From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, ltt-dev@lists.casi.polymtl.ca,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
Subject: [PATCH] Poll : introduce poll_wait_exclusive() new function
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 19:50:31 +0900 (JST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081125194700.26EB.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081124121659.GA18987@Krystal>
patch againt: tip/tracing/marker
==========
Currently, wake_up() function behavior depend on the way of
wait queue adding function.
wake_up() wake_up_all()
---------------------------------------------------------------
add_wait_queue() wake up all wake up all
add_wait_queue_exclusive() wake up one task wake up all
Unforunately, poll_wait() always use add_wait_queue().
it means there is no way that wake up only one process in polled processes.
wake_up() also wake up all sleeping processes, not 1 process.
Mathieu Desnoyers explained it cause following problem to LTTng.
In LTTng, all lttd readers are polling all the available debugfs files
for data. This is principally because the number of reader threads is
user-defined and there are typical workloads where a single CPU is
producing most of the tracing data and all other CPUs are idle,
available to consume data. It therefore makes sense not to tie those
threads to specific buffers. However, when the number of threads grows,
we face a "thundering herd" problem where many threads can be woken up
and put back to sleep, leaving only a single thread doing useful work.
this patch introduce poll_wait_exclusive() new API for allow wake up
only one process.
<usage example>
unsigned int foo_device_poll(struct file *file,
struct poll_table_struct *wait)
{
poll_wait_exclusive(file, &foo_wait_queue, wait);
if (data_exist)
return POLLIN | POLLRDNORM;
return 0;
}
</usage example>
Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
CC: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
---
fs/eventpoll.c | 7 +++++--
fs/select.c | 9 ++++++---
include/linux/poll.h | 13 +++++++++++--
3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
Index: b/fs/eventpoll.c
===================================================================
--- a/fs/eventpoll.c 2008-11-25 19:05:28.000000000 +0900
+++ b/fs/eventpoll.c 2008-11-25 19:15:50.000000000 +0900
@@ -655,7 +655,7 @@ out_unlock:
* target file wakeup lists.
*/
static void ep_ptable_queue_proc(struct file *file, wait_queue_head_t *whead,
- poll_table *pt)
+ poll_table *pt, int exclusive)
{
struct epitem *epi = ep_item_from_epqueue(pt);
struct eppoll_entry *pwq;
@@ -664,7 +664,10 @@ static void ep_ptable_queue_proc(struct
init_waitqueue_func_entry(&pwq->wait, ep_poll_callback);
pwq->whead = whead;
pwq->base = epi;
- add_wait_queue(whead, &pwq->wait);
+ if (exclusive)
+ add_wait_queue_exclusive(whead, &pwq->wait);
+ else
+ add_wait_queue(whead, &pwq->wait);
list_add_tail(&pwq->llink, &epi->pwqlist);
epi->nwait++;
} else {
Index: b/fs/select.c
===================================================================
--- a/fs/select.c 2008-11-25 19:04:26.000000000 +0900
+++ b/fs/select.c 2008-11-25 19:15:50.000000000 +0900
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ struct poll_table_page {
* poll table.
*/
static void __pollwait(struct file *filp, wait_queue_head_t *wait_address,
- poll_table *p);
+ poll_table *p, int exclusive);
void poll_initwait(struct poll_wqueues *pwq)
{
@@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ static struct poll_table_entry *poll_get
/* Add a new entry */
static void __pollwait(struct file *filp, wait_queue_head_t *wait_address,
- poll_table *p)
+ poll_table *p, int exclusive)
{
struct poll_table_entry *entry = poll_get_entry(p);
if (!entry)
@@ -182,7 +182,10 @@ static void __pollwait(struct file *filp
entry->filp = filp;
entry->wait_address = wait_address;
init_waitqueue_entry(&entry->wait, current);
- add_wait_queue(wait_address, &entry->wait);
+ if (exclusive)
+ add_wait_queue_exclusive(wait_address, &entry->wait);
+ else
+ add_wait_queue(wait_address, &entry->wait);
}
/**
Index: b/include/linux/poll.h
===================================================================
--- a/include/linux/poll.h 2008-11-25 19:04:26.000000000 +0900
+++ b/include/linux/poll.h 2008-11-25 19:19:54.000000000 +0900
@@ -28,7 +28,8 @@ struct poll_table_struct;
/*
* structures and helpers for f_op->poll implementations
*/
-typedef void (*poll_queue_proc)(struct file *, wait_queue_head_t *, struct poll_table_struct *);
+typedef void (*poll_queue_proc)(struct file *, wait_queue_head_t *,
+ struct poll_table_struct *, int);
typedef struct poll_table_struct {
poll_queue_proc qproc;
@@ -37,7 +38,15 @@ typedef struct poll_table_struct {
static inline void poll_wait(struct file * filp, wait_queue_head_t * wait_address, poll_table *p)
{
if (p && wait_address)
- p->qproc(filp, wait_address, p);
+ p->qproc(filp, wait_address, p, 0);
+}
+
+static inline void poll_wait_exclusive(struct file *filp,
+ wait_queue_head_t *wait_address,
+ poll_table *p)
+{
+ if (p && wait_address)
+ p->qproc(filp, wait_address, p, 1);
}
static inline void init_poll_funcptr(poll_table *pt, poll_queue_proc qproc)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-25 10:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-24 11:24 [RFC PATCH] Poll : add poll_wait_set_exclusive (fixing thundering herd problem in LTTng) Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-11-24 11:44 ` [ltt-dev] " KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-11-24 11:51 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-11-24 12:11 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-11-24 12:16 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-11-25 10:50 ` KOSAKI Motohiro [this message]
2008-11-25 21:19 ` [PATCH] Poll : introduce poll_wait_exclusive() new function Davide Libenzi
2008-11-26 1:09 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-11-26 11:15 ` [ltt-dev] " Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-11-26 11:20 ` Andrew McDermott
2008-11-26 22:27 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-11-27 0:08 ` Davide Libenzi
2008-11-27 12:50 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-11-28 13:13 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-12-02 1:27 ` Davide Libenzi
2008-12-02 4:44 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081125194700.26EB.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ltt-dev@lists.casi.polymtl.ca \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®