From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@googlemail.com>,
Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>,
Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
perfctr-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [patch] Performance Counters for Linux, v4
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 22:59:23 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <18758.18075.30744.666904@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081214212829.GA9435@elte.hu>
Ingo Molnar writes:
> For example, a full kernel build's statistics on a 16-way x86 box are:
>
> $ timec -e -5,-4,-3,1,2,3,5 make -j32 bzImage
>
> Performance counter stats for 'make':
>
> 142420.882 task clock ticks (millisecs)
>
> 9951033 pagefaults (events)
> 302628 context switches (events)
> 57810 CPU migrations (events)
> 208439082509 instructions (events)
> 657918810 cache references (events)
> 120243697 cache misses (events)
> 3134162468 branch misses (events)
Does this machine have sufficient hardware counters to count those
four hardware events at the same time? Or were those counters
timeshared onto 1 or 2 hardware counters? If it's the latter, are
those counts from half or a quarter of the total execution?
Paul.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-15 12:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-14 21:28 Ingo Molnar
2008-12-15 11:59 ` Paul Mackerras [this message]
2008-12-15 12:11 ` Paul Mackerras
2008-12-16 14:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-12-16 23:06 ` Paul Mackerras
2008-12-16 23:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-17 1:55 ` Andi Kleen
2009-01-16 18:01 ` Corey Ashford
2009-01-16 22:14 ` Maynard Johnson
2009-01-16 23:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-17 1:26 ` Paul Mackerras
2009-01-17 9:53 ` Andi Kleen
2008-12-17 2:23 ` [Perfctr-devel] " Dan Terpstra
2008-12-17 7:34 ` stephane eranian
2008-12-15 17:44 ` Vince Weaver
2008-12-15 21:07 ` Vince Weaver
2008-12-15 22:13 ` Paul Mackerras
2008-12-15 21:42 ` Paul Mackerras
2008-12-15 22:03 ` stephane eranian
2008-12-16 14:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-12-16 16:55 ` Vince Weaver
2008-12-16 21:52 ` Paul Mackerras
2008-12-16 12:22 ` Pavel Machek
2008-12-16 12:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-16 12:57 ` Pavel Machek
2008-12-16 13:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-16 13:13 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-12-16 20:04 ` Pavel Machek
2008-12-16 14:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-12-16 15:46 ` [Perfctr-devel] " Martin Cracauer
2008-12-16 17:38 ` Vince Weaver
2008-12-16 19:47 ` Corey Ashford
2008-12-16 20:55 ` Vince Weaver
2008-12-16 19:56 ` [Perfctr-devel] " William Cohen
2008-12-17 1:51 ` Andi Kleen
2008-12-17 1:56 ` Samuel Thibault
[not found] ` <d484eb1f0812162357n7a851f2fncc0abaae9bd293a4@mail.gmail.com>
2008-12-17 9:18 ` Andi Kleen
[not found] ` <d484eb1f0812170611s597e014cl5fb98d6dd81afd49@mail.gmail.com>
2008-12-17 15:06 ` Andi Kleen
2008-12-17 16:00 ` William Cohen
2008-12-17 20:53 ` Corey Ashford
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=18758.18075.30744.666904@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com \
--to=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eranian@googlemail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=perfctr-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=robert.richter@amd.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®