* [PATCH] PCI: qcom: Handle mixed PERST#/PHY DT configuration
@ 2026-05-08 9:54 Qiang Yu
2026-05-11 10:29 ` Konrad Dybcio
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Qiang Yu @ 2026-05-08 9:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam, Lorenzo Pieralisi,
Krzysztof Wilczyński, Rob Herring, Bjorn Helgaas
Cc: linux-arm-msm, linux-pci, linux-kernel, Manivannan Sadhasivam, Qiang Yu
The driver currently supports two PERST# and PHY DT configuration. In one
case, PHY, PERST#, are described in the RC node. In the other case, they
are described in the RP node.
A mixed setup is not supported. One common example is PHY on the RP node
while PERST# remains on the RC node. In that case the driver goes through
the RP parse path, does not find PERST# on RP, and does not report an
error because PERST# is optional. Probe can then succeed silently while
PERST# is left uncontrolled, and PCIe endpoints fails to work later. This
silent probe success makes debugging difficult.
Handle this mixed case in the RP parse path by checking whether PERST# is
present on RC and, if so, using the RC PERST# GPIO for RP ports while
keeping RP parsing for PHY. Emit a warning to indicate mixed DT content so
it can be fixed.
This keeps mixed systems functional and makes the configuration issue
visible instead of failing later at endpoint bring-up.
Suggested-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@oss.qualcomm.com>
Signed-off-by: Qiang Yu <qiang.yu@oss.qualcomm.com>
---
drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
index 9fdfc88ac151..8235961d692f 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
@@ -282,6 +282,7 @@ struct qcom_pcie {
const struct qcom_pcie_cfg *cfg;
struct dentry *debugfs;
struct list_head ports;
+ struct gpio_desc *reset;
bool suspended;
bool use_pm_opp;
};
@@ -1703,6 +1704,11 @@ static int qcom_pcie_parse_perst(struct qcom_pcie *pcie,
struct gpio_desc *reset;
int ret;
+ if (pcie->reset) {
+ reset = pcie->reset;
+ goto skip_perst_parsing;
+ }
+
if (!of_find_property(np, "reset-gpios", NULL))
goto parse_child_node;
@@ -1721,6 +1727,7 @@ static int qcom_pcie_parse_perst(struct qcom_pcie *pcie,
return PTR_ERR(reset);
}
+skip_perst_parsing:
perst = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*perst), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!perst)
return -ENOMEM;
@@ -1778,6 +1785,14 @@ static int qcom_pcie_parse_ports(struct qcom_pcie *pcie)
struct device *dev = pcie->pci->dev;
int ret = -ENODEV;
+ if (of_find_property(dev->of_node, "perst-gpios", NULL)) {
+ pcie->reset = devm_gpiod_get_optional(dev, "perst", GPIOD_OUT_HIGH);
+ if (IS_ERR(pcie->reset))
+ return PTR_ERR(pcie->reset);
+
+ dev_warn(dev, "Reusing PERST# from Root Complex node. DT needs to be fixed!\n");
+ }
+
for_each_available_child_of_node_scoped(dev->of_node, of_port) {
if (!of_node_is_type(of_port, "pci"))
continue;
---
base-commit: 33a76fc3c3e61386524479b99f35423bd3d9a895
change-id: 20260508-mix_perst_phy_dts-b741b840833b
Best regards,
--
Qiang Yu <qiang.yu@oss.qualcomm.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] PCI: qcom: Handle mixed PERST#/PHY DT configuration
2026-05-08 9:54 [PATCH] PCI: qcom: Handle mixed PERST#/PHY DT configuration Qiang Yu
@ 2026-05-11 10:29 ` Konrad Dybcio
2026-05-15 16:52 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-05-31 11:07 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Konrad Dybcio @ 2026-05-11 10:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Qiang Yu, Manivannan Sadhasivam, Lorenzo Pieralisi,
Krzysztof Wilczyński, Rob Herring, Bjorn Helgaas
Cc: linux-arm-msm, linux-pci, linux-kernel, Manivannan Sadhasivam
On 5/8/26 11:54 AM, Qiang Yu wrote:
> The driver currently supports two PERST# and PHY DT configuration. In one
> case, PHY, PERST#, are described in the RC node. In the other case, they
> are described in the RP node.
>
> A mixed setup is not supported. One common example is PHY on the RP node
> while PERST# remains on the RC node. In that case the driver goes through
> the RP parse path, does not find PERST# on RP, and does not report an
> error because PERST# is optional. Probe can then succeed silently while
> PERST# is left uncontrolled, and PCIe endpoints fails to work later. This
> silent probe success makes debugging difficult.
>
> Handle this mixed case in the RP parse path by checking whether PERST# is
> present on RC and, if so, using the RC PERST# GPIO for RP ports while
> keeping RP parsing for PHY. Emit a warning to indicate mixed DT content so
> it can be fixed.
>
> This keeps mixed systems functional and makes the configuration issue
> visible instead of failing later at endpoint bring-up.
>
> Suggested-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@oss.qualcomm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Qiang Yu <qiang.yu@oss.qualcomm.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
> index 9fdfc88ac151..8235961d692f 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
> @@ -282,6 +282,7 @@ struct qcom_pcie {
> const struct qcom_pcie_cfg *cfg;
> struct dentry *debugfs;
> struct list_head ports;
> + struct gpio_desc *reset;
I'd rename this to make it more obvious it's at the RC node.. but
rc_reset doesn't really sound great..
otherwise:
Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>
Konrad
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] PCI: qcom: Handle mixed PERST#/PHY DT configuration
2026-05-08 9:54 [PATCH] PCI: qcom: Handle mixed PERST#/PHY DT configuration Qiang Yu
2026-05-11 10:29 ` Konrad Dybcio
@ 2026-05-15 16:52 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-05-31 11:07 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam @ 2026-05-15 16:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lorenzo Pieralisi, Krzysztof Wilczyński, Rob Herring,
Bjorn Helgaas, Qiang Yu
Cc: linux-arm-msm, linux-pci, linux-kernel, Manivannan Sadhasivam
On Fri, 08 May 2026 02:54:19 -0700, Qiang Yu wrote:
> The driver currently supports two PERST# and PHY DT configuration. In one
> case, PHY, PERST#, are described in the RC node. In the other case, they
> are described in the RP node.
>
> A mixed setup is not supported. One common example is PHY on the RP node
> while PERST# remains on the RC node. In that case the driver goes through
> the RP parse path, does not find PERST# on RP, and does not report an
> error because PERST# is optional. Probe can then succeed silently while
> PERST# is left uncontrolled, and PCIe endpoints fails to work later. This
> silent probe success makes debugging difficult.
>
> [...]
Applied, thanks!
[1/1] PCI: qcom: Handle mixed PERST#/PHY DT configuration
commit: d160e4d32a8b94e534f7c491374b99cf44baa4e0
Best regards,
--
Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] PCI: qcom: Handle mixed PERST#/PHY DT configuration
2026-05-08 9:54 [PATCH] PCI: qcom: Handle mixed PERST#/PHY DT configuration Qiang Yu
2026-05-11 10:29 ` Konrad Dybcio
2026-05-15 16:52 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
@ 2026-05-31 11:07 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2026-06-02 4:34 ` Kathiravan Thirumoorthy
2 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Dmitry Baryshkov @ 2026-05-31 11:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Qiang Yu
Cc: Manivannan Sadhasivam, Lorenzo Pieralisi,
Krzysztof Wilczyński, Rob Herring, Bjorn Helgaas,
linux-arm-msm, linux-pci, linux-kernel, Manivannan Sadhasivam
On Fri, May 08, 2026 at 02:54:19AM -0700, Qiang Yu wrote:
> The driver currently supports two PERST# and PHY DT configuration. In one
> case, PHY, PERST#, are described in the RC node. In the other case, they
> are described in the RP node.
>
> A mixed setup is not supported. One common example is PHY on the RP node
> while PERST# remains on the RC node. In that case the driver goes through
> the RP parse path, does not find PERST# on RP, and does not report an
> error because PERST# is optional. Probe can then succeed silently while
> PERST# is left uncontrolled, and PCIe endpoints fails to work later. This
> silent probe success makes debugging difficult.
