mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: paulus@samba.org, eranian@google.com, robert.richter@amd.com,
	fweisbec@gmail.com, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 01/11] perf, x86: Remove superfluous arguments to x86_perf_event_set_period()
Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2010 17:39:37 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100303164305.914283692@chello.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100303163936.906011640@chello.nl>

[-- Attachment #1: perf-x86-cleanup-args.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2698 bytes --]

The second and third argument to x86_perf_event_set_period() are
superfluous since they are simple expressions of the first argument.
Hence remove them.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c       |   15 +++++++--------
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c |    2 +-
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
+++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
@@ -165,8 +165,7 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpu_hw_even
 	.enabled = 1,
 };
 
-static int x86_perf_event_set_period(struct perf_event *event,
-			     struct hw_perf_event *hwc, int idx);
+static int x86_perf_event_set_period(struct perf_event *event);
 
 /*
  * Generalized hw caching related hw_event table, filled
@@ -830,7 +829,7 @@ void hw_perf_enable(void)
 
 			if (hwc->idx == -1) {
 				x86_assign_hw_event(event, cpuc, i);
-				x86_perf_event_set_period(event, hwc, hwc->idx);
+				x86_perf_event_set_period(event);
 			}
 			/*
 			 * need to mark as active because x86_pmu_disable()
@@ -871,12 +870,12 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(u64 [X86_PMC_IDX_M
  * To be called with the event disabled in hw:
  */
 static int
-x86_perf_event_set_period(struct perf_event *event,
-			     struct hw_perf_event *hwc, int idx)
+x86_perf_event_set_period(struct perf_event *event)
 {
+	struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
 	s64 left = atomic64_read(&hwc->period_left);
 	s64 period = hwc->sample_period;
-	int err, ret = 0;
+	int err, ret = 0, idx = hwc->idx;
 
 	if (idx == X86_PMC_IDX_FIXED_BTS)
 		return 0;
@@ -974,7 +973,7 @@ static int x86_pmu_start(struct perf_eve
 	if (hwc->idx == -1)
 		return -EAGAIN;
 
-	x86_perf_event_set_period(event, hwc, hwc->idx);
+	x86_perf_event_set_period(event);
 	x86_pmu.enable(hwc, hwc->idx);
 
 	return 0;
@@ -1119,7 +1118,7 @@ static int x86_pmu_handle_irq(struct pt_
 		handled		= 1;
 		data.period	= event->hw.last_period;
 
-		if (!x86_perf_event_set_period(event, hwc, idx))
+		if (!x86_perf_event_set_period(event))
 			continue;
 
 		if (perf_event_overflow(event, 1, &data, regs))
Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
+++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
@@ -700,7 +700,7 @@ static int intel_pmu_save_and_restart(st
 	int ret;
 
 	x86_perf_event_update(event, hwc, idx);
-	ret = x86_perf_event_set_period(event, hwc, idx);
+	ret = x86_perf_event_set_period(event);
 
 	return ret;
 }

-- 


  reply	other threads:[~2010-03-03 16:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-03-03 16:39 [RFC][PATCH 00/11] Another stab at PEBS and LBR support Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-03 16:39 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2010-03-03 16:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 02/11] perf, x86: Remove superfluous arguments to x86_perf_event_update() Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-03 16:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 03/11] perf, x86: Change x86_pmu.{enable,disable} calling convention Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-03 16:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 04/11] perf, x86: Use unlocked bitops Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-03 16:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 05/11] perf: Generic perf_sample_data initialization Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-03 16:49   ` David Miller
2010-03-03 21:14   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-03-05  8:44   ` Jean Pihet
2010-03-03 16:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 06/11] perf, x86: PEBS infrastructure Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-03 17:38   ` Robert Richter
2010-03-03 17:42     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-04  8:50       ` Robert Richter
2010-03-03 16:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 07/11] perf: Provide PERF_SAMPLE_REGS Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-03 17:30   ` Stephane Eranian
2010-03-03 17:39     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-03 17:49       ` Stephane Eranian
2010-03-03 17:55         ` David Miller
2010-03-03 18:18           ` Stephane Eranian
2010-03-03 19:18           ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-04  2:59           ` Ingo Molnar
2010-03-04 12:58             ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2010-03-03 22:02   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-03-04  8:58     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-04 11:04       ` Ingo Molnar
2010-03-03 16:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 08/11] perf, x86: Implement simple LBR support Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-03 21:52   ` Stephane Eranian
2010-03-04  8:58     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-03 21:57   ` Stephane Eranian
2010-03-04  8:58     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-04 17:54       ` Stephane Eranian
2010-03-04 18:18         ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-04 20:23           ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-04 20:57             ` Stephane Eranian
2010-03-03 16:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 09/11] perf, x86: Implement PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_STACK Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-03 21:08   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-03-03 16:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 10/11] perf, x86: use LBR for PEBS IP+1 fixup Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-03 18:05   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2010-03-03 19:37     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-03 21:11       ` Masami Hiramatsu
2010-03-03 21:50         ` Stephane Eranian
2010-03-04  8:57           ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-09  1:41             ` Stephane Eranian
2010-03-03 16:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 11/11] perf, x86: Clean up IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES usage Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100303164305.914283692@chello.nl \
    --to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=robert.richter@amd.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome