From: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
"Gautham R . Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>
Cc: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@intel.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Libo Chen <libo.chen@oracle.com>,
Abel Wu <wuyun.abel@bytedance.com>,
Madadi Vineeth Reddy <vineethr@linux.ibm.com>,
Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>, Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC patch v3 02/20] sched: Several fixes for cache aware scheduling
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2025 11:27:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d73418022de76dab9f60c0c5432d783b3b2833dc.1750268218.git.tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1750268218.git.tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
From: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
1. Fix compile error on percpu allocation.
2. Enqueue to the target CPU rather than the current CPU.
3. NULL LLC sched domain check(Libo Chen).
4. Introduce sched feature SCHED_CACHE to control cache aware scheduling
5. Fix unsigned occupancy initialization to -1.
6. If there is only 1 thread in the process, no need to enable cache
awareness
7. Add __maybe_unused to __migrate_degrades_locality() to
avoid compile warnings.
Signed-off-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
---
include/linux/mm_types.h | 4 ++--
kernel/sched/fair.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++-----------
kernel/sched/features.h | 1 +
3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/mm_types.h b/include/linux/mm_types.h
index 013291c6aaa2..9de4a0a13c4d 100644
--- a/include/linux/mm_types.h
+++ b/include/linux/mm_types.h
@@ -1411,11 +1411,11 @@ static inline void mm_set_cpus_allowed(struct mm_struct *mm, const struct cpumas
#endif /* CONFIG_SCHED_MM_CID */
#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CACHE
-extern void mm_init_sched(struct mm_struct *mm, struct mm_sched *pcpu_sched);
+extern void mm_init_sched(struct mm_struct *mm, struct mm_sched __percpu *pcpu_sched);
static inline int mm_alloc_sched_noprof(struct mm_struct *mm)
{
- struct mm_sched *pcpu_sched = alloc_percpu_noprof(struct mm_sched);
+ struct mm_sched __percpu *pcpu_sched = alloc_percpu_noprof(struct mm_sched);
if (!pcpu_sched)
return -ENOMEM;
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index df7d4a324fbe..89db97f8ef02 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -1175,7 +1175,7 @@ static s64 update_curr_se(struct rq *rq, struct sched_entity *curr)
#define EPOCH_PERIOD (HZ/100) /* 10 ms */
#define EPOCH_OLD 5 /* 50 ms */
-void mm_init_sched(struct mm_struct *mm, struct mm_sched *_pcpu_sched)
+void mm_init_sched(struct mm_struct *mm, struct mm_sched __percpu *_pcpu_sched)
{
unsigned long epoch;
int i;
@@ -1186,7 +1186,7 @@ void mm_init_sched(struct mm_struct *mm, struct mm_sched *_pcpu_sched)
pcpu_sched->runtime = 0;
pcpu_sched->epoch = epoch = rq->cpu_epoch;
- pcpu_sched->occ = -1;
+ pcpu_sched->occ = 0;
}
raw_spin_lock_init(&mm->mm_sched_lock);
@@ -1254,7 +1254,7 @@ void account_mm_sched(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, s64 delta_exec)
if (!mm || !mm->pcpu_sched)
return;
- pcpu_sched = this_cpu_ptr(p->mm->pcpu_sched);
+ pcpu_sched = per_cpu_ptr(p->mm->pcpu_sched, cpu_of(rq));
scoped_guard (raw_spinlock, &rq->cpu_epoch_lock) {
__update_mm_sched(rq, pcpu_sched);
@@ -1264,12 +1264,14 @@ void account_mm_sched(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, s64 delta_exec)
}
/*
- * If this task hasn't hit task_cache_work() for a while, invalidate
+ * If this task hasn't hit task_cache_work() for a while, or it
+ * has only 1 thread, invalidate
* it's preferred state.