>
> Handle this mixed case in the RP parse path by checking whether PERST# is
> present on RC and, if so, using the RC PERST# GPIO for RP ports while
> keeping RP parsing for PHY. Emit a warning to indicate mixed DT content so
> it can be fixed.
>
> This keeps mixed systems functional and makes the configuration issue
> visible instead of failing later at endpoint bring-up.
>
> Suggested-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@oss.qualcomm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Qiang Yu <qiang.yu@oss.qualcomm.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
>
> @@ -1778,6 +1785,14 @@ static int qcom_pcie_parse_ports(struct qcom_pcie *pcie)
> struct device *dev = pcie->pci->dev;
> int ret = -ENODEV;
>
> + if (of_find_property(dev->of_node, "perst-gpios", NULL)) {
> + pcie->reset = devm_gpiod_get_optional(dev, "perst", GPIOD_OUT_HIGH);
> + if (IS_ERR(pcie->reset))
> + return PTR_ERR(pcie->reset);
> +
> + dev_warn(dev, "Reusing PERST# from Root Complex node. DT needs to be fixed!\n");
This patch breaks legacy DTs (I stumbled on it on SM8350 HDK), because
now devm_gpiod_get_optional() in qcom_pcie_parse_legacy_binding()
returns -EBUSY (as the GPIO is already requested here). I'll send a
patch fixing the issue, but it's sad to see existing platforms being
broken for the sake of undeclared "mixed" case.
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] PCI: qcom: Handle mixed PERST#/PHY DT configuration
2026-05-31 11:07 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
@ 2026-06-02 4:34 ` Kathiravan Thirumoorthy
2026-06-08 7:43 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Kathiravan Thirumoorthy @ 2026-06-02 4:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dmitry Baryshkov, Qiang Yu
Cc: Manivannan Sadhasivam, Lorenzo Pieralisi,
Krzysztof Wilczyński, Rob Herring, Bjorn Helgaas,
linux-arm-msm, linux-pci, linux-kernel, Manivannan Sadhasivam
On 5/31/2026 4:37 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Fri, May 08, 2026 at 02:54:19AM -0700, Qiang Yu wrote:
>> The driver currently supports two PERST# and PHY DT configuration. In one
>> case, PHY, PERST#, are described in the RC node. In the other case, they
>> are described in the RP node.
>>
>> A mixed setup is not supported. One common example is PHY on the RP node
>> while PERST# remains on the RC node. In that case the driver goes through
>> the RP parse path, does not find PERST# on RP, and does not report an
>> error because PERST# is optional. Probe can then succeed silently while
>> PERST# is left uncontrolled, and PCIe endpoints fails to work later. This
>> silent probe success makes debugging difficult.
>>
>> Handle this mixed case in the RP parse path by checking whether PERST# is
>> present on RC and, if so, using the RC PERST# GPIO for RP ports while
>> keeping RP parsing for PHY. Emit a warning to indicate mixed DT content so
>> it can be fixed.
>>
>> This keeps mixed systems functional and makes the configuration issue
>> visible instead of failing later at endpoint bring-up.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@oss.qualcomm.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Qiang Yu <qiang.yu@oss.qualcomm.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
>>
>> @@ -1778,6 +1785,14 @@ static int qcom_pcie_parse_ports(struct qcom_pcie *pcie)
>> struct device *dev = pcie->pci->dev;
>> int ret = -ENODEV;
>>
>> + if (of_find_property(dev->of_node, "perst-gpios", NULL)) {
>> + pcie->reset = devm_gpiod_get_optional(dev, "perst", GPIOD_OUT_HIGH);
>> + if (IS_ERR(pcie->reset))
>> + return PTR_ERR(pcie->reset);
>> +
>> + dev_warn(dev, "Reusing PERST# from Root Complex node. DT needs to be fixed!\n");
> This patch breaks legacy DTs (I stumbled on it on SM8350 HDK), because
> now devm_gpiod_get_optional() in qcom_pcie_parse_legacy_binding()
> returns -EBUSY (as the GPIO is already requested here). I'll send a
> patch fixing the issue, but it's sad to see existing platforms being
> broken for the sake of undeclared "mixed" case.
Dmitry,
I have sent[1] fix for this issue and it is squashed with the offending
commit itself[2] and part of controller/dwc-qcom in the PCI tree.
[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20260526-fix_perst_gpio_handling-v1-1-9170507bb4e9@oss.qualcomm.com/T/#u
[2]
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pci/pci.git/commit/?h=controller/dwc-qcom&id=1a23bcb452d95f099e530414504c0d99ee076b3f
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] PCI: qcom: Handle mixed PERST#/PHY DT configuration
2026-06-02 4:34 ` Kathiravan Thirumoorthy
@ 2026-06-08 7:43 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Dmitry Baryshkov @ 2026-06-08 7:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kathiravan Thirumoorthy
Cc: Qiang Yu, Manivannan Sadhasivam, Lorenzo Pieralisi,
Krzysztof Wilczyński, Rob Herring, Bjorn Helgaas,
linux-arm-msm, linux-pci, linux-kernel, Manivannan Sadhasivam
On Tue, Jun 02, 2026 at 10:04:22AM +0530, Kathiravan Thirumoorthy wrote:
>
> On 5/31/2026 4:37 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Fri, May 08, 2026 at 02:54:19AM -0700, Qiang Yu wrote:
> > > The driver currently supports two PERST# and PHY DT configuration. In one
> > > case, PHY, PERST#, are described in the RC node. In the other case, they
> > > are described in the RP node.
> > >
> > > A mixed setup is not supported. One common example is PHY on the RP node
> > > while PERST# remains on the RC node. In that case the driver goes through
> > > the RP parse path, does not find PERST# on RP, and does not report an
> > > error because PERST# is optional. Probe can then succeed silently while
> > > PERST# is left uncontrolled, and PCIe endpoints fails to work later. This
> > > silent probe success makes debugging difficult.
> > >
> > > Handle this mixed case in the RP parse path by checking whether PERST# is
> > > present on RC and, if so, using the RC PERST# GPIO for RP ports while
> > > keeping RP parsing for PHY. Emit a warning to indicate mixed DT content so
> > > it can be fixed.
> > >
> > > This keeps mixed systems functional and makes the configuration issue
> > > visible instead of failing later at endpoint bring-up.
> > >
> > > Suggested-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@oss.qualcomm.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Qiang Yu <qiang.yu@oss.qualcomm.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > @@ -1778,6 +1785,14 @@ static int qcom_pcie_parse_ports(struct qcom_pcie *pcie)
> > > struct device *dev = pcie->pci->dev;
> > > int ret = -ENODEV;
> > > + if (of_find_property(dev->of_node, "perst-gpios", NULL)) {
> > > + pcie->reset = devm_gpiod_get_optional(dev, "perst", GPIOD_OUT_HIGH);
> > > + if (IS_ERR(pcie->reset))
> > > + return PTR_ERR(pcie->reset);
> > > +
> > > + dev_warn(dev, "Reusing PERST# from Root Complex node. DT needs to be fixed!\n");
> > This patch breaks legacy DTs (I stumbled on it on SM8350 HDK), because
> > now devm_gpiod_get_optional() in qcom_pcie_parse_legacy_binding()
> > returns -EBUSY (as the GPIO is already requested here). I'll send a
> > patch fixing the issue, but it's sad to see existing platforms being
> > broken for the sake of undeclared "mixed" case.
>
> Dmitry,
>
> I have sent[1] fix for this issue and it is squashed with the offending
> commit itself[2] and part of controller/dwc-qcom in the PCI tree.
Ack, thanks
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20260526-fix_perst_gpio_handling-v1-1-9170507bb4e9@oss.qualcomm.com/T/#u
>
> [2] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pci/pci.git/commit/?h=controller/dwc-qcom&id=1a23bcb452d95f099e530414504c0d99ee076b3f
>
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-06-08 7:43 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-05-08 9:54 [PATCH] PCI: qcom: Handle mixed PERST#/PHY DT configuration Qiang Yu
2026-05-11 10:29 ` Konrad Dybcio
2026-05-15 16:52 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-05-31 11:07 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2026-06-02 4:34 ` Kathiravan Thirumoorthy
2026-06-08 7:43 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®