From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: add show_lapic=
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 14:28:05 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090927102805.GC4984@lenovo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090927085406.GB4984@lenovo>
[Cyrill Gorcunov - Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 12:54:06PM +0400]
| [Yinghai Lu - Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 01:29:22AM -0700]
| | Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
| | > [Yinghai Lu - Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 12:01:52AM -0700]
| | > |
| | > | so could use that together with apci=debug to print less cpu apic.
| | > |
| | > | otherwise for system have more cpus will take a while
| | > |
| | > | also move apic_verbosity check to print_all_ICs
| | > |
| | > | Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
| | > |
| | > | ---
| | > | arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
| | > | 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
| | > ...
| | >
| | > Hi Yinghai, good idea!
| | >
| | > I've tuned your patch a bit together with changelog.
| | >
| | > 1) show_lapic=1 by default does change current kernel behaviour
| | > so it should be set to max cpu available.
| |
| | think about system with lots of cpu. but i still want to use apic=debug
|
| but you should not change current behaviour. starting with this change
| I'll get only first apic dump, so if I don;t know how many apics I have
| what the number I should pass? Does it mean I would need to
| pass say show_lapic=2, or 4, or 6 or whatever _all-the-time_ to be sure
| my Core2Duo prints all lapics?
|
| |
| | > 2) show_lapic contains the max number of lapics being printed
| | > so we need to count them instead of plain comparation with
| | > cpu number, as a result I've changed print_local_APICs. Or
| | > you meant _exactly_ cpuid number? In meaning like
| | > show_lapic=max_cpuid. Hmm?
| | >
| | your change anything about that. there is not gap between cpu id.
|
| you walk with for_each_online_cpu with is not the same
| as for_each_present_cpu. yes, at this stage we hardly get
| the situation when cpu initialized and then suddenly get
| offline status but anyway
|
| |
| | YH
| |
| -- Cyrill
Also and your and my "update" (that named :-) missed the fact that get_option
may return without set argument at all, so num should be explicitly
initialized as well (in setup_show_lapic).
-- Cyrill
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-27 10:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-27 7:01 Yinghai Lu
2009-09-27 8:06 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-09-27 8:29 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-09-27 8:54 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-09-27 10:28 ` Cyrill Gorcunov [this message]
2009-09-27 14:40 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-09-27 17:42 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-09-28 16:07 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-09-28 17:46 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-09-28 18:02 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-09-30 15:26 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090927102805.GC4984@lenovo \
--to=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®