mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Merge setup_32/64.c into setup.c
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:36:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080625153614.GB18796@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200806250114.09858.yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>


* Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com> wrote:

> 
> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
> 
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/Makefile   |    2 
>  arch/x86/kernel/setup.c    |  676 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  arch/x86/kernel/setup_32.c |  543 ------------------------------------
>  arch/x86/kernel/setup_64.c |  381 -------------------------
>  include/asm-x86/setup.h    |    2 
>  5 files changed, 670 insertions(+), 934 deletions(-)

very nice!

could we please split this up into several, gradual steps that bring 
setup_32.c and setup_64.c to exactly the same content - where the final 
patch just renames arch/x86/kernel/setup_32.c to arch/x86/kernel/setup.c 
and deletes arch/x86/kernel/setup_64.c ?

it would still result in exactly the same end result - but is much more 
bisectable (and reviewable, etc.). A bit like how arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c 
or arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c was unified.

maybe it can be done in less than 10 patches - but it guess it should be 
rather something in the neighborhood of 20 patches. Changes like this:

-       /*
-        * NOTE: before this point _nobody_ is allowed to allocate
-        * any memory using the bootmem allocator.  Although the
-        * allocator is now initialised only the first 8Mb of the kernel
-        * virtual address space has been mapped.  All allocations before
-        * paging_init() has completed must use the alloc_bootmem_low_pages()
-        * variant (which allocates DMA'able memory) and care must be taken
-        * not to exceed the 8Mb limit.
-        */

should be in a separate patch - you removed this restriction from the 
x86 architecture via your earlier patches, so the removal of the comment 
comes from that (and deserves a separate commit), not purely from the 
mechanic unification in the end.

other changes like this:

-#ifdef CONFIG_X86_FIND_SMP_CONFIG
+#if defined(CONFIG_X86_FIND_SMP_CONFIG) && defined(CONFIG_X86_32) || \
+    defined(CONFIG_X86_MPPARSE) && defined(CONFIG_X86_64)

here you fix coding style:

-        /*
-         * Parse SRAT to discover nodes.
-         */
-        acpi_numa_init();
+       /*
+        * Parse SRAT to discover nodes.
+        */
+       acpi_numa_init();

etc. etc. You do a lot more very useful work than the plain single 
unification patch you sent tells us - all these changes should be split 
up.

[ and in the unlikely event of there being a bug somewhere in this 1600
  lines patch, a splitup is also useful for finding bugs :-) ]

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2008-06-25 15:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-06-25  5:13 [PATCH] x86: numa 32 using apicid_2_node to get node for logical_apicid Yinghai Lu
2008-06-25  5:14 ` [PATCH] x86: remove end_pfn in 64bit Yinghai Lu
2008-06-25  8:14   ` [PATCH] x86: Merge setup_32/64.c into setup.c Yinghai Lu
2008-06-25 15:36     ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2008-06-25 15:44       ` Yinghai Lu
2008-06-25 16:43         ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-25 17:28           ` Yinghai Lu
2008-06-25 17:38             ` Mike Travis
2008-06-25 17:46               ` Yinghai Lu
2008-06-25 17:48                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-06-25 15:41   ` [PATCH] x86: remove end_pfn in 64bit Ingo Molnar
2008-06-25 21:31     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-06-25 21:57       ` Yinghai Lu
2008-06-25 22:21         ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-06-25 23:14           ` Yinghai Lu
2008-06-25 23:16             ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-06-26 10:04       ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080625153614.GB18796@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=yhlu.kernel@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®