From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
ltt-dev@lists.casi.polymtl.ca,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>,
Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Poll : introduce poll_wait_exclusive() new function
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 10:09:29 +0900 (JST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081126100749.3CAC.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0811251316590.32523@alien.or.mcafeemobile.com>
> > Mathieu Desnoyers explained it cause following problem to LTTng.
> >
> > In LTTng, all lttd readers are polling all the available debugfs files
> > for data. This is principally because the number of reader threads is
> > user-defined and there are typical workloads where a single CPU is
> > producing most of the tracing data and all other CPUs are idle,
> > available to consume data. It therefore makes sense not to tie those
> > threads to specific buffers. However, when the number of threads grows,
> > we face a "thundering herd" problem where many threads can be woken up
> > and put back to sleep, leaving only a single thread doing useful work.
>
> Why do you need to have so many threads banging a single device/file?
> Have one (or any other very little number) puller thread(s), that
> activates with chucks of pulled data the other processing threads. That
> way there's no need for a new wakeup abstraction.
Mathieu, I don't hope I unstrictly explain to LTTng.
Could you please explain LTTng design?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-26 1:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-24 11:24 [RFC PATCH] Poll : add poll_wait_set_exclusive (fixing thundering herd problem in LTTng) Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-11-24 11:44 ` [ltt-dev] " KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-11-24 11:51 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-11-24 12:11 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-11-24 12:16 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-11-25 10:50 ` [PATCH] Poll : introduce poll_wait_exclusive() new function KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-11-25 21:19 ` Davide Libenzi
2008-11-26 1:09 ` KOSAKI Motohiro [this message]
2008-11-26 11:15 ` [ltt-dev] " Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-11-26 11:20 ` Andrew McDermott
2008-11-26 22:27 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-11-27 0:08 ` Davide Libenzi
2008-11-27 12:50 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-11-28 13:13 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-12-02 1:27 ` Davide Libenzi
2008-12-02 4:44 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081126100749.3CAC.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=davidel@xmailserver.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ltt-dev@lists.casi.polymtl.ca \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®