From: Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, paulus@samba.org,
eranian@google.com, fweisbec@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 06/11] perf, x86: PEBS infrastructure
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 18:38:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100303173802.GL13205@erda.amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100303164306.299625712@chello.nl>
On 03.03.10 17:39:42, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Implement a simple PEBS model that always takes a single PEBS event at
> a time. This is done so that the interaction with the rest of the
> system is as expected (freq adjust, period randomization, lbr).
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
> ---
[...]
> +static int validate_event(struct perf_event *event)
> +{
> + struct cpu_hw_events *fake_cpuc;
> + struct event_constraint *c;
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + fake_cpuc = kmalloc(sizeof(*fake_cpuc), GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO);
> + if (!fake_cpuc)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + c = x86_pmu.get_event_constraints(fake_cpuc, event);
> +
> + if (!c || !c->weight)
> + ret = -ENOSPC;
> +
> + if (x86_pmu.put_event_constraints)
> + x86_pmu.put_event_constraints(fake_cpuc, event);
A fake cpu with the struct filled with zeros will cause a null pointer
exception in amd_get_event_constraints():
struct amd_nb *nb = cpuc->amd_nb;
Shouldn't x86_schedule_events() sufficient to decide if a single
counter is available? I did not yet look at group events, this might
happen there too.
-Robert
> +
> + kfree(fake_cpuc);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> * validate a single event group
> *
> * validation include:
> @@ -1495,6 +1426,8 @@ const struct pmu *hw_perf_event_init(str
>
> if (event->group_leader != event)
> err = validate_group(event);
> + else
> + err = validate_event(event);
>
> event->pmu = tmp;
> }
--
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Operating System Research Center
email: robert.richter@amd.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-03 17:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-03 16:39 [RFC][PATCH 00/11] Another stab at PEBS and LBR support Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-03 16:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 01/11] perf, x86: Remove superfluous arguments to x86_perf_event_set_period() Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-03 16:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 02/11] perf, x86: Remove superfluous arguments to x86_perf_event_update() Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-03 16:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 03/11] perf, x86: Change x86_pmu.{enable,disable} calling convention Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-03 16:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 04/11] perf, x86: Use unlocked bitops Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-03 16:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 05/11] perf: Generic perf_sample_data initialization Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-03 16:49 ` David Miller
2010-03-03 21:14 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-03-05 8:44 ` Jean Pihet
2010-03-03 16:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 06/11] perf, x86: PEBS infrastructure Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-03 17:38 ` Robert Richter [this message]
2010-03-03 17:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-04 8:50 ` Robert Richter
2010-03-03 16:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 07/11] perf: Provide PERF_SAMPLE_REGS Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-03 17:30 ` Stephane Eranian
2010-03-03 17:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-03 17:49 ` Stephane Eranian
2010-03-03 17:55 ` David Miller
2010-03-03 18:18 ` Stephane Eranian
2010-03-03 19:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-04 2:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-03-04 12:58 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2010-03-03 22:02 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-03-04 8:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-04 11:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-03-03 16:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 08/11] perf, x86: Implement simple LBR support Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-03 21:52 ` Stephane Eranian
2010-03-04 8:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-03 21:57 ` Stephane Eranian
2010-03-04 8:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-04 17:54 ` Stephane Eranian
2010-03-04 18:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-04 20:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-04 20:57 ` Stephane Eranian
2010-03-03 16:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 09/11] perf, x86: Implement PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_STACK Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-03 21:08 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-03-03 16:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 10/11] perf, x86: use LBR for PEBS IP+1 fixup Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-03 18:05 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2010-03-03 19:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-03 21:11 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2010-03-03 21:50 ` Stephane Eranian
2010-03-04 8:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-09 1:41 ` Stephane Eranian
2010-03-03 16:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 11/11] perf, x86: Clean up IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES usage Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100303173802.GL13205@erda.amd.com \
--to=robert.richter@amd.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome