mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de>
To: florian@mickler.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>,
	Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scripts/get_maintainer.pl: default to not include unspecified tags
Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 09:48:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100511074833.GC24844@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1273559797-6910-1-git-send-email-florian@mickler.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2265 bytes --]

On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 08:36:36AM +0200, florian@mickler.org wrote:
> This changes the default of the option --git-all-signature-types to be
> disabled by default.
> 
> The effect being, that only certain (currently  Signed-Off-By:,
> Acked-By: and Reviewed-By:) tags are used to get adresses of potential
> maintainers.
> 
> Motivated is this change by the desire to not 'spam' people unnecessary:
> A Tested-By or a Reported-By is not ment as a hint that those people
> want to/are able to review patches to the code in question.
> 
> In a quest to find resilient statistics for this i came up with this:
> 
> I produced a list of all the tag-signers not already covered
> with a signed-off/acked/reviewed tag somewhere in the last year of git history.
> 
> Those were 650 addresses of "assumed non-developers".
> 
> And to check if those "assumed non-developers" are professional
> testers/reporters worth cc'ing, i then counted their total appearences
> in the git log:
> 
> 469 were mentioned only once.
> 123 were mentioned twice.
> 38 three times
> 8 four times
> 5 six times
> 5 five times
> 1 eight times
> 1 fourteen times
> 
> I believe this supports my thesis, that the ''non-maintainer-tags'' are
> not actively useful for patch-review. (except probably the guy
> mentioned fourteen times...)
> 
> But of course one could also find arguments to poke holes in this
> statistics, for example does this statistic not include code-locality:
> A tested-by on a patch that touches some specific piece of
> code can be more worth than a signed-off in another part of the tree.
> 
> But... let's play it safe and let's err on the "safe" side
> meaning to not spam those people when in doubt. We already have the
> signed-off's and Maintainers file. So this should be ok. And if need be, 
> the maintainers can always forward the patch.
> 
> [i probably could make a diploma thesis out of this changelog :)]

:D

> 
> Signed-off-by: Florian Mickler <florian@mickler.org>

I second this reasoning:

Acked-by: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de>

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Wolfram Sang                |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2010-05-11  7:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-06  1:57 [PATCH] epoll: use wrapper functions Changli Gao
2010-05-06  6:00 ` indiscriminate get_maintainer.pl usage (was [PATCH] epoll: use wrapper functions) Stefan Richter
     [not found]   ` <s2t412e6f7f1005052319sdbf3fdfbg256d11b983c4f304@mail.gmail.com>
2010-05-06  6:40     ` indiscriminate get_maintainer.pl usage Stefan Richter
2010-05-06 15:42       ` Davide Libenzi
2010-05-06 16:52         ` Joe Perches
2010-05-06 17:59           ` Davide Libenzi
2010-05-06 20:52             ` Joe Perches
2010-05-07  6:34               ` [PATCH] get_maintainer.pl: ignore non-maintainer tags florian
2010-05-07  6:39                 ` Joe Perches
2010-05-07  7:02                   ` Florian Mickler
2010-05-07 19:48                     ` Stefan Richter
2010-05-08 21:32                       ` [PATCH] get_maintainer.pl: optionally " florian
2010-05-08 21:39                         ` [PATCH] [RFC] get_maintainer.pl: only list maintainers by default florian
2010-05-08 22:44                           ` Joe Perches
2010-05-08 23:23                             ` Stefan Richter
2010-05-08 23:51                               ` Joe Perches
2010-05-09  0:22                                 ` Stefan Richter
2010-05-09  0:57                                   ` Joe Perches
2010-05-09  8:18                                     ` Stefan Richter
2010-05-09  8:41                                       ` Stefan Richter
2010-05-09  8:49                                     ` Florian Mickler
2010-05-09  9:12                                     ` Stefan Richter
2010-05-09  8:40                             ` Florian Mickler
2010-05-08 22:06                         ` [PATCH] get_maintainer.pl: optionally ignore non-maintainer tags Joe Perches
2010-05-09  9:15                           ` [PATCH v2] " florian
2010-05-09  9:35                             ` Stefan Richter
2010-05-10  4:56                             ` [PATCH 0/2] scripts/get_maintainer.pl: trivial improvements Joe Perches
2010-05-10  4:56                               ` [PATCH 1/2] scripts/get_maintainer.pl: optionally ignore non-maintainer signatures Joe Perches
2010-05-10  5:07                                 ` Florian Mickler
2010-05-11  6:36                                 ` [PATCH] scripts/get_maintainer.pl: default to not include unspecified tags florian
2010-05-11  7:48                                   ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2010-05-11 15:59                                   ` Joe Perches
2010-05-11 16:33                                     ` Florian Mickler
2010-05-11 16:40                                       ` Joe Perches
2010-05-10  4:56                               ` [PATCH 2/2] scripts/get_maintainer.pl: add .get_maintainer.conf default options file Joe Perches
2010-05-12  6:30                                 ` Américo Wang
2010-05-12  9:25                                   ` Florian Mickler
2010-05-13 15:58                                     ` Américo Wang
2010-05-13 16:22                                       ` Joe Perches
2010-05-08 22:26                         ` [PATCH] " Joe Perches
2010-05-09  9:12                           ` Florian Mickler
2010-05-06 20:13       ` indiscriminate get_maintainer.pl usage Roland Dreier
2010-05-06 18:47 ` [PATCH] epoll: use wrapper functions Davide Libenzi
2010-05-06 18:51   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-07  2:48     ` Changli Gao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100511074833.GC24844@pengutronix.de \
    --to=w.sang@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=florian@mickler.org \
    --cc=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
    --cc=stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome