2024-01-15 18:33               ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-01-16  7:07                 ` Jiri Slaby

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=169519536955.27769.443350425283875935.tip-bot2@tip-bot2 \
    --to=tip-bot2@linutronix.de \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=swood@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®