mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: paulus@samba.org, eranian@google.com, robert.richter@amd.com,
	fweisbec@gmail.com, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 04/11] perf, x86: Use unlocked bitops
Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2010 17:39:40 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100303164306.146651942@chello.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100303163936.906011640@chello.nl>

[-- Attachment #1: perf-x86-unlocked-bitops.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2593 bytes --]

There is no concurrency on these variables, so don't use LOCK'ed ops.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c       |    8 ++++----
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd.c   |    2 +-
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c |    2 +-
 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
+++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
@@ -638,7 +638,7 @@ static int x86_schedule_events(struct cp
 		if (test_bit(hwc->idx, used_mask))
 			break;
 
-		set_bit(hwc->idx, used_mask);
+		__set_bit(hwc->idx, used_mask);
 		if (assign)
 			assign[i] = hwc->idx;
 	}
@@ -687,7 +687,7 @@ static int x86_schedule_events(struct cp
 			if (j == X86_PMC_IDX_MAX)
 				break;
 
-			set_bit(j, used_mask);
+			__set_bit(j, used_mask);
 
 			if (assign)
 				assign[i] = j;
@@ -837,7 +837,7 @@ void hw_perf_enable(void)
 			 * clear active_mask and events[] yet it preserves
 			 * idx
 			 */
-			set_bit(hwc->idx, cpuc->active_mask);
+			__set_bit(hwc->idx, cpuc->active_mask);
 			cpuc->events[hwc->idx] = event;
 
 			x86_pmu.enable(event);
@@ -1052,7 +1052,7 @@ static void x86_pmu_stop(struct perf_eve
 	 * Must be done before we disable, otherwise the nmi handler
 	 * could reenable again:
 	 */
-	clear_bit(idx, cpuc->active_mask);
+	__clear_bit(idx, cpuc->active_mask);
 	x86_pmu.disable(event);
 
 	/*
Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd.c
+++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd.c
@@ -309,7 +309,7 @@ static struct amd_nb *amd_alloc_nb(int c
 	 * initialize all possible NB constraints
 	 */
 	for (i = 0; i < x86_pmu.num_events; i++) {
-		set_bit(i, nb->event_constraints[i].idxmsk);
+		__set_bit(i, nb->event_constraints[i].idxmsk);
 		nb->event_constraints[i].weight = 1;
 	}
 	return nb;
Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
+++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
@@ -768,7 +768,7 @@ again:
 	for_each_bit(bit, (unsigned long *)&status, X86_PMC_IDX_MAX) {
 		struct perf_event *event = cpuc->events[bit];
 
-		clear_bit(bit, (unsigned long *) &status);
+		__clear_bit(bit, (unsigned long *) &status);
 		if (!test_bit(bit, cpuc->active_mask))
 			continue;
 

-- 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-03-03 16:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-03-03 16:39 [RFC][PATCH 00/11] Another stab at PEBS and LBR support Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-03 16:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 01/11] perf, x86: Remove superfluous arguments to x86_perf_event_set_period() Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-03 16:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 02/11] perf, x86: Remove superfluous arguments to x86_perf_event_update() Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-03 16:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 03/11] perf, x86: Change x86_pmu.{enable,disable} calling convention Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-03 16:39 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2010-03-03 16:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 05/11] perf: Generic perf_sample_data initialization Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-03 16:49   ` David Miller
2010-03-03 21:14   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-03-05  8:44   ` Jean Pihet
2010-03-03 16:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 06/11] perf, x86: PEBS infrastructure Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-03 17:38   ` Robert Richter
2010-03-03 17:42     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-04  8:50       ` Robert Richter
2010-03-03 16:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 07/11] perf: Provide PERF_SAMPLE_REGS Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-03 17:30   ` Stephane Eranian
2010-03-03 17:39     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-03 17:49       ` Stephane Eranian
2010-03-03 17:55         ` David Miller
2010-03-03 18:18           ` Stephane Eranian
2010-03-03 19:18           ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-04  2:59           ` Ingo Molnar
2010-03-04 12:58             ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2010-03-03 22:02   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-03-04  8:58     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-04 11:04       ` Ingo Molnar
2010-03-03 16:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 08/11] perf, x86: Implement simple LBR support Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-03 21:52   ` Stephane Eranian
2010-03-04  8:58     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-03 21:57   ` Stephane Eranian
2010-03-04  8:58     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-04 17:54       ` Stephane Eranian
2010-03-04 18:18         ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-04 20:23           ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-04 20:57             ` Stephane Eranian
2010-03-03 16:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 09/11] perf, x86: Implement PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_STACK Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-03 21:08   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-03-03 16:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 10/11] perf, x86: use LBR for PEBS IP+1 fixup Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-03 18:05   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2010-03-03 19:37     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-03 21:11       ` Masami Hiramatsu
2010-03-03 21:50         ` Stephane Eranian
2010-03-04  8:57           ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-09  1:41             ` Stephane Eranian
2010-03-03 16:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 11/11] perf, x86: Clean up IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES usage Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100303164306.146651942@chello.nl \
    --to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=robert.richter@amd.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome