From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
mingo@elte.hu, James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com
Subject: Re: [patch] x86, voyager: fix ioremap_nocache()
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 01:45:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080428004507.GY5882@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080427203127.3c7d0e58@bree.surriel.com>
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 08:31:27PM -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 16:31:06 -0700 (PDT)
> David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
>
> > You can post whatever patches you like a million times to lkml.
> > That's not the problem.
> >
> > It's that the patches don't get reviewed, posting them more or to a
> > different place doesn't help that.
>
> If you really want to enforce this, I bet it could be automated
> with scripts around git.
>
> Simply refuse to apply a patch that does not have at least two
> Signed-off-by/Reviewed-by/Acked-by lines and refuse to apply
> a "git pull" if there is a changeset like that in the tree.
Yeah, right.
commit 138fe4e069798d9aa948a5402ff15e58f483ee4e
Author: Konrad Rzeszutek <ketuzsezr@darnok.org>
Date: Wed Apr 9 19:50:41 2008 -0700
Firmware: add iSCSI iBFT Support
...
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix build]
Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek <konradr@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>
Cc: Peter Jones <pjones@redhat.com>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
...
+static ssize_t sprintf_ipaddr(char *buf, u8 *ip)
+{
...
+ str += sprintf(str, NIP6_FMT, ntohs(ip[0]), ntohs(ip[1]),
+ ntohs(ip[2]), ntohs(ip[3]), ntohs(ip[4]),
+ ntohs(ip[5]), ntohs(ip[6]), ntohs(ip[7]));
are you going to tell me that this had been reviewed? Note these
ntohs() applied to 8bit values in there. Two signed-off-by, including
Greg "two s-o-b are enough to guarantee review"...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-28 0:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-27 20:51 Breakage caused by unreviewed patch in x86 tree James Bottomley
2008-04-27 20:53 ` David Miller
2008-04-27 21:48 ` [patch] x86, voyager: fix ioremap_nocache() Ingo Molnar
2008-04-27 22:05 ` James Bottomley
2008-04-27 22:36 ` Willy Tarreau
2008-04-27 22:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-27 23:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-27 23:31 ` David Miller
2008-04-28 0:31 ` Rik van Riel
2008-04-28 0:45 ` Al Viro [this message]
2008-04-28 0:52 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-04-28 9:01 ` Alan Cox
2008-04-28 9:17 ` David Miller
2008-04-28 9:48 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-04-28 11:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-28 6:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-04-28 16:55 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-04-27 22:34 ` James Bottomley
2008-04-27 22:39 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-04-27 22:44 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-04-27 22:46 ` David Miller
2008-04-27 22:52 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-04-27 22:58 ` David Miller
2008-04-27 23:04 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-04-30 20:35 ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-04-27 23:34 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-04-27 23:39 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-04-27 22:53 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-04-27 22:56 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-04-27 22:59 ` David Miller
2008-04-27 23:02 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-04-27 23:14 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-04-27 23:01 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-04-30 21:44 ` James Bottomley
2008-04-30 22:39 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-04-27 23:01 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-04-28 14:10 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-04-28 14:29 ` James Bottomley
2008-04-28 15:07 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-04-28 19:59 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-04-27 22:00 ` Breakage caused by unreviewed patch in x86 tree H. Peter Anvin
2008-04-27 22:10 ` James Bottomley
2008-04-27 22:13 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-04-27 22:18 ` James Bottomley
2008-04-27 22:31 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-04-27 22:58 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-04-27 23:00 ` David Miller
2008-04-27 23:07 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-04-27 23:03 ` James Bottomley
2008-04-27 23:11 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-04-27 23:17 ` H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080428004507.GY5882@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome