mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
To: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>, Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
	Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@intel.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Libo Chen <libo.chen@oracle.com>,
	Abel Wu <wuyun.abel@bytedance.com>,
	Madadi Vineeth Reddy <vineethr@linux.ibm.com>,
	Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>, Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
	"Gautham R . Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC patch v3 10/20] sched: Calculate the number of tasks that have LLC preference on a runqueue
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2025 01:15:35 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b5e454a8-6533-446b-9546-37fc63e9089e@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0664be8a3e805ed93eb930131951b1a84cebed66.1750268218.git.tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>



On 6/18/25 23:57, Tim Chen wrote:
> Track for each run queue, the number of tasks that have a LLC preference
> and how many of those tasks are running in its preferred LLC.  This is
> similar to nr_numa_running and nr_preferred_running for NUMA balance,
> and will be used by the cache-aware load balancing in subsequent patches.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>   kernel/sched/core.c  | 12 ++++++++++++
>   kernel/sched/fair.c  | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>   kernel/sched/sched.h |  7 +++++++
>   3 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index d9c3e75f79d1..34056eb79ef2 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -498,6 +498,18 @@ void __trace_set_current_state(int state_value)
>   }
>   EXPORT_SYMBOL(__trace_set_current_state);
>   
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP


CONFIG_SMP is true unconditionally now. Else may need to go.

> +int task_llc(const struct task_struct *p)
> +{
> +	return per_cpu(sd_llc_id, task_cpu(p));
> +}
> +#else
> +int task_llc(const struct task_struct *p)
> +{
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
>   /*
>    * Serialization rules:
>    *
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index cc804a8c7061..88ff47194faa 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -1195,6 +1195,18 @@ static inline int llc_idx(int cpu)
>   	return per_cpu(sd_llc_idx, cpu);
>   }
>   
> +static void account_llc_enqueue(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
> +{
> +	rq->nr_llc_running += (p->preferred_llc != -1);
> +	rq->nr_pref_llc_running += (p->preferred_llc == task_llc(p));
> +}
> +
> +static void account_llc_dequeue(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
> +{
> +	rq->nr_llc_running -= (p->preferred_llc != -1);
> +	rq->nr_pref_llc_running -= (p->preferred_llc == task_llc(p));
> +}
> +
>   void mm_init_sched(struct mm_struct *mm, struct mm_sched __percpu *_pcpu_sched)
>   {
>   	unsigned long epoch;
> @@ -1298,8 +1310,11 @@ void account_mm_sched(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, s64 delta_exec)
>   	if (mm->mm_sched_cpu != -1)
>   		mm_sched_llc = per_cpu(sd_llc_id, mm->mm_sched_cpu);
>   
> -	if (p->preferred_llc != mm_sched_llc)
> +	if (p->preferred_llc != mm_sched_llc) {
> +		account_llc_dequeue(rq, p);
>   		p->preferred_llc = mm_sched_llc;
> +		account_llc_enqueue(rq, p);
> +	}
>   }
>   
>   static void task_tick_cache(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
> @@ -1400,6 +1415,14 @@ void init_sched_mm(struct task_struct *p)
>   	work->next = work;
>   }
>   
> +void reset_llc_stats(struct rq *rq)
> +{
> +	if (rq->nr_llc_running)
> +		rq->nr_llc_running = 0;
> +
> +	rq->nr_pref_llc_running = 0;
> +}
> +
>   #else
>   
>   static inline void account_mm_sched(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p,
> @@ -1410,6 +1433,17 @@ void init_sched_mm(struct task_struct *p) { }
>   
>   static void task_tick_cache(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p) { }
>   
> +static void account_llc_enqueue(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
> +{
> +}
> +
> +static void account_llc_dequeue(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
> +{
> +}
> +
> +void reset_llc_stats(struct rq *rq)
> +{
> +}
>   #endif
>   
>   static inline
> @@ -3939,6 +3973,7 @@ account_entity_enqueue(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se)
>   		struct rq *rq = rq_of(cfs_rq);
>   
>   		account_numa_enqueue(rq, task_of(se));
> +		account_llc_enqueue(rq, task_of(se));
>   		list_add(&se->group_node, &rq->cfs_tasks);
>   	}
>   #endif
> @@ -3952,10 +3987,15 @@ account_entity_dequeue(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se)
>   #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>   	if (entity_is_task(se)) {
>   		account_numa_dequeue(rq_of(cfs_rq), task_of(se));
> +		account_llc_dequeue(rq_of(cfs_rq), task_of(se));
>   		list_del_init(&se->group_node);
>   	}
>   #endif
>   	cfs_rq->nr_queued--;
> +
> +	/* safeguard? */
> +	if (!parent_entity(se) && !cfs_rq->nr_queued)
> +		reset_llc_stats(rq_of(cfs_rq));
>   }
>   
>   /*
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> index 74eb2f3615aa..6c83a71ac8ca 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
> +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> @@ -1104,6 +1104,10 @@ struct rq {
>   	unsigned int		nr_preferred_running;
>   	unsigned int		numa_migrate_on;
>   #endif
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CACHE
> +	unsigned int		nr_pref_llc_running;
> +	unsigned int		nr_llc_running;
> +#endif
>   #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON
>   #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>   	unsigned long		last_blocked_load_update_tick;
> @@ -1948,6 +1952,9 @@ init_numa_balancing(unsigned long clone_flags, struct task_struct *p)
>   
>   #endif /* !CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING */
>   
> +extern void reset_llc_stats(struct rq *rq);
> +extern int task_llc(const struct task_struct *p);
> +
>   #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>   
>   static inline void


  reply	other threads:[~2025-07-03 19:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-18 18:27 [RFC patch v3 00/20] Cache aware scheduling Tim Chen
2025-06-18 18:27 ` [RFC patch v3 01/20] sched: Cache aware load-balancing Tim Chen
2025-06-26 12:23   ` Jianyong Wu
2025-06-26 13:32     ` Chen, Yu C
2025-06-27  0:10       ` Tim Chen
2025-06-27  2:13         ` Jianyong Wu
2025-07-03 19:29   ` Shrikanth Hegde
2025-07-04  8:40     ` Chen, Yu C
2025-07-04  8:45       ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-07-04  8:54         ` Shrikanth Hegde
2025-07-07 19:57     ` Tim Chen
2025-06-18 18:27 ` [RFC patch v3 02/20] sched: Several fixes for cache aware scheduling Tim Chen
2025-07-03 19:33   ` Shrikanth Hegde
2025-07-07 21:02     ` Tim Chen
2025-07-08  1:15   ` Libo Chen
2025-07-08  7:54     ` Chen, Yu C
2025-07-08 15:47       ` Libo Chen
2025-06-18 18:27 ` [RFC patch v3 03/20] sched: Avoid task migration within its preferred LLC Tim Chen
2025-06-18 18:27 ` [RFC patch v3 04/20] sched: Avoid calculating the cpumask if the system is overloaded Tim Chen
2025-07-03 19:39   ` Shrikanth Hegde
2025-07-07 14:57     ` Tim Chen
2025-06-18 18:27 ` [RFC patch v3 05/20] sched: Add hysteresis to switch a task's preferred LLC Tim Chen
2025-07-02  6:47   ` Madadi Vineeth Reddy
2025-07-02 21:47     ` Tim Chen
2025-06-18 18:27 ` [RFC patch v3 06/20] sched: Save the per LLC utilization for better cache aware scheduling Tim Chen
2025-06-18 18:27 ` [RFC patch v3 07/20] sched: Add helper function to decide whether to allow " Tim Chen
2025-07-08  0:41   ` Libo Chen
2025-07-08  8:29     ` Chen, Yu C
2025-07-08 17:22       ` Libo Chen
2025-07-09 14:41         ` Chen, Yu C
2025-07-09 21:31           ` Libo Chen
2025-07-08 21:59     ` Tim Chen
2025-07-09 21:22       ` Libo Chen
2025-06-18 18:27 ` [RFC patch v3 08/20] sched: Set up LLC indexing Tim Chen
2025-07-03 19:44   ` Shrikanth Hegde
2025-07-04  9:36     ` Chen, Yu C
2025-06-18 18:27 ` [RFC patch v3 09/20] sched: Introduce task preferred LLC field Tim Chen
2025-06-18 18:27 ` [RFC patch v3 10/20] sched: Calculate the number of tasks that have LLC preference on a runqueue Tim Chen
2025-07-03 19:45   ` Shrikanth Hegde [this message]
2025-07-04 15:00     ` Chen, Yu C
2025-06-18 18:27 ` [RFC patch v3 11/20] sched: Introduce per runqueue task LLC preference counter Tim Chen
2025-06-18 18:28 ` [RFC patch v3 12/20] sched: Calculate the total number of preferred LLC tasks during load balance Tim Chen
2025-06-18 18:28 ` [RFC patch v3 13/20] sched: Tag the sched group as llc_balance if it has tasks prefer other LLC Tim Chen
2025-06-18 18:28 ` [RFC patch v3 14/20] sched: Introduce update_llc_busiest() to deal with groups having preferred LLC tasks Tim Chen
2025-07-03 19:52   ` Shrikanth Hegde
2025-07-05  2:26     ` Chen, Yu C
2025-06-18 18:28 ` [RFC patch v3 15/20] sched: Introduce a new migration_type to track the preferred LLC load balance Tim Chen
2025-06-18 18:28 ` [RFC patch v3 16/20] sched: Consider LLC locality for active balance Tim Chen
2025-06-18 18:28 ` [RFC patch v3 17/20] sched: Consider LLC preference when picking tasks from busiest queue Tim Chen
2025-06-18 18:28 ` [RFC patch v3 18/20] sched: Do not migrate task if it is moving out of its preferred LLC Tim Chen
2025-06-18 18:28 ` [RFC patch v3 19/20] sched: Introduce SCHED_CACHE_LB to control cache aware load balance Tim Chen
2025-06-18 18:28 ` [RFC patch v3 20/20] sched: Introduce SCHED_CACHE_WAKE to control LLC aggregation on wake up Tim Chen
2025-06-19  6:39 ` [RFC patch v3 00/20] Cache aware scheduling Yangyu Chen
2025-06-19 13:21   ` Chen, Yu C
2025-06-19 14:12     ` Yangyu Chen
2025-06-20 19:25 ` Madadi Vineeth Reddy
2025-06-22  0:39   ` Chen, Yu C
2025-06-24 17:47     ` Madadi Vineeth Reddy
2025-06-23 16:45   ` Tim Chen
2025-06-24  5:00 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-06-24 12:16   ` Chen, Yu C
2025-06-25  4:19     ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-06-25  0:30   ` Tim Chen
2025-06-25  4:30     ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-07-03 20:00   ` Shrikanth Hegde
2025-07-04 10:09     ` Chen, Yu C
2025-07-09 19:39 ` Madadi Vineeth Reddy
2025-07-10  3:33   ` Chen, Yu C

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b5e454a8-6533-446b-9546-37fc63e9089e@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
    --cc=hdanton@sina.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=libo.chen@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tim.c.chen@intel.com \
    --cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vineethr@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    --cc=wuyun.abel@bytedance.com \
    --cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®