Re: [PATCH] x86: remove end_pfn in 64bit

[Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>]

* Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org> wrote:

> Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> * Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>   
>>> and use max_pfn directly.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
>>>     
>>
>> applied to tip/x86/setup-memory - thanks Yinghai. I have picked up 
>> these patches:
>>
>> Ingo Molnar (1):
>>       Merge branch 'x86/setup-memory'
>>
>> Yinghai Lu (6):
>>       x86: fix e820_update_range size when overlapping
>>       x86: get max_pfn_mapped in init_memory_mapping
>>       x86: add table_top check for alloc_low_page in 64 bit
>>       x86: change size if e820_update/remove_range
>>       x86: numa 32 using apicid_2_node to get node for logical_apicid
>>       x86: remove end_pfn in 64bit
>>   
>
> Did you CC: this to me to indicate that "x86_64: replace end_pfn with 
> num_physpages" conflicts massively with this patch?  Fortunately I 
> don't depend on it, so I don't mind much.

yeah, wanted to notify you, in case you were wondering about interaction 
in this area :)

	Ingo