From: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
To: Andy Isaacson <adi@hexapodia.org>
Cc: Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@cyclades.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: swsusp performance problems in 2.6.15-rc3-mm1
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 13:18:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051206121835.GN1770@elf.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051206020626.GO22168@hexapodia.org>
Hi!
> Newer kernels write and read a bigger image, which makes the prompt show
> up somewhat later, but gives the benefit of putting me back in
> approximately the same place I left off with regards to working set.
>
> I would like the best of both worlds - I want my suspend to go faster
> (so I want a smaller image), and I also want my working set paged back
> in after resume.
>
> I'm assuming that the difference is that with Rafael's patches, clean
> pages that would have been evicted in the "freeing pages..." step are
> now being written out to the swsusp image. If so, this is a waste - no
> point in having the data on disk twice. (It would be nice to confirm
> this suspicion.)
Confirmed. But you are wrong; it is not a waste. The pages are nicely
linear in suspend image, while they would be all over the disk
otherwise. There can easily be factor 20 difference between linear
read and random read.
> Could we rework it to avoid writing clean pages out to the swsusp image,
> but keep a list of those pages and read them back in *after* having
> resumed? Maybe do the /dev/initrd ('less +/once Documentation/initrd.txt'
> if you're not familiar with it) trick to make the list of pages available
> to a userland helper.
I did not understand this one.
> Someone suggested the 'cat `grep / /proc/*/maps`' trick. This kills the
> working set calculations that the kernel has so painstakingly built up,
> reading in all kinds of pages that were flushed with good reason, and
> also fails to get my Mercurial .d files back into cache, since they are
> not mapped by any long-running process.
Yes, that was very rough approximation.
Anyway, try limiting size of image to ~500MB, first. Should solve your
problem with very little work.
Pavel
--
Thanks, Sharp!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-12-06 12:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-12-05 8:19 Andy Isaacson
2005-12-05 12:17 ` Pavel Machek
2005-12-05 13:58 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-12-05 17:29 ` Pavel Machek
2005-12-05 21:11 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-12-05 23:34 ` Pavel Machek
2005-12-06 1:26 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-12-06 1:52 ` Pavel Machek
2005-12-05 22:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-12-06 0:01 ` Pavel Machek
2005-12-05 22:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-12-06 1:07 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-12-06 1:37 ` Pavel Machek
2005-12-06 1:47 ` Andy Isaacson
2005-12-06 1:56 ` IDE performance on notebooks [was Re: swsusp performance problems in 2.6.15-rc3-mm1] Pavel Machek
2005-12-06 6:23 ` Andy Isaacson
2005-12-06 11:56 ` Pavel Machek
2005-12-06 1:57 ` swsusp performance problems in 2.6.15-rc3-mm1 Nigel Cunningham
2005-12-06 3:50 ` Mark Lord
2005-12-06 15:03 ` Mark Lord
2005-12-06 2:02 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-12-06 12:09 ` Pavel Machek
2005-12-06 1:36 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-12-06 2:06 ` Andy Isaacson
2005-12-06 2:21 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-12-06 14:22 ` Pavel Machek
2005-12-07 22:05 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-12-07 22:23 ` Pavel Machek
2005-12-06 2:21 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-12-06 12:18 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2005-12-06 18:15 ` Andy Isaacson
2005-12-07 1:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-12-07 1:10 ` Pavel Machek
2005-12-07 11:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-12-07 11:30 ` Pavel Machek
2005-12-08 22:42 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-12-08 22:50 ` Pavel Machek
2005-12-05 21:18 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-12-05 23:55 ` swsusp: how much memory to free? [was Re: swsusp performance problems in 2.6.15-rc3-mm1] Pavel Machek
2005-12-07 11:53 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-12-07 11:59 ` Pavel Machek
2005-12-07 12:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-12-07 12:18 ` Pavel Machek
2005-12-05 23:05 ` swsusp performance problems in 2.6.15-rc3-mm1 Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-12-06 0:12 ` Andy Isaacson
2005-12-06 0:51 ` Pavel Machek
2005-12-10 22:21 ` Andrew Morton
2005-12-10 23:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-12-10 23:33 ` Andrew Morton
2005-12-11 12:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-12-11 23:28 ` Pavel Machek
2005-12-12 17:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051206121835.GN1770@elf.ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@suse.cz \
--cc=adi@hexapodia.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ncunningham@cyclades.com \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®