mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: mingo@elte.hu
Cc: James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com
Subject: Re: [patch] x86, voyager: fix ioremap_nocache()
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 16:31:06 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080427.163106.181887129.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080427231809.GA13848@elte.hu>

From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 01:18:09 +0200

> But, we'd not mind at all posting 1000 x86.git patches to lkml (or 
> another list) every 3 months (or more frequently), if people request 
> that.

Keep defending yourself Ingo.

You can post whatever patches you like a million times to lkml.
That's not the problem.

It's that the patches don't get reviewed, posting them more or to a
different place doesn't help that.

And you add patches before they are properly reviewed.

Look at all of the postings people have made this merge window about
x86 merge fallout(s).  This is exactly the chief gripe of everyone,
that you merge patches with little or no review into your tree.

People paying attention can see what your goal is.  You've expressed
in the past that you think we're not merging patches in fast enough,
which is quite a laugh, and now that you can do x86 maintainence
you're going to ramp things up and show everyone "how it's done."

And at what a great expense this experiment is being performed.  Just
ask anyone who has tried to get any work done this past week or so.

  reply	other threads:[~2008-04-27 23:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-04-27 20:51 Breakage caused by unreviewed patch in x86 tree James Bottomley
2008-04-27 20:53 ` David Miller
2008-04-27 21:48 ` [patch] x86, voyager: fix ioremap_nocache() Ingo Molnar
2008-04-27 22:05   ` James Bottomley
2008-04-27 22:36     ` Willy Tarreau
2008-04-27 22:41     ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-27 23:18     ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-27 23:31       ` David Miller [this message]
2008-04-28  0:31         ` Rik van Riel
2008-04-28  0:45           ` Al Viro
2008-04-28  0:52             ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-04-28  9:01         ` Alan Cox
2008-04-28  9:17           ` David Miller
2008-04-28  9:48             ` Adrian Bunk
2008-04-28 11:50             ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-28  6:10       ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-04-28 16:55         ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-04-27 22:34   ` James Bottomley
2008-04-27 22:39     ` Jeff Garzik
2008-04-27 22:44       ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-04-27 22:46       ` David Miller
2008-04-27 22:52         ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-04-27 22:58           ` David Miller
2008-04-27 23:04             ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-04-30 20:35               ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-04-27 23:34           ` Jeff Garzik
2008-04-27 23:39             ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-04-27 22:53         ` Jeff Garzik
2008-04-27 22:56           ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-04-27 22:59             ` David Miller
2008-04-27 23:02             ` Jeff Garzik
2008-04-27 23:14               ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-04-27 23:01         ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-04-30 21:44           ` James Bottomley
2008-04-30 22:39             ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-04-27 23:01       ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-04-28 14:10       ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-04-28 14:29         ` James Bottomley
2008-04-28 15:07           ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-04-28 19:59             ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-04-27 22:00 ` Breakage caused by unreviewed patch in x86 tree H. Peter Anvin
2008-04-27 22:10   ` James Bottomley
2008-04-27 22:13     ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-04-27 22:18       ` James Bottomley
2008-04-27 22:31         ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-04-27 22:58 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-04-27 23:00   ` David Miller
2008-04-27 23:07     ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-04-27 23:03   ` James Bottomley
2008-04-27 23:11     ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-04-27 23:17     ` H. Peter Anvin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080427.163106.181887129.davem@davemloft.net \
    --to=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome