From: Al Boldi <a1426z@gawab.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: shemminger@osdl.org, arjan@infradead.org, rdunlap@xenotime.net,
jesper.juhl@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: A proposal; making 2.6.20 a bugfix only version.
Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 14:15:46 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200611111415.46691.a1426z@gawab.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061110.232342.35009769.davem@davemloft.net>
David Miller wrote:
> From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org>
> Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 21:09:17 -0800
>
> > On Sat, 11 Nov 2006 07:15:49 +0300
> >
> > Al Boldi <a1426z@gawab.com> wrote:
> > > Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > > > Al Boldi <a1426z@gawab.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > I meant structural OSI compliance.
> >
> > Read the book "Network Algorithmics"; it has a clear discussion
> > of why building your stack like the protocol specification
> > is a bad idea.
>
> Even Van Jacobson can be quoted as saying (to the effect) that
> layering is how you design protocols, _NOT_ how you implement
> them.
The problem is that you let the implementation surface into user-land.
Thanks!
--
Al
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-11-11 11:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-11-09 4:57 Al Boldi
2006-11-09 17:05 ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-11-10 15:52 ` Al Boldi
2006-11-10 16:16 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-11-10 16:42 ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-11-10 16:53 ` Randy Dunlap
2006-11-10 19:33 ` Al Boldi
2006-11-10 19:49 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-11-10 21:22 ` Al Boldi
2006-11-10 21:31 ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-11-11 4:15 ` Al Boldi
2006-11-11 5:09 ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-11-11 7:23 ` David Miller
2006-11-11 11:15 ` Al Boldi [this message]
2006-11-11 6:31 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2006-11-11 11:15 ` Al Boldi
2006-11-11 7:15 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-11-11 12:03 ` Neil Brown
2006-11-11 21:08 ` bugzilla (was Re: A proposal; making 2.6.20 a bugfix only version.) Pavel Machek
2006-11-11 19:16 ` A proposal; making 2.6.20 a bugfix only version Krzysztof Halasa
2006-11-11 19:15 ` Adrian Bunk
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-11-08 22:09 Jesper Juhl
2006-11-08 22:22 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-11-08 22:40 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-11-08 23:05 ` Andreas Mohr
2006-11-08 23:54 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-11-10 15:15 ` Pavel Machek
2006-11-10 15:48 ` Horst H. von Brand
2006-11-15 21:04 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-11-08 22:51 ` Andrew Morton
2006-11-09 9:26 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-11-09 9:36 ` Andrew Morton
2006-11-09 9:52 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-11-09 19:12 ` Andrew Morton
2006-11-09 19:21 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-11-09 21:11 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-11-09 21:31 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-11-09 23:56 ` Thomas Gleixner
2006-11-10 0:18 ` Andrew Morton
2006-11-10 17:45 ` Stefan Richter
2006-11-11 11:00 ` Martin J. Bligh
2006-11-08 23:28 ` Diego Calleja
2006-11-09 6:48 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-11-09 12:45 ` Rolf Eike Beer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200611111415.46691.a1426z@gawab.com \
--to=a1426z@gawab.com \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jesper.juhl@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
--cc=shemminger@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome