From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Cc: Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Subject: Re: A proposal; making 2.6.20 a bugfix only version.
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 11:12:12 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061109111212.eee33367.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1163065920.3138.486.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
On Thu, 09 Nov 2006 10:52:00 +0100
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> wrote:
> Do you have the
> impression that high quality bug reports on lkml (with this I mean ones
> where there is sufficient information, which are not a request for
> support and where the reporter actually answers questions that are asked
> him) are not getting reasonable attention?
Yes.
And why does the report quality matter? If there's insufficient info you
just ask for more.
But we all know that and nothing's going to happen so there's really not
much point in discussing it. I have 270 saved-up-lkml-bug-reports to
process.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-11-09 19:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-11-08 22:09 Jesper Juhl
2006-11-08 22:22 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-11-08 22:40 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-11-08 23:05 ` Andreas Mohr
2006-11-08 23:54 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-11-10 15:15 ` Pavel Machek
2006-11-10 15:48 ` Horst H. von Brand
2006-11-15 21:04 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-11-08 22:51 ` Andrew Morton
2006-11-09 9:26 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-11-09 9:36 ` Andrew Morton
2006-11-09 9:52 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-11-09 19:12 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2006-11-09 19:21 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-11-09 21:11 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-11-09 21:31 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-11-09 23:56 ` Thomas Gleixner
2006-11-10 0:18 ` Andrew Morton
2006-11-10 17:45 ` Stefan Richter
2006-11-11 11:00 ` Martin J. Bligh
2006-11-08 23:28 ` Diego Calleja
2006-11-09 6:48 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-11-09 12:45 ` Rolf Eike Beer
2006-11-09 4:57 Al Boldi
2006-11-09 17:05 ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-11-10 15:52 ` Al Boldi
2006-11-10 16:16 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-11-10 16:42 ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-11-10 16:53 ` Randy Dunlap
2006-11-10 19:33 ` Al Boldi
2006-11-10 19:49 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-11-10 21:22 ` Al Boldi
2006-11-10 21:31 ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-11-11 4:15 ` Al Boldi
2006-11-11 5:09 ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-11-11 7:23 ` David Miller
2006-11-11 11:15 ` Al Boldi
2006-11-11 6:31 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2006-11-11 11:15 ` Al Boldi
2006-11-11 7:15 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-11-11 12:03 ` Neil Brown
2006-11-11 19:16 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2006-11-11 19:15 ` Adrian Bunk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061109111212.eee33367.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=jesper.juhl@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome