From: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
To: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>, Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@intel.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Libo Chen <libo.chen@oracle.com>,
Abel Wu <wuyun.abel@bytedance.com>,
Madadi Vineeth Reddy <vineethr@linux.ibm.com>,
Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>, Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
"Gautham R . Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC patch v3 08/20] sched: Set up LLC indexing
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2025 01:14:09 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1f7e5b4f-a3c3-4505-ae83-bf7dea918571@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <71e251a086be786fb2a0480bbab69142d14bd22d.1750268218.git.tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
On 6/18/25 23:57, Tim Chen wrote:
> Prepare for indexing arrays that track in each run queue: the number
> of tasks preferring current LLC and each of the other LLC.
>
> The reason to introduce LLC index is because the per LLC-scope data
> is needed to do cache aware load balancing. However, the native lld_id
> is usually the first CPU of that LLC domain, which is not continuous,
> which might waste the space if the per LLC-scope data is stored
> in an array (in current implementation).
>
> In the future, this LLC index could be removed after
> the native llc_id is used as the key to search into xarray based
> array.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> include/linux/sched.h | 3 +++
> kernel/sched/fair.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> kernel/sched/sched.h | 2 ++
> kernel/sched/topology.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 46 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> index d0e4cda2b3cd..7ce95a32e9ff 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -810,6 +810,9 @@ struct kmap_ctrl {
> #endif
> };
>
> +/* XXX need fix to not use magic number */
> +#define MAX_LLC 64
This number needs to be much higher. maybe keeping NR_CPUS wont hurt.
> +
> struct task_struct {
> #ifdef CONFIG_THREAD_INFO_IN_TASK
> /*
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 10ea408d0e40..5549710d95cf 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -1183,6 +1183,18 @@ static int llc_id(int cpu)
> return per_cpu(sd_llc_id, cpu);
> }
>
> +/*
> + * continous index.
> + * TBD: replace by xarray with key llc_id()
> + */
> +static inline int llc_idx(int cpu)
> +{
> + if (cpu < 0)
> + return -1;
> +
> + return per_cpu(sd_llc_idx, cpu);
> +}
> +
> void mm_init_sched(struct mm_struct *mm, struct mm_sched __percpu *_pcpu_sched)
> {
> unsigned long epoch;
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> index 1c6fd45c7f62..74eb2f3615aa 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
> +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> @@ -2037,6 +2037,7 @@ static inline struct sched_domain *lowest_flag_domain(int cpu, int flag)
> DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct sched_domain __rcu *, sd_llc);
> DECLARE_PER_CPU(int, sd_llc_size);
> DECLARE_PER_CPU(int, sd_llc_id);
> +DECLARE_PER_CPU(int, sd_llc_idx);
> DECLARE_PER_CPU(int, sd_share_id);
> DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct sched_domain_shared __rcu *, sd_llc_shared);
> DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct sched_domain __rcu *, sd_numa);
> @@ -2045,6 +2046,7 @@ DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct sched_domain __rcu *, sd_asym_cpucapacity);
>
> extern struct static_key_false sched_asym_cpucapacity;
> extern struct static_key_false sched_cluster_active;
> +extern int max_llcs;
>
> static __always_inline bool sched_asym_cpucap_active(void)
> {
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/topology.c b/kernel/sched/topology.c
> index f1ebc60d967f..b7bb13045dd8 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/topology.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/topology.c
> @@ -672,6 +672,7 @@ static void destroy_sched_domains(struct sched_domain *sd)
> DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct sched_domain __rcu *, sd_llc);
> DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, sd_llc_size);
> DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, sd_llc_id);
> +DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, sd_llc_idx);
> DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, sd_share_id);
> DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct sched_domain_shared __rcu *, sd_llc_shared);
> DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct sched_domain __rcu *, sd_numa);
> @@ -681,6 +682,25 @@ DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct sched_domain __rcu *, sd_asym_cpucapacity);
> DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(sched_asym_cpucapacity);
> DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(sched_cluster_active);
>
> +int max_llcs = -1;
> +
> +static void update_llc_idx(int cpu)
> +{
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CACHE
> + int idx = -1, llc_id = -1;
> +
> + llc_id = per_cpu(sd_llc_id, cpu);
> + idx = per_cpu(sd_llc_idx, llc_id);
> +
> + if (idx < 0) {
> + idx = max_llcs++;
> + BUG_ON(idx > MAX_LLC);
maybe a warning instead here?
> + per_cpu(sd_llc_idx, llc_id) = idx;
> + }
> + per_cpu(sd_llc_idx, cpu) = idx;
> +#endif
> +}
> +
> static void update_top_cache_domain(int cpu)
> {
> struct sched_domain_shared *sds = NULL;
> @@ -699,6 +719,7 @@ static void update_top_cache_domain(int cpu)
> per_cpu(sd_llc_size, cpu) = size;
> per_cpu(sd_llc_id, cpu) = id;
> rcu_assign_pointer(per_cpu(sd_llc_shared, cpu), sds);
> + update_llc_idx(cpu);
>
> sd = lowest_flag_domain(cpu, SD_CLUSTER);
> if (sd)
> @@ -2394,6 +2415,14 @@ build_sched_domains(const struct cpumask *cpu_map, struct sched_domain_attr *att
> bool has_asym = false;
> bool has_cluster = false;
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CACHE
> + if (max_llcs < 0) {
> + for_each_possible_cpu(i)
> + per_cpu(sd_llc_idx, i) = -1;
> + max_llcs = 0;
> + }
> +#endif
> +
> if (WARN_ON(cpumask_empty(cpu_map)))
> goto error;
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-03 19:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-18 18:27 [RFC patch v3 00/20] Cache aware scheduling Tim Chen
2025-06-18 18:27 ` [RFC patch v3 01/20] sched: Cache aware load-balancing Tim Chen
2025-06-26 12:23 ` Jianyong Wu
2025-06-26 13:32 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-06-27 0:10 ` Tim Chen
2025-06-27 2:13 ` Jianyong Wu
2025-07-03 19:29 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2025-07-04 8:40 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-07-04 8:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-07-04 8:54 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2025-07-07 19:57 ` Tim Chen
2025-06-18 18:27 ` [RFC patch v3 02/20] sched: Several fixes for cache aware scheduling Tim Chen
2025-07-03 19:33 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2025-07-07 21:02 ` Tim Chen
2025-07-08 1:15 ` Libo Chen
2025-07-08 7:54 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-07-08 15:47 ` Libo Chen
2025-06-18 18:27 ` [RFC patch v3 03/20] sched: Avoid task migration within its preferred LLC Tim Chen
2025-06-18 18:27 ` [RFC patch v3 04/20] sched: Avoid calculating the cpumask if the system is overloaded Tim Chen
2025-07-03 19:39 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2025-07-07 14:57 ` Tim Chen
2025-06-18 18:27 ` [RFC patch v3 05/20] sched: Add hysteresis to switch a task's preferred LLC Tim Chen
2025-07-02 6:47 ` Madadi Vineeth Reddy
2025-07-02 21:47 ` Tim Chen
2025-06-18 18:27 ` [RFC patch v3 06/20] sched: Save the per LLC utilization for better cache aware scheduling Tim Chen
2025-06-18 18:27 ` [RFC patch v3 07/20] sched: Add helper function to decide whether to allow " Tim Chen
2025-07-08 0:41 ` Libo Chen
2025-07-08 8:29 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-07-08 17:22 ` Libo Chen
2025-07-09 14:41 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-07-09 21:31 ` Libo Chen
2025-07-08 21:59 ` Tim Chen
2025-07-09 21:22 ` Libo Chen
2025-06-18 18:27 ` [RFC patch v3 08/20] sched: Set up LLC indexing Tim Chen
2025-07-03 19:44 ` Shrikanth Hegde [this message]
2025-07-04 9:36 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-06-18 18:27 ` [RFC patch v3 09/20] sched: Introduce task preferred LLC field Tim Chen
2025-06-18 18:27 ` [RFC patch v3 10/20] sched: Calculate the number of tasks that have LLC preference on a runqueue Tim Chen
2025-07-03 19:45 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2025-07-04 15:00 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-06-18 18:27 ` [RFC patch v3 11/20] sched: Introduce per runqueue task LLC preference counter Tim Chen
2025-06-18 18:28 ` [RFC patch v3 12/20] sched: Calculate the total number of preferred LLC tasks during load balance Tim Chen
2025-06-18 18:28 ` [RFC patch v3 13/20] sched: Tag the sched group as llc_balance if it has tasks prefer other LLC Tim Chen
2025-06-18 18:28 ` [RFC patch v3 14/20] sched: Introduce update_llc_busiest() to deal with groups having preferred LLC tasks Tim Chen
2025-07-03 19:52 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2025-07-05 2:26 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-06-18 18:28 ` [RFC patch v3 15/20] sched: Introduce a new migration_type to track the preferred LLC load balance Tim Chen
2025-06-18 18:28 ` [RFC patch v3 16/20] sched: Consider LLC locality for active balance Tim Chen
2025-06-18 18:28 ` [RFC patch v3 17/20] sched: Consider LLC preference when picking tasks from busiest queue Tim Chen
2025-06-18 18:28 ` [RFC patch v3 18/20] sched: Do not migrate task if it is moving out of its preferred LLC Tim Chen
2025-06-18 18:28 ` [RFC patch v3 19/20] sched: Introduce SCHED_CACHE_LB to control cache aware load balance Tim Chen
2025-06-18 18:28 ` [RFC patch v3 20/20] sched: Introduce SCHED_CACHE_WAKE to control LLC aggregation on wake up Tim Chen
2025-06-19 6:39 ` [RFC patch v3 00/20] Cache aware scheduling Yangyu Chen
2025-06-19 13:21 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-06-19 14:12 ` Yangyu Chen
2025-06-20 19:25 ` Madadi Vineeth Reddy
2025-06-22 0:39 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-06-24 17:47 ` Madadi Vineeth Reddy
2025-06-23 16:45 ` Tim Chen
2025-06-24 5:00 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-06-24 12:16 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-06-25 4:19 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-06-25 0:30 ` Tim Chen
2025-06-25 4:30 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-07-03 20:00 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2025-07-04 10:09 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-07-09 19:39 ` Madadi Vineeth Reddy
2025-07-10 3:33 ` Chen, Yu C
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1f7e5b4f-a3c3-4505-ae83-bf7dea918571@linux.ibm.com \
--to=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
--cc=hdanton@sina.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=libo.chen@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tim.c.chen@intel.com \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vineethr@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=wuyun.abel@bytedance.com \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®