*/
- if (epoch - READ_ONCE(mm->mm_sched_epoch) > EPOCH_OLD) {
+ if (epoch - READ_ONCE(mm->mm_sched_epoch) > EPOCH_OLD ||
+ get_nr_threads(p) <= 1) {
mm->mm_sched_cpu = -1;
- pcpu_sched->occ = -1;
+ pcpu_sched->occ = 0;
}
}
@@ -1286,9 +1288,6 @@ static void task_tick_cache(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
guard(raw_spinlock)(&mm->mm_sched_lock);
- if (mm->mm_sched_epoch == rq->cpu_epoch)
- return;
-
if (work->next == work) {
task_work_add(p, work, TWA_RESUME);
WRITE_ONCE(mm->mm_sched_epoch, rq->cpu_epoch);
@@ -1322,6 +1321,9 @@ static void task_cache_work(struct callback_head *work)
unsigned long occ, m_occ = 0, a_occ = 0;
int m_cpu = -1, nr = 0, i;
+ if (!sd)
+ continue;
+
for_each_cpu(i, sched_domain_span(sd)) {
occ = fraction_mm_sched(cpu_rq(i),
per_cpu_ptr(mm->pcpu_sched, i));
@@ -8801,6 +8803,9 @@ static int select_cache_cpu(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu)
struct mm_struct *mm = p->mm;
int cpu;
+ if (!sched_feat(SCHED_CACHE))
+ return prev_cpu;
+
if (!mm || p->nr_cpus_allowed == 1)
return prev_cpu;
@@ -9555,7 +9560,7 @@ static int task_hot(struct task_struct *p, struct lb_env *env)
return 0;
#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CACHE
- if (p->mm && p->mm->pcpu_sched) {
+ if (sched_feat(SCHED_CACHE) && p->mm && p->mm->pcpu_sched) {
/*
* XXX things like Skylake have non-inclusive L3 and might not
* like this L3 centric view. What to do about L2 stickyness ?
@@ -9633,7 +9638,7 @@ static long migrate_degrades_locality(struct task_struct *p, struct lb_env *env)
}
#else
-static long __migrate_degrades_locality(struct task_struct *p, int src_cpu, int dst_cpu, bool idle)
+static __maybe_unused long __migrate_degrades_locality(struct task_struct *p, int src_cpu, int dst_cpu, bool idle)
{
return 0;
}
diff --git a/kernel/sched/features.h b/kernel/sched/features.h
index 3c12d9f93331..d2af7bfd36bf 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/features.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/features.h
@@ -87,6 +87,7 @@ SCHED_FEAT(TTWU_QUEUE, true)
*/
SCHED_FEAT(SIS_UTIL, true)
+SCHED_FEAT(SCHED_CACHE, true)
/*
* Issue a WARN when we do multiple update_rq_clock() calls
* in a single rq->lock section. Default disabled because the
--
2.32.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-18 18:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-18 18:27 [RFC patch v3 00/20] Cache " Tim Chen
2025-06-18 18:27 ` [RFC patch v3 01/20] sched: Cache aware load-balancing Tim Chen
2025-06-26 12:23 ` Jianyong Wu
2025-06-26 13:32 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-06-27 0:10 ` Tim Chen
2025-06-27 2:13 ` Jianyong Wu
2025-07-03 19:29 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2025-07-04 8:40 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-07-04 8:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-07-04 8:54 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2025-07-07 19:57 ` Tim Chen
2025-06-18 18:27 ` Tim Chen [this message]
2025-07-03 19:33 ` [RFC patch v3 02/20] sched: Several fixes for cache aware scheduling Shrikanth Hegde
2025-07-07 21:02 ` Tim Chen
2025-07-08 1:15 ` Libo Chen
2025-07-08 7:54 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-07-08 15:47 ` Libo Chen
2025-06-18 18:27 ` [RFC patch v3 03/20] sched: Avoid task migration within its preferred LLC Tim Chen
2025-06-18 18:27 ` [RFC patch v3 04/20] sched: Avoid calculating the cpumask if the system is overloaded Tim Chen
2025-07-03 19:39 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2025-07-07 14:57 ` Tim Chen
2025-06-18 18:27 ` [RFC patch v3 05/20] sched: Add hysteresis to switch a task's preferred LLC Tim Chen
2025-07-02 6:47 ` Madadi Vineeth Reddy
2025-07-02 21:47 ` Tim Chen
