From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: paulus@samba.org, eranian@google.com, robert.richter@amd.com,
fweisbec@gmail.com, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 09/11] perf, x86: Implement PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_STACK
Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2010 17:39:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100303164306.526626387@chello.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100303163936.906011640@chello.nl>
[-- Attachment #1: perf-sample-lbr.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 9664 bytes --]
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c | 14 +++-------
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c | 10 ++++++-
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c | 16 ++++--------
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_lbr.c | 20 ++++++++-------
include/linux/perf_event.h | 27 +++++++++++++++++---
kernel/perf_event.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------
6 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/perf_event.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/perf_event.h
+++ linux-2.6/include/linux/perf_event.h
@@ -126,8 +126,9 @@ enum perf_event_sample_format {
PERF_SAMPLE_STREAM_ID = 1U << 9,
PERF_SAMPLE_RAW = 1U << 10,
PERF_SAMPLE_REGS = 1U << 11,
+ PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_STACK = 1U << 12,
- PERF_SAMPLE_MAX = 1U << 12, /* non-ABI */
+ PERF_SAMPLE_MAX = 1U << 13, /* non-ABI */
};
/*
@@ -395,9 +396,14 @@ enum perf_event_type {
* { struct read_format values; } && PERF_SAMPLE_READ
* { struct pt_regs regs; } && PERF_SAMPLE_REGS
*
- * { u64 nr,
+ * { u64 nr;
* u64 ips[nr]; } && PERF_SAMPLE_CALLCHAIN
*
+ * { u64 nr;
+ * { u64 from, to, flags;
+ * } lbr[nr]; } && PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_STACK
+ *
+ *
* #
* # The RAW record below is opaque data wrt the ABI
* #
@@ -469,6 +475,17 @@ struct perf_raw_record {
void *data;
};
+struct perf_branch_entry {
+ __u64 from;
+ __u64 to;
+ __u64 flags;
+};
+
+struct perf_branch_stack {
+ __u64 nr;
+ struct perf_branch_entry entries[0];
+};
+
struct task_struct;
/**
@@ -803,13 +820,15 @@ struct perf_sample_data {
struct perf_callchain_entry *callchain;
struct perf_raw_record *raw;
struct pt_regs *regs;
+ struct perf_branch_stack *branches;
};
static inline
void perf_sample_data_init(struct perf_sample_data *data, u64 addr)
{
- data->addr = addr;
- data->raw = NULL;
+ data->addr = addr;
+ data->raw = NULL;
+ data->branches = NULL;
}
extern void perf_output_sample(struct perf_output_handle *handle,
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/perf_event.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/perf_event.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/perf_event.c
@@ -3189,12 +3189,9 @@ void perf_output_sample(struct perf_outp
if (sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_CALLCHAIN) {
if (data->callchain) {
- int size = 1;
+ int size = sizeof(u64);
- if (data->callchain)
- size += data->callchain->nr;
-
- size *= sizeof(u64);
+ size += data->callchain->nr * sizeof(u64);
perf_output_copy(handle, data->callchain, size);
} else {
@@ -3203,6 +3200,20 @@ void perf_output_sample(struct perf_outp
}
}
+ if (sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_STACK) {
+ if (data->branches) {
+ int size = sizeof(u64);
+
+ size += data->branches->nr *
+ sizeof(struct perf_branch_entry);
+
+ perf_output_copy(handle, data->branches, size);
+ } else {
+ u64 nr = 0;
+ perf_output_put(handle, nr);
+ }
+ }
+
if (sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_RAW) {
if (data->raw) {
perf_output_put(handle, data->raw->size);
@@ -3291,14 +3302,25 @@ void perf_prepare_sample(struct perf_eve
}
if (sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_CALLCHAIN) {
- int size = 1;
+ int size = sizeof(u64);
data->callchain = perf_callchain(regs);
if (data->callchain)
- size += data->callchain->nr;
+ size += data->callchain->nr * sizeof(u64);
+
+ header->size += size;
+ }
- header->size += size * sizeof(u64);
+ if (sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_STACK) {
+ int size = sizeof(u64);
+
+ if (data->branches) {
+ size += data->branches->nr *
+ sizeof(struct perf_branch_entry);
+ }
+
+ header->size += size;
}
if (sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_RAW) {
Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
+++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
@@ -50,10 +50,6 @@ struct amd_nb {
#define MAX_LBR_ENTRIES 16
-struct lbr_entry {
- u64 from, to, flags;
-};
-
struct cpu_hw_events {
/*
* Generic x86 PMC bits
@@ -78,10 +74,10 @@ struct cpu_hw_events {
/*
* Intel LBR bits
*/
- int lbr_users;
- int lbr_entries;
- struct lbr_entry lbr_stack[MAX_LBR_ENTRIES];
- void *lbr_context;
+ int lbr_users;
+ void *lbr_context;
+ struct perf_branch_stack lbr_stack;
+ struct perf_branch_entry lbr_entries[MAX_LBR_ENTRIES];
/*
* AMD specific bits
@@ -166,7 +162,7 @@ struct x86_pmu {
*/
int bts, pebs;
int pebs_record_size;
- void (*drain_pebs)(void);
+ void (*drain_pebs)(struct perf_sample_data *data);
struct event_constraint *pebs_constraints;
/*
Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_lbr.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_lbr.c
+++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_lbr.c
@@ -138,11 +138,11 @@ static void intel_pmu_lbr_read_32(struct
rdmsrl(x86_pmu.lbr_from + lbr_idx, msr_lastbranch.lbr);
- cpuc->lbr_stack[i].from = msr_lastbranch.from;
- cpuc->lbr_stack[i].to = msr_lastbranch.to;
- cpuc->lbr_stack[i].flags = 0;
+ cpuc->lbr_entries[i].from = msr_lastbranch.from;
+ cpuc->lbr_entries[i].to = msr_lastbranch.to;
+ cpuc->lbr_entries[i].flags = 0;
}
- cpuc->lbr_entries = i;
+ cpuc->lbr_stack.nr = i;
}
#define LBR_FROM_FLAG_MISPRED (1ULL << 63)
@@ -170,14 +170,14 @@ static void intel_pmu_lbr_read_64(struct
from = (u64)((((s64)from) << 1) >> 1);
}
- cpuc->lbr_stack[i].from = from;
- cpuc->lbr_stack[i].to = to;
- cpuc->lbr_stack[i].flags = flags;
+ cpuc->lbr_entries[i].from = from;
+ cpuc->lbr_entries[i].to = to;
+ cpuc->lbr_entries[i].flags = flags;
}
- cpuc->lbr_entries = i;
+ cpuc->lbr_stack.nr = i;
}
-static void intel_pmu_lbr_read(void)
+static void intel_pmu_lbr_read(struct perf_sample_data *data)
{
struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = &__get_cpu_var(cpu_hw_events);
@@ -188,6 +188,8 @@ static void intel_pmu_lbr_read(void)
intel_pmu_lbr_read_32(cpuc);
else
intel_pmu_lbr_read_64(cpuc);
+
+ data->branches = &cpuc->lbr_stack;
}
static int intel_pmu_lbr_format(void)
Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
+++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
@@ -548,6 +548,9 @@ static void intel_pmu_disable_event(stru
if (unlikely(event->attr.precise))
intel_pmu_pebs_disable(hwc);
+
+ if (event->attr.sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_STACK)
+ intel_pmu_lbr_disable(event);
}
static void intel_pmu_enable_fixed(struct hw_perf_event *hwc)
@@ -602,6 +605,9 @@ static void intel_pmu_enable_event(struc
if (unlikely(event->attr.precise))
intel_pmu_pebs_enable(hwc);
+ if (event->attr.sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_STACK)
+ intel_pmu_lbr_enable(event);
+
__x86_pmu_enable_event(hwc);
}
@@ -677,13 +683,13 @@ again:
inc_irq_stat(apic_perf_irqs);
ack = status;
- intel_pmu_lbr_read();
+ intel_pmu_lbr_read(&data);
/*
* PEBS overflow sets bit 62 in the global status register
*/
if (__test_and_clear_bit(62, (unsigned long *)&status))
- x86_pmu.drain_pebs();
+ x86_pmu.drain_pebs(&data);
for_each_bit(bit, (unsigned long *)&status, X86_PMC_IDX_MAX) {
struct perf_event *event = cpuc->events[bit];
Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c
+++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c
@@ -418,13 +418,12 @@ do { \
static int intel_pmu_save_and_restart(struct perf_event *event);
static void intel_pmu_disable_event(struct perf_event *event);
-static void intel_pmu_drain_pebs_core(void)
+static void intel_pmu_drain_pebs_core(struct perf_sample_data *data)
{
struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = &__get_cpu_var(cpu_hw_events);
struct debug_store *ds = cpuc->ds;
struct perf_event *event = cpuc->events[0]; /* PMC0 only */
struct pebs_record_core *at, *top;
- struct perf_sample_data data;
struct pt_regs regs;
int n;
@@ -444,8 +443,7 @@ static void intel_pmu_drain_pebs_core(vo
if (!intel_pmu_save_and_restart(event))
goto out;
- perf_sample_data_init(&data, 0);
- data.period = event->hw.last_period;
+ data->period = event->hw.last_period;
n = top - at;
@@ -460,19 +458,18 @@ static void intel_pmu_drain_pebs_core(vo
PEBS_TO_REGS(at, ®s);
- if (perf_event_overflow(event, 1, &data, ®s))
+ if (perf_event_overflow(event, 1, data, ®s))
intel_pmu_disable_event(event);
out:
intel_pmu_pebs_enable_all();
}
-static void intel_pmu_drain_pebs_nhm(void)
+static void intel_pmu_drain_pebs_nhm(struct perf_sample_data *data)
{
struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = &__get_cpu_var(cpu_hw_events);
struct debug_store *ds = cpuc->ds;
struct pebs_record_nhm *at, *top;
- struct perf_sample_data data;
struct perf_event *event = NULL;
struct pt_regs regs;
int bit, n;
@@ -519,12 +516,11 @@ static void intel_pmu_drain_pebs_nhm(voi
if (!intel_pmu_save_and_restart(event))
continue;
- perf_sample_data_init(&data, 0);
- data.period = event->hw.last_period;
+ data->period = event->hw.last_period;
PEBS_TO_REGS(at, ®s);
- if (perf_event_overflow(event, 1, &data, ®s))
+ if (perf_event_overflow(event, 1, data, ®s))
intel_pmu_disable_event(event);
}
out:
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-03 16:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-03 16:39 [RFC][PATCH 00/11] Another stab at PEBS and LBR support Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-03 16:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 01/11] perf, x86: Remove superfluous arguments to x86_perf_event_set_period() Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-03 16:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 02/11] perf, x86: Remove superfluous arguments to x86_perf_event_update() Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-03 16:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 03/11] perf, x86: Change x86_pmu.{enable,disable} calling convention Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-03 16:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 04/11] perf, x86: Use unlocked bitops Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-03 16:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 05/11] perf: Generic perf_sample_data initialization Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-03 16:49 ` David Miller
2010-03-03 21:14 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-03-05 8:44 ` Jean Pihet
2010-03-03 16:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 06/11] perf, x86: PEBS infrastructure Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-03 17:38 ` Robert Richter
2010-03-03 17:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-04 8:50 ` Robert Richter
2010-03-03 16:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 07/11] perf: Provide PERF_SAMPLE_REGS Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-03 17:30 ` Stephane Eranian
2010-03-03 17:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-03 17:49 ` Stephane Eranian
2010-03-03 17:55 ` David Miller
2010-03-03 18:18 ` Stephane Eranian
2010-03-03 19:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-04 2:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-03-04 12:58 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2010-03-03 22:02 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-03-04 8:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-04 11:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-03-03 16:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 08/11] perf, x86: Implement simple LBR support Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-03 21:52 ` Stephane Eranian
2010-03-04 8:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-03 21:57 ` Stephane Eranian
2010-03-04 8:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-04 17:54 ` Stephane Eranian
2010-03-04 18:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-04 20:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-04 20:57 ` Stephane Eranian
2010-03-03 16:39 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2010-03-03 21:08 ` [RFC][PATCH 09/11] perf, x86: Implement PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_STACK Frederic Weisbecker
2010-03-03 16:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 10/11] perf, x86: use LBR for PEBS IP+1 fixup Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-03 18:05 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2010-03-03 19:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-03 21:11 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2010-03-03 21:50 ` Stephane Eranian
2010-03-04 8:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-09 1:41 ` Stephane Eranian
2010-03-03 16:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 11/11] perf, x86: Clean up IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES usage Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100303164306.526626387@chello.nl \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=robert.richter@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome