From: "Moger, Babu" <bmoger@amd.com>
To: Maciej Wieczor-Retman <maciej.wieczor-retman@intel.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] Documentation/x86: Document resctrl's new sparse_masks
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2023 17:47:42 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <17079b9e-4efd-4258-2b5f-afc6d3ae2c0f@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <308c92438288a45a12330af83aa0088a31f60343.1695371055.git.maciej.wieczor-retman@intel.com>
Hi Maciej
On 9/22/2023 3:48 AM, Maciej Wieczor-Retman wrote:
> From: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
>
> The documentation mentions that non-contiguous bit masks are not
> supported in Intel Cache Allocation Technology (CAT).
>
> Update the documentation on how to determine if sparse bit masks are
> allowed in L2 and L3 CAT.
>
> Mention the file with feature support information is located in
> the /sys/fs/resctrl/info/{resource}/ directories and enumerate what
> are the possible outputs on file read operation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Maciej Wieczor-Retman <maciej.wieczor-retman@intel.com>
> ---
> Changelog v2:
> - Change bitmap naming convention to bit mask. (Reinette)
>
> Documentation/arch/x86/resctrl.rst | 16 ++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/arch/x86/resctrl.rst b/Documentation/arch/x86/resctrl.rst
> index cb05d90111b4..4c6421e2aa31 100644
> --- a/Documentation/arch/x86/resctrl.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/arch/x86/resctrl.rst
> @@ -124,6 +124,13 @@ related to allocation:
> "P":
> Corresponding region is pseudo-locked. No
> sharing allowed.
> +"sparse_masks":
> + Indicates if non-contiguous 1s value in CBM is supported.
> +
> + "0":
> + Only contiguous 1s value in CBM is supported.
This is little confusing. How about?
Non-contiguous 1s value in CBM is not supported
Thanks
Babu
> + "1":
> + Non-contiguous 1s value in CBM is supported.
>
> Memory bandwidth(MB) subdirectory contains the following files
> with respect to allocation:
> @@ -445,12 +452,13 @@ For cache resources we describe the portion of the cache that is available
> for allocation using a bitmask. The maximum value of the mask is defined
> by each cpu model (and may be different for different cache levels). It
> is found using CPUID, but is also provided in the "info" directory of
> -the resctrl file system in "info/{resource}/cbm_mask". Intel hardware
> +the resctrl file system in "info/{resource}/cbm_mask". Some Intel hardware
> requires that these masks have all the '1' bits in a contiguous block. So
> 0x3, 0x6 and 0xC are legal 4-bit masks with two bits set, but 0x5, 0x9
> -and 0xA are not. On a system with a 20-bit mask each bit represents 5%
> -of the capacity of the cache. You could partition the cache into four
> -equal parts with masks: 0x1f, 0x3e0, 0x7c00, 0xf8000.
> +and 0xA are not. Check /sys/fs/resctrl/info/{resource}/sparse_masks
> +if non-contiguous 1s value is supported. On a system with a 20-bit mask
> +each bit represents 5% of the capacity of the cache. You could partition
> +the cache into four equal parts with masks: 0x1f, 0x3e0, 0x7c00, 0xf8000.
>
> Memory bandwidth Allocation and monitoring
> ==========================================
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-27 22:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-22 8:47 [PATCH v2 0/4] x86/resctrl: Non-contiguous bitmasks in Intel CAT Maciej Wieczor-Retman
2023-09-22 8:48 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] x86/resctrl: Enable non-contiguous bits " Maciej Wieczor-Retman
2023-09-22 14:14 ` Peter Newman
2023-09-27 9:20 ` Maciej Wieczór-Retman
2023-09-27 10:08 ` Peter Newman
2023-09-27 10:44 ` Maciej Wieczór-Retman
2023-09-27 15:03 ` Tony Luck
2023-09-27 22:34 ` Moger, Babu
2023-09-28 7:06 ` Maciej Wieczór-Retman
2023-09-28 15:08 ` Moger, Babu
2023-09-28 15:53 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-09-28 16:28 ` Moger, Babu
2023-09-22 8:48 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] x86/resctrl: Add sparse_masks file in info Maciej Wieczor-Retman
2023-09-28 20:47 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-09-29 6:22 ` Maciej Wieczór-Retman
2023-09-22 8:48 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] Documentation/x86: Document resctrl's new sparse_masks Maciej Wieczor-Retman
2023-09-27 22:47 ` Moger, Babu [this message]
2023-09-27 22:58 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-09-27 23:02 ` Fenghua Yu
2023-09-28 13:59 ` Moger, Babu
2023-09-22 8:48 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] x86/resctrl: Rename arch_has_sparse_bitmaps Maciej Wieczor-Retman
2023-09-28 20:47 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-09-29 6:20 ` Maciej Wieczór-Retman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=17079b9e-4efd-4258-2b5f-afc6d3ae2c0f@amd.com \
--to=bmoger@amd.com \
--cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maciej.wieczor-retman@intel.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®