mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: serue@us.ibm.com
To: serue@us.ibm.com
Cc: James Morris <jmorris@redhat.com>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>,
	Stephen Smalley <sds@epoch.ncsc.mil>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Stacker - single-use static slots
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005 12:34:16 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050805173416.GA8991@sergelap.austin.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050805172720.GA8870@sergelap.austin.ibm.com>

Quoting serue@us.ibm.com (serue@us.ibm.com):
> Quoting James Morris (jmorris@redhat.com):
> > On Wed, 3 Aug 2005 serue@us.ibm.com wrote:
> > 
> > > The attached patch implements your idea on top of my previous patchset.
> > > Following is performance data on a 16-way ppc.  dbench and tbench were
> > > run 50 times, kernbench and reaim 10 times each;  results are mean +/-
> > > 95% confidence half-interval.  The 'static slot' kernel had a single
> > > static slot for selinux, plus the (unused in this case) shared struct
> > > hlist_head security.
> > 
> > Can you also compare with no stacker at all (i.e. just SELinux with caps 
> > as secondary module) ?
> 
> Will do.
> 
> I'll try to get a full set of numbers by next week, comparing:
> 
> 	no stacker
> 	"original" stacker
> 	stacker with one shared slot
> 	stacker with two shared slots

Obviously, I meant to say stacker with one static slot (and one shared
slot), and stacker with two static slots (and one shared slot)  :)

thanks,
-serge

  reply	other threads:[~2005-08-05 16:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-07-27 18:17 [patch 0/15] lsm stacking v0.3: intro serue
2005-07-27 18:19 ` [patch 1/15] lsm stacking v0.3: introduce securityfs serue
2005-07-27 18:20   ` [patch 2/15] lsm stacking v0.3: add module * to security_ops serue
2005-07-27 18:21   ` [patch 3/15] lsm stacking v0.3: don't default to dummy_##hook serue
2005-07-27 18:23   ` [patch 4/15] lsm stacking v0.3: swith ->security to hlist serue
2005-07-27 18:24   ` [patch 5/15] lsm stacking v0.3: introduce security_*_value API serue
2005-07-27 18:24   ` [patch 6/15] lsm stacking v0.3: stacker documentation serue
2005-07-27 18:24   ` [patch 7/15] lsm stacking v0.3: actual stacker module serue
2005-07-27 18:25   ` [patch 8/15] lsm stacking v0.3: stackable capabilities lsm serue
2005-07-27 18:26   ` [patch 9/15] lsm stacking v0.3: selinux: update ->security structs serue
2005-07-27 18:26   ` [patch 10/15] lsm stacking v0.3: selinux: use security_*_value API serue
2005-07-27 18:27   ` [patch 11/15] lsm stacking v0.3: selinux: remove secondary support serue
2005-07-27 18:27   ` [patch 12/15] lsm stacking v0.3: hook completeness verification script serue
2005-07-27 18:28   ` [patch 13/15] lsm stacking v0.3: seclvl: update for stacking serue
2005-07-27 18:28   ` [patch 14/15] lsm stacking v0.3: fix security_{del,unlink}_value race serue
2005-07-27 18:28   ` [patch 15/15] lsm stacking v0.3: stacking for digsig serue
2005-07-27 19:34 ` [patch 0/15] lsm stacking v0.3: intro James Morris
2005-07-27 19:37   ` James Morris
2005-08-03 16:45     ` [PATCH] Stacker - single-use static slots serue
2005-08-03 17:57       ` Chris Wright
2005-08-03 19:27         ` serue
2005-08-03 19:45           ` Chris Wright
2005-08-03 20:31             ` serge
2005-08-05 15:55       ` James Morris
2005-08-05 17:27         ` serue
2005-08-05 17:34           ` serue [this message]
2005-08-10 14:45         ` serue
2005-08-11  7:42           ` James Morris
2005-08-11 21:22             ` serue
2005-08-11 23:02               ` James Morris
2005-07-27 19:54   ` [patch 0/15] lsm stacking v0.3: intro serue
2005-07-30  5:07 ` Tony Jones
2005-07-30 19:02   ` serge
2005-07-30 20:18     ` Tony Jones
2005-07-31  3:22       ` Steve Beattie
2005-07-31  3:44         ` serge
2005-07-31  4:13           ` Tony Jones
2005-07-31 13:37             ` serge
2005-07-31  3:53       ` serge

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050805173416.GA8991@sergelap.austin.ibm.com \
    --to=serue@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=chrisw@osdl.org \
    --cc=jmorris@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sds@epoch.ncsc.mil \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®