mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: Andy Isaacson <adi@hexapodia.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: swsusp: how much memory to free? [was Re: swsusp performance problems in 2.6.15-rc3-mm1]
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 12:53:53 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200512071253.54055.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051205235501.GC1770@elf.ucw.cz>

Hi,

On Tuesday, 6 December 2005 00:55, Pavel Machek wrote:
}-- snip --{
> > OTOH, we can get similar result by just making the kernel free some
> > more memory _after_ we are sure we have enough memory to suspend.
> > IOW, after the code that's currently in swsusp_shrink_memory() has finished,
> > we can try to free some "extra" memory to improve performance, if
> > needed.  The question is how much "extra" memory should be freed and
> > I'm afraid it will have to be tuned on the per-system, or at least
> > per-RAM-size, basis.
> 
> I'd prefer not to have extra tunables. "Write only 500MB" will work
> okay for common desktop users -- as long as common desktop fits into
> 500MB, that is. "Free not used in last 10 minutes" should work okay
> for everyone, but may be slightly harder to implement.

Still, it can be done with a fairly small patch that has an additional
advantage, as it allows us to get rid of the FAST_FREE constant
which I don't like.  Appended (untested).

Greetings,
Rafael


 kernel/power/power.h  |    8 +++-----
 kernel/power/swsusp.c |   16 ++++++++--------
 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6.15-rc5-mm1/kernel/power/power.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.15-rc5-mm1.orig/kernel/power/power.h	2005-12-05 22:07:12.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.15-rc5-mm1/kernel/power/power.h	2005-12-07 12:45:04.000000000 +0100
@@ -53,12 +53,10 @@
 extern struct pbe *pagedir_nosave;
 
 /*
- * This compilation switch determines the way in which memory will be freed
- * during suspend.  If defined, only as much memory will be freed as needed
- * to complete the suspend, which will make it go faster.  Otherwise, the
- * largest possible amount of memory will be freed.
+ * Preferred image size in MB (set it to zero to get the smallest
+ * image possible)
  */
-#define FAST_FREE	1
+#define IMAGE_SIZE	500
 
 extern asmlinkage int swsusp_arch_suspend(void);
 extern asmlinkage int swsusp_arch_resume(void);
Index: linux-2.6.15-rc5-mm1/kernel/power/swsusp.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.15-rc5-mm1.orig/kernel/power/swsusp.c	2005-12-05 22:07:12.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.15-rc5-mm1/kernel/power/swsusp.c	2005-12-07 12:40:27.000000000 +0100
@@ -626,6 +626,7 @@
 
 int swsusp_shrink_memory(void)
 {
+	unsigned long size;
 	long tmp;
 	struct zone *zone;
 	unsigned long pages = 0;
@@ -634,11 +635,11 @@
 
 	printk("Shrinking memory...  ");
 	do {
-#ifdef FAST_FREE
-		tmp = 2 * count_highmem_pages();
-		tmp += tmp / 50 + count_data_pages();
-		tmp += (tmp + PBES_PER_PAGE - 1) / PBES_PER_PAGE +
+		size = 2 * count_highmem_pages();
+		size += size / 50 + count_data_pages();
+		size += (size + PBES_PER_PAGE - 1) / PBES_PER_PAGE +
 			PAGES_FOR_IO;
+		tmp = size;
 		for_each_zone (zone)
 			if (!is_highmem(zone))
 				tmp -= zone->free_pages;
@@ -647,11 +648,10 @@
 			if (!tmp)
 				return -ENOMEM;
 			pages += tmp;
+		} else if (size > (IMAGE_SIZE * 1024 * 1024) / PAGE_SIZE) {
+			tmp = shrink_all_memory(SHRINK_BITE);
+			pages += tmp;
 		}
-#else
-		tmp = shrink_all_memory(SHRINK_BITE);
-		pages += tmp;
-#endif
 		printk("\b%c", p[i++%4]);
 	} while (tmp > 0);
 	printk("\bdone (%lu pages freed)\n", pages);


-- 
Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy - Benjamin Franklin

  reply	other threads:[~2005-12-07 11:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-12-05  8:19 swsusp performance problems in 2.6.15-rc3-mm1 Andy Isaacson
2005-12-05 12:17 ` Pavel Machek
2005-12-05 13:58   ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-12-05 17:29     ` Pavel Machek
2005-12-05 21:11       ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-12-05 23:34         ` Pavel Machek
2005-12-06  1:26           ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-12-06  1:52             ` Pavel Machek
2005-12-05 22:44       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-12-06  0:01         ` Pavel Machek
2005-12-05 22:28     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-12-06  1:07       ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-12-06  1:37         ` Pavel Machek
2005-12-06  1:47           ` Andy Isaacson
2005-12-06  1:56             ` IDE performance on notebooks [was Re: swsusp performance problems in 2.6.15-rc3-mm1] Pavel Machek
2005-12-06  6:23               ` Andy Isaacson
2005-12-06 11:56                 ` Pavel Machek
2005-12-06  1:57             ` swsusp performance problems in 2.6.15-rc3-mm1 Nigel Cunningham
2005-12-06  3:50             ` Mark Lord
2005-12-06 15:03               ` Mark Lord
2005-12-06  2:02           ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-12-06 12:09             ` Pavel Machek
2005-12-06  1:36       ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-12-06  2:06         ` Andy Isaacson
2005-12-06  2:21           ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-12-06 14:22             ` Pavel Machek
2005-12-07 22:05               ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-12-07 22:23                 ` Pavel Machek
2005-12-06  2:21           ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-12-06 12:18           ` Pavel Machek
2005-12-06 18:15             ` Andy Isaacson
2005-12-07  1:05               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-12-07  1:10                 ` Pavel Machek
2005-12-07 11:17                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-12-07 11:30                     ` Pavel Machek
2005-12-08 22:42                       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-12-08 22:50                         ` Pavel Machek
2005-12-05 21:18   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-12-05 23:55     ` swsusp: how much memory to free? [was Re: swsusp performance problems in 2.6.15-rc3-mm1] Pavel Machek
2005-12-07 11:53       ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2005-12-07 11:59         ` Pavel Machek
2005-12-07 12:16           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-12-07 12:18             ` Pavel Machek
2005-12-05 23:05 ` swsusp performance problems in 2.6.15-rc3-mm1 Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-12-06  0:12   ` Andy Isaacson
2005-12-06  0:51     ` Pavel Machek
2005-12-10 22:21   ` Andrew Morton
2005-12-10 23:07     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-12-10 23:33       ` Andrew Morton
2005-12-11 12:16         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-12-11 23:28           ` Pavel Machek
2005-12-12 17:45             ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200512071253.54055.rjw@sisk.pl \
    --to=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=adi@hexapodia.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome