From: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
To: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com>
Cc: "lenb@kernel.org" <lenb@kernel.org>,
"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] ACPI: dock: add struct dock_station * directly to platform device data
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2009 15:52:30 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091010075230.GA7473@sli10-desk.sh.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091007220747.15597.90592.stgit@bob.kio>
On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 06:07:47AM +0800, Alex Chiang wrote:
> Instead of adding a (struct dock_station **) to our dock device's
> platform data, we can add the (struct dock_station *) directly.
>
> This change saves us some silly casting.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com>
> ---
>
> drivers/acpi/dock.c | 19 +++++++------------
> 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/dock.c b/drivers/acpi/dock.c
> index 1d693a1..e53d49b 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/dock.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/dock.c
> @@ -857,8 +857,7 @@ static ssize_t show_docked(struct device *dev,
> {
> struct acpi_device *tmp;
>
> - struct dock_station *dock_station = *((struct dock_station **)
> - dev->platform_data);
> + struct dock_station *dock_station = dev->platform_data;
>
> if (ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_bus_get_device(dock_station->handle, &tmp)))
> return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "1\n");
> @@ -872,8 +871,7 @@ static DEVICE_ATTR(docked, S_IRUGO, show_docked, NULL);
> static ssize_t show_flags(struct device *dev,
> struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> {
> - struct dock_station *dock_station = *((struct dock_station **)
> - dev->platform_data);
> + struct dock_station *dock_station = dev->platform_data;
> return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%d\n", dock_station->flags);
>
> }
> @@ -886,8 +884,7 @@ static ssize_t write_undock(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
> const char *buf, size_t count)
> {
> int ret;
> - struct dock_station *dock_station = *((struct dock_station **)
> - dev->platform_data);
> + struct dock_station *dock_station = dev->platform_data;
>
> if (!count)
> return -EINVAL;
> @@ -905,8 +902,7 @@ static ssize_t show_dock_uid(struct device *dev,
> struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> {
> unsigned long long lbuf;
> - struct dock_station *dock_station = *((struct dock_station **)
> - dev->platform_data);
> + struct dock_station *dock_station = dev->platform_data;
> acpi_status status = acpi_evaluate_integer(dock_station->handle,
> "_UID", NULL, &lbuf);
> if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
> @@ -919,8 +915,7 @@ static DEVICE_ATTR(uid, S_IRUGO, show_dock_uid, NULL);
> static ssize_t show_dock_type(struct device *dev,
> struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> {
> - struct dock_station *dock_station = *((struct dock_station **)
> - dev->platform_data);
> + struct dock_station *dock_station = dev->platform_data;
> char *type;
>
> if (dock_station->flags & DOCK_IS_DOCK)
> @@ -972,8 +967,8 @@ static int dock_add(acpi_handle handle)
> if (ret)
> goto err_free;
>
> - platform_device_add_data(dock_device, &ds,
> - sizeof(struct dock_station *));
> + platform_device_add_data(dock_device, ds,
> + sizeof(struct dock_station));
This patch isn't good. platform_device_add_data will malloc a new
'struct dock_station' and copy old to it, and later the two copy aren't
consistent. So NACK this one.
ACK other 5 patches.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-10 7:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-07 22:07 [PATCH 0/6] ACPI: dock: code hygiene Alex Chiang
2009-10-07 22:07 ` [PATCH 1/6] ACPI: dock: clean up error handling paths in dock_add() Alex Chiang
2009-10-07 22:07 ` [PATCH 2/6] ACPI: dock: rename local variable 'dock_station' " Alex Chiang
2009-10-07 22:07 ` [PATCH 3/6] ACPI: dock: clean up one more error path " Alex Chiang
2009-10-07 22:07 ` [PATCH 4/6] ACPI: dock: add struct dock_station * directly to platform device data Alex Chiang
2009-10-10 7:52 ` Shaohua Li [this message]
2009-10-12 17:17 ` Alex Chiang
2009-10-07 22:07 ` [PATCH 5/6] ACPI: dock: combine add|alloc_dock_dependent_device Alex Chiang
2009-10-07 22:07 ` [PATCH 6/6] ACPI: dock: minor whitespace and style cleanups Alex Chiang
2009-10-09 20:55 ` [PATCH 0/6] ACPI: dock: code hygiene Len Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091010075230.GA7473@sli10-desk.sh.intel.com \
--to=shaohua.li@intel.com \
--cc=achiang@hp.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®