2025-06-18 18:27 ` [RFC patch v3 06/20] sched: Save the per LLC utilization for better cache aware scheduling Tim Chen
2025-06-18 18:27 ` [RFC patch v3 07/20] sched: Add helper function to decide whether to allow " Tim Chen
2025-07-08 0:41 ` Libo Chen
2025-07-08 8:29 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-07-08 17:22 ` Libo Chen
2025-07-09 14:41 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-07-09 21:31 ` Libo Chen
2025-07-08 21:59 ` Tim Chen
2025-07-09 21:22 ` Libo Chen
2025-06-18 18:27 ` [RFC patch v3 08/20] sched: Set up LLC indexing Tim Chen
2025-07-03 19:44 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2025-07-04 9:36 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-06-18 18:27 ` [RFC patch v3 09/20] sched: Introduce task preferred LLC field Tim Chen
2025-06-18 18:27 ` [RFC patch v3 10/20] sched: Calculate the number of tasks that have LLC preference on a runqueue Tim Chen
2025-07-03 19:45 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2025-07-04 15:00 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-06-18 18:27 ` [RFC patch v3 11/20] sched: Introduce per runqueue task LLC preference counter Tim Chen
2025-06-18 18:28 ` [RFC patch v3 12/20] sched: Calculate the total number of preferred LLC tasks during load balance Tim Chen
2025-06-18 18:28 ` [RFC patch v3 13/20] sched: Tag the sched group as llc_balance if it has tasks prefer other LLC Tim Chen
2025-06-18 18:28 ` [RFC patch v3 14/20] sched: Introduce update_llc_busiest() to deal with groups having preferred LLC tasks Tim Chen
2025-07-03 19:52 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2025-07-05 2:26 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-06-18 18:28 ` [RFC patch v3 15/20] sched: Introduce a new migration_type to track the preferred LLC load balance Tim Chen
2025-06-18 18:28 ` [RFC patch v3 16/20] sched: Consider LLC locality for active balance Tim Chen
2025-06-18 18:28 ` [RFC patch v3 17/20] sched: Consider LLC preference when picking tasks from busiest queue Tim Chen
2025-06-18 18:28 ` [RFC patch v3 18/20] sched: Do not migrate task if it is moving out of its preferred LLC Tim Chen
2025-06-18 18:28 ` [RFC patch v3 19/20] sched: Introduce SCHED_CACHE_LB to control cache aware load balance Tim Chen
2025-06-18 18:28 ` [RFC patch v3 20/20] sched: Introduce SCHED_CACHE_WAKE to control LLC aggregation on wake up Tim Chen
2025-06-19 6:39 ` [RFC patch v3 00/20] Cache aware scheduling Yangyu Chen
2025-06-19 13:21 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-06-19 14:12 ` Yangyu Chen
2025-06-20 19:25 ` Madadi Vineeth Reddy
2025-06-22 0:39 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-06-24 17:47 ` Madadi Vineeth Reddy
2025-06-23 16:45 ` Tim Chen
2025-06-24 5:00 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-06-24 12:16 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-06-25 4:19 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-06-25 0:30 ` Tim Chen
2025-06-25 4:30 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-07-03 20:00 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2025-07-04 10:09 ` Chen, Yu C
2025-07-09 19:39 ` Madadi Vineeth Reddy
2025-07-10 3:33 ` Chen, Yu C
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d73418022de76dab9f60c0c5432d783b3b2833dc.1750268218.git.tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--to=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
--cc=hdanton@sina.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=libo.chen@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tim.c.chen@intel.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vineethr@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=wuyun.abel@bytedance.com \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®