From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
Cc: rjw@sisk.pl, mingo@elte.hu, linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] sleepy linux self-test
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 22:03:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080210210349.GI15662@elf.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080203230826.C05AF9E4D0@adsl-69-226-248-13.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net>
Hi!
> > > > The changes look good to me.
> > >
> > > They feel unfinished to me though. :)
> > >
> > > Like using "jiffies" instead of a clocksource, which makes trouble
> > > since the timing covers periods with IRQs disabled. And the test
> > > mode parameter needs work.
> >
> > Well, I'd say that timing has bigger problem, right?
> >
> > It is
> >
> > set alarm
> > suspend system
> > | poweroff
> > alarm expires
> > system resumes
> >
> > ... so you are measuring resume time + sleep time, no?
>
> There's no "poweroff" step when entering STR or STANDBY!
>
> But more specifically, I avoided that issue by comparing times between
> (a) start and end of the "suspend devices" steps;
> (b) start and end of the "resume devices" steps.
>
> Example output, with the relevant lines highlighted by "*":
>
> PM: test RTC wakeup from 'mem' suspend
> PM: Syncing filesystems ... done.
> PM: Preparing system for mem sleep
> Freezing user space processes ... (elapsed 0.00 seconds) done.
> Freezing remaining freezable tasks ... (elapsed 0.00 seconds) done.
> PM: Entering mem sleep
> Suspending console(s)
> * PM: suspend devices took 0.000 seconds
> GPIO-A may wake for 00080000
> GPIO-C may wake for 00000008
> GPIO-D may wake for 00000020
> AT91: PM - wake mask 00000036, pm state 3
> AT91: PM - no slow clock mode yet ...
> AT91: PM - wakeup 00000002
> * PM: resume devices took 0.132 seconds
> PM: Finishing wakeup.
> Restarting tasks ... done.
>
> The underlying clocksource has resolution of 32 KiHz, while HZ=128;
> the "suspend" more typically reports 7 msec. And there should be a
> few more wakeup GPIOs, except I seem to not have enabled gpio_keys.
> That "wakeup 00000002" means the heavily-overloaded "system" IRQ
> woke the system ... the RTC is on that IRQ line.
Aha, that should work, yes. Sorry for noise.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-10 21:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-30 13:17 Pavel Machek
2008-01-30 16:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-30 16:39 ` Pavel Machek
2008-01-30 19:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-30 23:26 ` Pavel Machek
2008-02-01 14:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-02 12:45 ` Pavel Machek
2008-02-02 13:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-02 13:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-01 1:55 ` [linux-pm] " David Brownell
2008-02-02 12:47 ` Pavel Machek
2008-02-02 13:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-02 17:49 ` David Brownell
2008-02-02 18:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-02 19:47 ` David Brownell
2008-02-02 17:31 ` David Brownell
2008-02-02 17:51 ` David Brownell
2008-02-02 18:00 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-02 19:13 ` David Brownell
2008-02-02 19:32 ` Pavel Machek
2008-02-02 19:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-02 19:59 ` Pavel Machek
2008-02-03 2:37 ` David Brownell
2008-02-03 5:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-03 5:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-03 5:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-03 5:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-03 5:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-03 7:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-03 7:32 ` David Brownell
2008-02-03 12:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-02-03 13:16 ` David Brownell
2008-02-03 21:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-02-03 22:42 ` David Brownell
2008-02-03 22:43 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-02-03 22:48 ` Pavel Machek
2008-02-03 23:08 ` David Brownell
2008-02-10 21:03 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2008-02-18 8:56 ` Pavel Machek
2008-02-18 9:46 ` [patch] suspend/resume self-test Ingo Molnar
2008-02-18 9:53 ` Pavel Machek
2008-02-18 10:40 ` David Brownell
2008-02-18 11:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-02-18 13:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-18 20:16 ` David Brownell
2008-02-19 10:11 ` Pavel Machek
2008-02-19 14:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-19 19:12 ` David Brownell
2008-02-20 10:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-19 14:40 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-18 11:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-02-10 21:02 ` [linux-pm] sleepy linux self-test Pavel Machek
2008-02-03 7:18 ` David Brownell
2008-02-03 7:51 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-02-03 8:26 ` David Brownell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080210210349.GI15662@elf.ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®