mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com,
	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>,
	Kyle McMartin <kyle@infradead.org>,
	Christoph Bartelmus <lirc@bartelmus.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] export get_task_comm()
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 19:15:52 +0900 (JST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090127191413.D488.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090127010035.18521a3b.akpm@linux-foundation.org>

> > > It's worth a checkpatch rule, I guess: "direct access to
> > > task_struct.comm is racy - use get_task_comm()".
> > 
> > And majority of usages is some debugging printk where nobody cares if ->comm
> > corrupted.
> > 
> > Changelog says is useful for debugging. That's right, tsk->comm is useful
> > for debugging, not allocating temporary buffer + get_task_comm().
> > 
> > Some ->comm usages are for kernel threads which never change it, for starters.
> > 
> > current->comm is always safe, because, current is not executing prctl(2)! 
> 
> That's a good point.
> 
> > I'd say nothing should be done and, heavens forbid, adding this to checkpatch.pl.
> 
> hm, yeah, OK, I'll drop it.

Oh, I have to agree Alexey because he is always right ;)





  reply	other threads:[~2009-01-27 10:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-01-16 19:32 get_task_comm() not exported? Christoph Bartelmus
2009-01-18 22:36 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-01-20 21:24   ` Christoph Bartelmus
2009-01-27  5:09     ` [PATCH] export get_task_comm() KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-01-27  5:16       ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-27  5:19         ` Kyle McMartin
2009-01-27  5:26           ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-27  5:29             ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-27  5:39               ` [PATCH] make checkpatch warn about access to current->comm Kyle McMartin
2009-01-27  5:50                 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-01-27  5:52                   ` Kyle McMartin
2009-01-27  5:58                     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-01-27  6:09                       ` Kyle McMartin
2009-01-27 15:45                 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-27 15:57                   ` Kyle McMartin
2009-01-27 18:15                   ` Christoph Bartelmus
2009-01-27  8:49               ` [PATCH] export get_task_comm() Alexey Dobriyan
2009-01-27  9:00                 ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-27 10:15                   ` KOSAKI Motohiro [this message]
2009-01-27 15:41         ` Linus Torvalds

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090127191413.D488.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --to=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=apw@shadowen.org \
    --cc=kyle@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lirc@bartelmus.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®