From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Paul Menage <menage@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>,
"Randy.Dunlap" <rdunlap@xenotime.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Introduce down_try() so we can move away from down_trylock()
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 09:45:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080804094507.61b68eba@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200808041757.05323.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
> down_trylock -> down_try in drivers/watchdog/ar7_wdt.c
> down_trylock -> down_try in drivers/watchdog/it8712f_wdt.c
> down_trylock -> down_try in drivers/watchdog/s3c2410_wdt.c
> down_trylock -> down_try in drivers/watchdog/sc1200wdt.c
> down_trylock -> down_try in drivers/watchdog/scx200_wdt.c
> down_trylock -> down_try in drivers/watchdog/wdt_pci.c
I sent fixes for all of those to the watchdog maintainer in May. The
patches are still sitting with the maintainer. They all convert to proper
locking rather than sem abuse, clean up all the coding style and fix
numerous bugs plus remove BKL requirements.
Wim it appears is still trying to get real life stuff sorted out so I
think at this point we really need a new watchdog maintainer.
(See series of 57 patches "watchdog: Giant scrub" about 19th May)
Alan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-04 9:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-29 0:15 Rusty Russell
2008-07-29 0:27 ` Paul Menage
2008-07-29 13:01 ` Rusty Russell
2008-07-29 16:21 ` Randy Dunlap
2008-07-29 23:56 ` Rusty Russell
2008-08-01 17:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-01 17:40 ` Andrew Morton
2008-08-01 18:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-03 8:33 ` Rusty Russell
2008-08-03 13:07 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-08-03 17:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-03 17:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-04 3:28 ` Rusty Russell
2008-08-04 5:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-04 7:57 ` Rusty Russell
2008-08-04 8:45 ` Alan Cox [this message]
2008-08-04 11:43 ` Rusty Russell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080804094507.61b68eba@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--to=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=menage@google.com \
--cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®